Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Reexamination of the BIST 100 Stock Price Volatility with Heterogeneous Autoregressive Realized Volatility Models

BIST 100 Endeksi Hisse Senedi Fiyat Volatilitesinin Heterojen Otoregresif Gerçekleşen Volatilite Modeliyle Yeniden İncelenmesi

Pages
457–476
Publication Date
2021-05-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also detect a diurnal effect at the session level, implying that the realized volatility of the BIST 100 index is lower in the morning sessions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we employ the heterogeneous autoregressive model framework on the (half) daily returns of the BIST 100 index between the years 2016 and 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Notably, we analyze how leverage effect and jumps in the return series affect the realized volatility of the BIST 100 index.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also detect a diurnal effect at the session level, implying that the realized volatility of the BIST 100 index is lower in the morning sessions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Realized volatility · heterogenous autoregressive model · the BIST 100 index

Abstract

In this study, we employ the heterogeneous autoregressive model framework on the (half) daily returns of the BIST 100 index between the years 2016 and 2019. This framework helps us understand the short, medium, and long-term patterns of the volatility dynamics for the return series. Notably, we analyze how leverage effect and jumps in the return series affect the realized volatility of the BIST 100 index. For the analysis, we employ sixteen models, and the results from these models show that there is a leverage effect, albeit small. The effect of jumps is significant and is present either in the short-term or long-term, depending on the type of model utilized for the analysis. We also detect a diurnal effect at the session level, implying that the realized volatility of the BIST 100 index is lower in the morning sessions.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, BIST 100 Endeksi'nin 2016-2019 yılları arasındaki üç yıllık dönem için günlük getirilerinin volatilitesi, getirilerin volatilite dinamikleri üzerindeki kısa, orta ve uzun vadeli etkilerini anlamak için heterojen otoregregresive modelleme kullanılarak analiz edilmektedir. Özellikle, kaldıraç etkisinin ve getirideki sıçramaların BIST 100 Endeksi'nin volatilite dinamiklerini nasıl etkilediği araştırılmaktadır. Analiz için, on altı farklı modeli veri setine uygulanmaktadır ve bu modellerin sonuçları küçük de olsa bir kaldıraç etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlara göre sıçrama etkisi, analiz için kullanılan model türüne bağlı olarak kısa veya uzun vadede istatistiki olarak anlamlı çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca, BIST 100 Endeksinin sabah seansında gerçekleşen oynaklığın daha düşük olduğunu işaret edilerek, seans seviyesinde mevsimsel bir etki olduğu da gösterilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, B. A., İKİZLERLİ, D., YENER, H. (2021). Reexamination of the BIST 100 Stock Price Volatility with Heterogeneous Autoregressive Realized Volatility Models. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 457–476. https://ajindex.com/articles/194558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Deutsche mark–dollar volatility: intraday activity patterns, macroeconomic announcements, and longer run dependencies. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 219-265.
  2. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2010). Parametric and nonparametric volatility measurement. In Handbook of Financial Econometrics: Tools and Techniques (pp. 67-137).
  3. North-Holland. Fischer, B. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section (pp. 177-181).
  4. Bajgrowicz, P., Scaillet, O., & Treccani, A. (2016). Jumps in high-frequency data: Spurious detections, dynamics, and news. Management Science, 62(8), 2198-2217.
  5. Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (1997). Emerging equity market volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(1), 29-77.
  6. Baillie, R. T., Bollerslev, T., & Mikkelsen, H. O. (1996). Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 3-30. Barndorff‐Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2002). Estimating quadratic variation using realized variance. Journal of Applied econometrics, 17(5), 457-477.
  7. Barndorff-Nielsen O. E., Shephard N., (2006). Econometrics of Testing for Jumps in Financial Economics Using Bi-power Variation, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 1(4), 1-30.
  8. Bildik, R. (2001). Intra-day seasonalities on stock returns: evidence from the Turkish Stock Market. Emerging Markets Review, 2(4), 387-417.
  9. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.
  10. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
  11. Corsi, F. (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(2), 174-196.
  12. Corsi, F., and Reno, R. (2009). HAR volatility modeling with heterogeneous leverage and jumps. Working paper, SSRN. Corsi, F., & Reno, R. (2012). Discrete-time volatility forecasting with persistent leverage effect and the link with continuous-time volatility modeling. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(3), 368-380.
  13. Corsi, F., Pirino, D., & Renò, R. (2009). Volatility forecasting: The jumps do matter. Working paper. Corsi, F., Pirino, D., & Reno, R. (2010). Threshold bi-power variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 159(2), 276-288.
  14. Christoffersen, P. F., & Diebold, F. X. (2000). H