SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 31

YAPISAL GÜÇLENDİRME VE PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME ÖLÇEKLERİNİN GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİLİRLİK ANALİZLERİ

OLCA SÜRGEVİL EBRU TOLAY MERT TOPOYAN
Pages
0–5391
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, although original structural empowerment scale of CWEQ-II has good fit indices, it is more successfully explained the structural empowerment by forced six-factor structure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to perform validity and reliability analysis of Laschinger’s Structural Empowerment Scale (Conditions Of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II - CWEQ-II) and Spreitzer’s Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES) in order to adapt the both scales to the Turkish language.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results, although original structural empowerment scale of CWEQ-II has good fit indices, it is more successfully explained the structural empowerment by forced six-factor structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, psychological empowerment scale is confirmed as an appropriate structure by its original scale.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapısal Güçlendirme · Psikolojik Güçlendirme · Geçerlilik

Abstract

This study aims to perform validity and reliability analysis of Laschinger’s Structural Empowerment Scale (Conditions Of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II - CWEQ-II) and Spreitzer’s Psychological Empowerment Scale (PES) in order to adapt the both scales to the Turkish language. According to the results, although original structural empowerment scale of CWEQ-II has good fit indices, it is more successfully explained the structural empowerment by forced six-factor structure. Also, psychological empowerment scale is confirmed as an appropriate structure by its original scale.

Özet

Bu çalışma Laschinger’in Yapısal Güçlendirme Ölçeği (Çalışma Etkililiği Koşulları Anketi / Conditions Of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II, CWEQ-II) ile Spreitzer’in Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeğinin (Psychological Empowerment Scale, PES) Türkçe’ye uyarlanması amacıyla gerçekleştirilen geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizlerini içermektedir. Analizler sonucunda, yapısal güçlendirme ölçeğinin orijinal halinin oldukça iyi uyum değerleri gösterdiği; bununla birlikte zorlanmış altı faktörlü yapının yapısal güçlendirme kavramını ölçmekte daha başarılı olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Psikolojik güçlendirme ölçeğinin ise orijinal hali uygun bir yapı olarak doğrulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPOYAN, O. S. E. T. M. (2013). YAPISAL GÜÇLENDİRME VE PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME ÖLÇEKLERİNİN GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİLİRLİK ANALİZLERİ. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 31, 0–5391. https://ajindex.com/articles/194072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Armstrong, K.J. ve Laschinger, H. (2006) “Structural Empowerment, Magnet Hospital Characteristics, and Patient Safety Culture: Making the Link” Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 21(2):124-132.
  2. De Cicco, J., Laschinger, H. ve Kerr, M. (2006) “Perceptions of Empowerment and Respect: Effect on Nurses Organizational Commitment in Nursing Homes” Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49 Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2009), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th Ed., PrenticeHall, London, UK Hauck, A., Griffin, M.T.Q. ve Fitzpatrick, J.J. (2011) “Structural Empowerment and Anticipated Turnover Among Critical Care Nurses” Journal of Nursing Management, 19:269-276.
  3. Hu, S.L.Y. ve Leung, L. (2003) “Effects of Expectancy-Value, Attitudes, and Use of the Internet on Psychological Empowerment Experienced by Chinese Women at the Workplace” Telematics and Informatics, 20(4):365-382.
  4. Kline, R.B. (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. 2nd Edition,
  5. New York, The Guilford Press.
  6. Kluska, K.M., Laschinger, H.K.S. ve Kerr, M.S. (2004) “Staff Nurse Empowerment and Effort-Reward Imbalance” Nursing Leadership, 17(1):112-128.
  7. Knol, J. ve Van Linge, R. (2009) “Innovative Behaviour: The Effect of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Nurses” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2):359-370.
  8. Laschinger, H.K.S., Finegan, J.E., Shamian, J. ve Wilk, P. (2001) “Impact of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Job Strain in Nursing Work Settings: Expanding Kanter’s Model” Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(5):260-272.
  9. Laschinger, H.K.S., Finegan, J.E., Shamian, J. ve Wilk, P. (2003) “Workplace Empowerment as a Predictor of Nurse Burnout in Restructured Healthcare Settings” Longwoods Review, 1(3):2 Laschinger, H.K.S., Finegan, J.E., Shamian, J., Wilk, P. (2004) “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Workplace Empowerment on Work Satisfaction” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4):527-545.
  10. Laschinger, H.K.S., Finegan, J. ve Wilk, P. (2009a) “Context Matters: The Impact of Unit Leadership and Empowerment on Nurses’ Organizational Commitment” Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(5):228-235.
  11. Laschinger, H.K.S., Gilbert, S., Smith, L.M. ve Leslie, K. (2010) “Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Nurse/Patient Empowerment: Applying Kanter’s Empowerment Theory to Patient Care” Journal of Nursing Management,18:4-13.
  12. Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C. ve Morgan, G.A (2005) SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation, 2nd Edition,
  13. New Jersey, Law