Journals / Journal of Academic Research in Nursing / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Determination of Patient Opinions Related to Intensive Care Environment in Thoracic Surgery

Toraks Cerrahisinde Yoğun Bakım Ortamına İlişkin Hasta Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
133–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results of the study show that the patients had positive opinions regarding intensive care environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Receiving the opinions of patients regarding intensive care environment forms a basis for providing a a more improved intensive care environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Plan: This descriptive study was conducted with 100 patients in the surgical intensive care unit of chest surgery of a university hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results of the study show that the patients had positive opinions regarding intensive care environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Receiving the opinions of patients regarding intensive care environment forms a basis for providing a a more improved intensive care environment. The study was conducted for the purpose of examining the opinions of patients hospitalized in intensive care unit of chest surgery regarding intensive care environment. Study Plan: This descriptive study was conducted with 100 patients in the surgical intensive care unit of chest surgery of a university hospital. Materials and Methods: The patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours, extubated within two or four hours during the postoperative period, and could understand and answer the questions were included in the sample group. In the study, the “Determining the Opinions of Patients Regarding Intensive Care Environment Form” was used for determining the opinions of the patients regarding intensive care environment. Results: Mean age of the patients who participated in the study was 49±16 years. They were hospitalized in the intensive care unit for three days, on average. Majority of the patients stated that illumination level and ambient temperature in the intensive care unit were normal (88%) and the voice level was not disturbing (86%). Almost all the patients (96%) stated that they were worried about their families and 66% of them wanted their families to stay with them all the time. Majority of the patients indicated that they could easily talk to nurses (97%) and doctors (75%) about their problems and 96% stated that their privacy was respected in the intensive care unit. Conclusion: The results of the study show that the patients had positive opinions regarding intensive care environment.

Özet

Amaç: Yoğun bakım ortamına ilişkin hastaların görüşlerinin alınması iyileştirici yoğun bakım ortamı sağlanmasına temel oluşturur. Araştırma toraks cerrahi yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan hastaların yoğun bakım ortamı ile ilgili görüşlerinin incelenmesi amacı ile yapılmıştır. Çalışma Planı: Araştırma bir üniversite hastanesinin toraks cerrahi yoğun bakım ünitesinde 100 hasta ile tanımlayıcı olarak yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yoğun bakım ünitesinde en az 24 saat yatan, postoperatif dönemde iki ya da dört saat içinde ekstübe olan, soruları anlayabilecek ve yanıtlandırabilecek durumda olan hastalar örneklem grubuna dahil edilmiştir. Araştırmada hastaların yoğun bakım ortamına ilişkin görüşlerini belirlemek amacı ile “Yoğun Bakım Ortamına İlişkin Hasta Görüşleri Belirleme Formu” kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan hastaların yaş ortalaması 49±16’dır. Hastaların yoğun bakımda kalış gün sayısı ortalama 3 gündür. Hastaların çoğunluğu yoğun bakım ünitesinde aydınlatma düzeyinin ve ortam sıcaklığının normal olduğunu (%88) ve ses düzeyinin rahatsız edici olmadığını (%86) belirtmişlerdir. Hastaların tamamına yakını (%96) ailesini merak ettiğini, %66’sı aile üyelerinin sürekli yanında kalmasını istediklerini belirtmişlerdir. Hastaların çoğu hemşireye (%97) ve hekime (%75) sorunlarını rahatlıkla söyleyebildiklerini ve %96’sı yoğun bakımda mahremiyetine saygı gösterildiğini belirtmiştir. Sonuç: Araştırma sonuçları hastaların yoğun bakım ortamı ile ilgili olumlu görüşlere sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOL, E., İLASLAN, E., ÖZDEMİR, S., ERDOĞAN, A. (2018). Determination of Patient Opinions Related to Intensive Care Environment in Thoracic Surgery. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 133–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/193590

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ören B, Kaymak I, Bozkurt G. Göğüs cerrahisi hastalarının yoğun bakım ihtiyaçlarının incelenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi. 2015;2(1):55-61. Özalevli S. Toraks cerrahisinde postoperatif pulmoner rehabilitasyon. Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni. 2015;6(1):16-25.
  2. İmamoğlu OU, Doğusoy I, Okay T, Yıldırım M, Yaşaroğlu M, Aydemir B, et al. Noncardiac complications after thoracotomy. Turkish J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(4):785-8.
  3. Iyer A, Yadav S. (2013). Postoperative care and complications after thoracic surgery. Firstenberg MS. Principles and practice of cardiothoracic surgery. InTech. 2013:57- 84. Feltracco P, Serra E, Barbieri S, Milevoj M, Ori C. Postoperative care of patients undergoing lung resection. J Anesthe Clinic Res. 2012;4(288):2. Naithani U, Bajaj P, Bhatnagar N, Prasad N. One year prospective analysis of morbidity and mortality associated with thoracic surgery. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care. 2011;15(2):86-92. Meriläinen M, Kyngä H, Ala-Kokko T. Patients’ interactions in an intensive care unit and their memories of intensive care: a mixed method study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):78-87.
  4. Uğras GA, Öztekin SD. Patient perception of environmental and nursing factors contributing to sleep disturbances in a neurosurgical intensive care unit. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;212(3):299-308.
  5. Wenham T, Pittard A. Intensive care unit environment. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9(6):178-83.
  6. Stayt LC, Seers K, Tutton E. Patients’ experiences of technology and care in adult intensive care. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(9):2051-61.
  7. Chahraoui K, Laurent A, Bioy A, Quenot JP. Psychological experience of patients 3 months after a stay in the intensive care unit: A descriptive and qualitative study. Journal of Critical Care. 2015;30(3):599-605.
  8. Almerud S, Alapack RJ, Fridlund B, Ekebergh, M. Of vigilance and invisibility-being a patient in technologically intense environments. Nurse Crit Care. 2007;12(3):151-8.
  9. Tunçay GY, Uçar H. Hastaların Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinin fiziksel ortam özelliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;17(2):33- 46. Engström Å, Nyström N, Sundelin G, Rattray J. People’s experiences of being mechanically ventilated in an ICU: a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(2):88-95.
  10. Egerod I, Bergbom I, Lindahl, B, Henricson M, Granberg-Axell A, Storli, SL. The patient experience of intensive care: a meta-synthesis of Nordic studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(8):1354-61. Kesecioglu