Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY SCOLIOSIS

Pages
147–152
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We believe encouraging improvements can be obtained with posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery in CP scoliosis patients minimizing complications including coronal balance, sagittal balance and pelvic obliquity and there is no major disadvantage compared to the unit rod instrumentation system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Static encephalopathy developing linked to damage occurring in the immature brain for any reason is called cerebral palsy (CP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, we retrospectively investigated CP scoliosis cases operated at our clinic and complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We believe encouraging improvements can be obtained with posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery in CP scoliosis patients minimizing complications including coronal balance, sagittal balance and pelvic obliquity and there is no major disadvantage compared to the unit rod instrumentation system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Static encephalopathy developing linked to damage occurring in the immature brain for any reason is called cerebral palsy (CP). As CP patients have abnormal muscle tonus and linked posture disorders, scoliosis is frequently encountered. In this article, we retrospectively investigated CP scoliosis cases operated at our clinic and complications. Material and Method: Thirteen patients with surgical treatment at our clinic from 2011-2017 for CP scoliosis were retrospectively investigated. The surgical techniques, improvement rates, perioperative complications and long-term motor function changes (GMFCS) were assessed. Results: Nine males and 4 females were operated. Mean age was 14.3 years (range: 5-21), and mean Cobb angle was 79.3 (range: 45-135). The improvement amount in the Cobb angle was assessed as 48.2 (range: 20-70). Preoperative GMFCS score was 5 for 7 patients, 4 for 5 patients and 3 for 1 patient. One patient developed paraplegia in the 12th hour after correction (this patient was exitus in the postop 6th month due to later developing pulmonary complications). One patient developed urinary incontinence. Infection was not identified in any patient. One patient had level increased due to development of kyphosis in proximal neighboring segment. Conclusion: We believe encouraging improvements can be obtained with posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery in CP scoliosis patients minimizing complications including coronal balance, sagittal balance and pelvic obliquity and there is no major disadvantage compared to the unit rod instrumentation system.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLEÇ, A., ÇİFTÇİ, S., ODABAŞI, E., YILDIRIM, A. (2018). CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY SCOLIOSIS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 147–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/195625

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bekmez S, Ozhan M, Olgun ZD, Suzer A, Ayvaz M, Demirkiran HG, Karaağaoğlu E, Yazici M. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus multiple posterior column osteotomies in severe and rigid neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 2017; Dec 29. doi: 10. 1097 / BRS. 0000 0000 0000 2538. [Epub ahead of print]. Bell D, Moseley C, Koreska J. Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of patients with progressive neuromuscular spinal deformity. Spine 1989; 14(12): 1301-1307.
  2. Berven S, Bradford D S. Neuromuscular scoliosis: causes of deformity and principles for evaluation and manage- ment. Semin Neurol 2002; 175. Dias RC, Miller F, Dabney K, Lipton G,Temple T. Surgical correction of spinal deformity using a unit rodin children with cerebral palsy. J Ped Orthop 1996; 16(6): 734-740.
  3. Edebol-Tysk K, Hagberg B, Hagberg G. Epidemiology of spastic tetraplegic cerebral palsy in Sweden-II. Prevalence, birth data and origin. Neuropediatrics 1989; 20(01): 46-52.
  4. Evans P, Evans S, Alberman E. Cerebral palsy: why we must plan for survival. Arch Dis Childhood 1990; 65(12): 1329-1333. Hägglund G, Pettersson K, Czuba T, Persson-Bunke M, Rodby-Bousquet E. Incidence of scoliosis in cerebral palsy: A population-based study of 962 young individuals. Acta Orthop Scand 2018; 1-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1450091.[Epub ahead of print]. Kalen V, Conklin MM, Sherman FC. Untreated scoliosis in severe cerebral palsy. J Ped Orthop 1992; 12(3): 337-340.
  5. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K. Adolescent idiopathic scoli- osis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83(8), 1169-1181.
  6. Lonstein JE, Koop SE, Novachek TF, Perra JH. Results and complications after spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis in cerebral palsy and static encephalopathy using Luque-Galveston instrumentation: experience in 93 patients. Spine 2012; 37(7): 583-591.
  7. Madigan RR, Wallace SL. Scoliosis in the institutional- ized cerebral palsy population. Spine 1981; 6(6): 583-590.
  8. Majd ME, Muldowny DS, Holt RT. Natural history of scoliosis in the institutionalized adult cerebral palsy population. Spine 1997; 22(13): 1461-1466.
  9. Miller A, Temple T, Miller F. Impact of orthoses on the rate of scoliosis progression in children with cerebral palsy. J Ped Orthop 1996; 16(3): 332-335.
  10. Minocha P, Sitaraman S, Sachdeva P. Clinical spectrum, comorbidities, and risk factor profile of cerebral palsy children: A prospective study. J Ped Neurosciences 20