Journals / Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Bütünleşik uçak rotalama ve bakım çizelgeleme

Concurrent aircraft routing and maintenance scheduling

Pages
73–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed approach was applied to the daily flight route-maintenance schedule problems of the domestic flights of two companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aircraft routing is the process of assigning each individual aircraft within each fleet to flight legs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The common policies in this business sector follow the practices the maintenance of an aircraft once in 3-4 days periodically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed approach was applied to the daily flight route-maintenance schedule problems of the domestic flights of two companies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aircraft routing is the process of assigning each individual aircraft within each fleet to flight legs. The Federal Aviation Rules require the maintenance of all the aircrafts after specified hours of period as mandatory. The minimum total maintenance cost is provided as a result of the lost flight time which is brought to minimum. The common policies in this business sector follow the practices the maintenance of an aircraft once in 3-4 days periodically. This policy minimizes the risk of grounding of aircraft in the cost of the lost flight hours. In this study, we propose a concurrent, mathematical modeling approach for daily flight route and maintenance scheduling based on recorded flight hours. The model has been solved using CPLEX/GAMS MILP Software. The proposed approach was applied to the daily flight route-maintenance schedule problems of the domestic flights of two companies.

Özet

Uçak rotalama, her bir filo içerisindeki her uçağın uçuş bacaklarına atanma sürecidir. Ulusal Havacılık Kuralları, belli bir uçuş saatinden sonra bütün uçaklara zorunlu olarak bakım uygulanmasını gerektirir. En düşük toplam bakım maliyeti, kullanılamayan uçuş zamanı en küçüğe getirilmesiyle sağlanır. Havacılık sektöründe izlenen genel politika her 3-4 günde periyodik olarak uçaklara bakım uygulamaktır. Bu politika, kayıp uçuş saati maliyetinde uçakların yerde kalma riskini en küçüklemektedir. Bu çalışmada, uçuş saatleri temel alınarak günlük uçuş ve rota çizelgeleme için bütünleşik matematiksel modelleme yaklaşımı önerilmiştir. Model, CPLEX/GAMS MILP yazılımı kullanılarak çözülmüştür. Önerilen yaklaşım iç hat uçuş gerçekleştiren iki şirketin günlük uçuş rota bakım çizelgeleme problemlerine uygulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, İ., KAPANOĞLU, M., KARAKOÇ, T. (2011). Bütünleşik uçak rotalama ve bakım çizelgeleme. Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 73–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/195321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. IATA, “IATA 2008 Annual Report”, International Air Transport Association, 2008
  2. Airbus, “Airbus Global Market Forecast 2009- 2028”: Airbus, 2009. [3] http://www.unece.org/trans/doc/transsitdocs/20 08turkey.pdf [4] http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno= 215701& [5] http://www.defencetalk.com/boeing-supports- and-celebrates-growth-in-the-turkish-aviation-market- 15522 [6] Kinnison, H. A., “Aviation Maintenance Management”, McGraw-Hill, New-York, 2004
  3. Orhan, I., Kapanoglu, M., Karakoc, T.H. 2007, “Flight-Hour Based Optimization for Aircraft Scheduling”, INFORMS, 369, WD43, A.B.D
  4. Orhan, I., Kapanoglu, M., Karakoc, T.H., 2010, “Planning And Scheduling Of Airline Operations”, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 16(2), 181-191, 2010
  5. Boeing, “Section 1-System Maintenance Program, 737-600/700/800/900 Maintenance Planning Document”. s.1.0-5, 2005
  6. Clarke, L.W., Johnson, E.L., Nemhauser, G.L., Zhu Z., “The Aircraft Rotation Problem”, Annals of Operations Research, 69, 33-46, 1997
  7. Gopalan, R., K. Talluri, “The Aircraft Maintenance Routing Problem”, Operations Research, 46, 260–271, 1998
  8. Radnoti, G., “Profit Strategies for Air Transportation”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002
  9. Daskin, M.S. and Panayotopoulos N.C., “A Lagrangian Relaxation Approach to Assigning Aircraft to routes in Hub and Spoke Networks”, Transportation Science, 23(2), 91-99, 1989
  10. Feo, T.A., Bard J. F., “Flight Scheduling and Maintenance Base Planning”, Management Science, 35, 1415-1432, 1989
  11. Kabbani, N.M. and Patty B.W., “Aircraft Routing at American Airlines”, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Symposium of the Airline Group of the International Federation of Operational Research Societies, Budapest, Hungary, 1992
  12. Hane, C.A., Barnhart, C., Johnson E.L., Marsten R.E., Nemhauser G.L., Sigismindi G., “The Fleet Assignment Problem: Solving A Large Scale Integer Program”, Mathematical Programming, 70, 211-232, 1995
  13. Clarke, L.W., Hane, C.A., Johnson, E.L., Nemhauser, G.L., “Maintenance and Crew Considerations in Fleet Assignment”, Transportation Science, 30, 249–261, 1996., [18] Desauliniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Dumas, Y., “Daily Aircraft Routing and Scheduling”, Management Science, 43, 841-855, 1997
  14. Barnhart, C., Boland, N.L., Clarke L.W., Johnson E.L., Nemhauser, G.L., “Flight String Models for Aircraft Fleeting and Routing”, Transportation Science, 32(3), 208-220, 1998
  15. Cordeau, J.F., Stojkovi´c, G.