Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND SPINAL FUSION RESULTS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Pages
5–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: For the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, posterior instrumentation and spinal fusion surgery is an efficient and successful method with patient satisfaction, curvature correction, and low complication rates after more than ten years follow-up.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To define the relationship between radiological and functional outcomes of AIS more than10 years follow-up.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 22 AIS patients were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: For the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, posterior instrumentation and spinal fusion surgery is an efficient and successful method with patient satisfaction, curvature correction, and low complication rates after more than ten years follow-up.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To define the relationship between radiological and functional outcomes of AIS more than10 years follow-up. Methods: 22 AIS patients were reviewed retrospectively. Cobb angles were measured from full-length spinal radiography at preoperative, postoperative, mid-term and long- term follow-up. Correction rate and correction loss rate were calculated. The SRS-30 questionnaire form was filled by the patients at the final follow-up examination. Results were compared with the Mann Whitney U test and unpaired t-test. Non-parametric correlation analytical test was performed with the Spearman test. p<0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results: There were 15 female and 7 male with the mean age of 14.5. The mean follow- up was 35.8 and 134 months for mid-term and final follow-up. The mean fusion levels were 10.4 and the average of last instrumented vertebra was L 1.8. Major curvatures were corrected from 53.1° to 19.7° with a 63.6% correction rate. According to the SRS- 30 questionnaire form, the mean pain, function and activity, self-image appearance, mental health, and satisfaction scores were 4.16 ± 0.29, 4.43 ± 0.28, 4.15 ± 0.31, 3.84 ± 0.30, and 4.15 ± 0.44 at mid-term and 3.96 ± 0.52, 4.22 ± 0.38, 4.35 ± 0.22, 4.14 ± 0.36, and 4.10 ± 0.34 at final follow-up, respectively. While the mental health scores improved statistically (p=0.0214), the pain (p=0,043) and the activity (p=0.038) scores deteriorated and the satisfaction score (p=0.64) remained stable in time. A significant relationship was found between the final cobb angle and pain (p = 0.044, Rho = -0.407). When the SRS-30 results were evaluated among themselves, there was a significant correlation between function and self-image (p= 0.005, Rho = 0.547), also function and pain (p= 0.038, Rho = 0.532). Conclusion: For the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, posterior instrumentation and spinal fusion surgery is an efficient and successful method with patient satisfaction, curvature correction, and low complication rates after more than ten years follow-up.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTAR, M. K., UĞRAŞ, A. A., AKYILDIZ, M. F., GÖRGEÇ, M. (2019). POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND SPINAL FUSION RESULTS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 5–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/192852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bartie BJ, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Long-term follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had harrington instrumentation and fusion to the lower lumbar vertebrae: is low back pain a problem? Spine 2009; 34(24): E873-E878. Bastrom TP, Yaszay B, Shah SA, Miyanji F, Lonner BS, Kelly MP, Samdani A, Asghar J, Newton PO. Major complications at two years after surgery impact srs scores for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine Deformity 2019; 7(1): 93-99. Bayraktar MK. Posterior instrumentation and fusion results of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Uzmanlık Tezi, İstanbul, 2008.
  2. Benli İT, Ates B, Akalin S, Citak M, Kaya A, Alanay Minimum 10 years follow-up surgical results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with TSRH instrumentation. Eur Spine J 2007; 16(3): 381-391.
  3. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sturm PF, Sucato DJ. Patient satisfaction after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011; 36(12): 965-968.
  4. Danielsson AJ, Hallerman KL. Quality of life in middle- aged patients with idiopathic scoliosis with onset before the age of 10 years. Spine Deformity 2015; 3(5): 440-450.
  5. Green DW, Lawhorne TW, Widmann RF, Kepler CK, Ahern C, Mintz DN, Rawlins BA, Burke SW, Boachie- Adjei O. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow- up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011; 36(23): 1948-1954.
  6. Harding IJ, Charosky S, Vialle R, Chopin DH. Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5. Eur Spine J 2008; 17(2): 250-254.
  7. Iida T, Suzuki N, Kono K, Ohyama Y, Imura J, Ato A, Ozeki S, Nohara Y. Minimum 20 years long-term clinical outcome after spinal fusion and instrumentation for scoliosis: comparison of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire with that in nonscoliosis group. Spine 2015; 40(16): E922-E928. Janicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health. 2007; 12(9): 771-776.
  8. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65(9): 1302-1313.
  9. Li N, Xu C, Shen M-K, Luo M, Wang J, Xia L. Clinical outcomes of posterior pedicle screw instrumentation without osteotomy in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97(36): e12122. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, Panagopoulos G, Mothur S, Kohani U, L