SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ANKEM Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical samples

Klinik örneklerden anaerop bakterilerin soyutlanması ve antibiyotik duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi

Abdurrahman KİREMİTÇİ
Argun Arzu TÜRKKAN
Yurdanur AKGÜN
Gül DURMAZ
NİLGÜN KAŞİFOĞLU
Pages
132–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Metronidazole resistance was detected in one of Bacteroides spp, one of Peptostreptococcus spp., and in 18 % of all anaerobic isolates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The species and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated between January 2007 and March 2008 were analysed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 54 anaerobic isolates were recovered from 243 clinical specimens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Metronidazole resistance was detected in one of Bacteroides spp, one of Peptostreptococcus spp., and in 18 % of all anaerobic isolates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 · 33 specimens
⚙️Variables:Kültür ortamı · Anti-enfektif ajanlar · Bakteriler

Abstract

The species and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated between January 2007 and March 2008 were analysed. Isolates were identified by conventional methods. A total of 54 anaerobic isolates were recovered from 243 clinical specimens. Most common clinical specimens were blood (39.5 %) and abscess (28.8 %). Anaerobes were recovered in 33 specimens (13.6 %). Only aerobes were isolated in 74 (30.5 %), and mixed aerobes and anaerobes were recovered in 19 (7.8 %) specimens. Of the 96 anaerobe blood cultures 5 (5 %) were positive for anaerobic bacteria. The most commonly identified anaerobe bacterium was Bacteroides spp. (28 %), followed by Porphyromonas spp. (19 %) and Peptostreptococcus spp. (11 %). Beta-lactamase production was detected in 80 % of the Bacteroides spp. isolates by nitrocefin test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of ticarcillin-clavulanat, cefoxitin, imipenem, clindamycin, metronidazole, linezolid and tigecycline were determined by E-test. Ticarcillin-clavulanat and linezolid were active against all of the anaerobic isolates. Clindamycin was less active, to which 35 % of isolates were resistant. Resistance to clindamycin was most frequent among Bacteroides spp. isolates (53 %). The rate of resistance to cefoxitin was low (7 %). Imipenem and tigecycline showed good activity against all isolates, and only one B. fragilis was found resistant to imipenem and one non-fragilis Bacteroides strain to tigecycline. Metronidazole resistance was detected in one of Bacteroides spp, one of Peptostreptococcus spp., and in 18 % of all anaerobic isolates.

Özet

Ocak 2007-Mart 2008 tarihleri arasında soyutlanan anaerop bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları incelenmiştir. İzolatların tanımlanması geleneksel yöntemlerle yapılmış, toplam 243 klinik örnekten 54 anaerop izolat soyutlanmıştır. Klinik örneklerin çoğunu kan (% 39.5) ve apse örnekleri (% 28.8) oluşturmuş, örneklerin 33’ünde (% 13.6) anaerop üreme saptanmış, bunların 14’ünde (% 5.8) sadece anaerop, 19’unda (% 7.8) ise aerop ve anaeroplar birlikte üretilmiştir. Örneklerin 74’ünde (% 30.5) sadece aerop üreme gözlenmiştir. Anaerop kan kültürü yapılan 96 örneğin 5’inde (% 5) anaerop üreme saptanmıştır. Anaeroplardan en çok Bacteroides spp. (% 28), Porphyromonas spp. (% 19) ve Peptostreptococcus spp. (% 11) izole edilmiştir. Bacteroides spp. izolatların % 80’inde nitrosefin testiyle beta-laktamaz üretimi saptanmıştır. Tikarsilin-klavulanat, sefoksitin, imipenem, klindamisin, metronidazol, linezolid ve tigesiklinin minimal inhibitör konsantrasyonları E-test ile belirlenmiş, tikarsilin-klavulanat ve linezolid tüm anaerop izolatlara karşı etkin bulunmuştur. Klindamisin daha düşük etkinliğe sahip olup izolatların % 35’inde direnç saptanmıştır. Klindamisine direnç en fazla Bacteroides spp. izolatlar arasında saptanmıştır (% 53). Sefoksitine direnç düşük oranda bulunmuştur (% 7). İmipenem ve tigesiklin tüm aneroplara karşı etkin olup sadece bir B.fragilis izolatı imipeneme ve bir B.fragilis dışı Bacteroides izolatı ise tigesikline dirençli bulunmuştur. Metronidazol direnci tüm anaeropların % 18’inde ve birer B.fragilis ve Peptostreptococcus spp. izolatında saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİREMİTÇİ, A., TÜRKKAN, A. A., AKGÜN, Y., DURMAZ, G., KAŞİFOĞLU, N. (2008). Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical samples. ANKEM Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 132–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/193169

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aldridge KE, Ashcraft D, Cambre K, Pierson CL, Jenkins SG, Rosenblatt JE: Multicenter survey of the changing in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus species, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45(4):1238-43
  2. Aldridge KE, O’Brien K: In vitro susceptibilities of the Bacteroides fragilis group species: Change in isolation rates significantly affects overall susceptibility data, J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(11):4349-52
  3. Bahar H, Mamal Torun M, Demirci M: Yara enfeksiyonlarında anaerop bakterilerin dağılımı,Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2003;33(1):42-6
  4. Behra-Miellet J, Calvet L, Dubreuil L: Activity of linezolid against anaerobic bacteria, Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003;22(1):28-34
  5. Behra-Miellet J, Calvet L, Mory F et al: Antibiotic resistance among anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli: lessons from a French multicentric survey, Anaerobe 2003;9(3):105-11
  6. Betriu C, Culebras E, Gómez M, Rodríguez-Avial I, Picazo JJ: In vitro activity of tigecycline against Bacteroides species, J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56(2):349-52 7. Brazier J, Chmelar D, Dubreuil L et al: European surveillance study on antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci, Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;31(4):316-20
  7. Citron DM, Hecht DW: Susceptibility test methods: Anaerobic bacteria, “Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA (eds): Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 9. baskı” kitab›nda s.1214-22, ASM Press, Washington DC (2007)
  8. Citron DM, Warren YA, Hudspeth MK, Goldstein EJ: Survival of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in purulent clinical specimens maintained in the Copan Venturi Transystem and Becton Dickinson Port-a-Cul transport systems, J Clin Microbiol 2000;38(2):892-4
  9. Daeschlein G, Hoehne C, Assadian O et al: In vitro activity of linezolid against clinical isolates of Fusobacterium spp., J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58(4):789-93
  10. Durmaz B, Taştekin N: Anaerop enfeksiyon ön tanı l› hastaların klinik örneklerinden izole edilen anaerop bakteriler, Mikrobiyol Bült 1997;31(1):13-20
  11. Engelkrik PG, Duben-Engelkrik J: Anaerobes of clinical importance, “Mahon CR, Lehman DC, Manuselis G (eds): Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 3. baskı” kitabında s. 587-664, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis (2007)
  12. Ercis S, Tunçkanat F, Hasçelik G: Anaerobik enfeksiyon flüpheli hastalardan izole edilen anaerop bakteriler, Mikrobiol Bült 2005;39(4):447-