Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Spatio-temporal dynamic of submerged aquatic macrophytes in Lake Sapanca

Pages
552–562
Publication Date
2020-09-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The macrophyte index results demonstrated that Lake Sapanca is at a critical level in terms of nutrient enrichment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aquatic macrophytes are one of the key components of freshwater ecosystems and contribute to ecosystem functioning and environmental sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Submerged macrophyte assemblages related to environmental parameters were investigated from February to November of 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The macrophyte index results demonstrated that Lake Sapanca is at a critical level in terms of nutrient enrichment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aquatic ecosystem · macrophyte index · ecological quality

Abstract

Aquatic macrophytes are one of the key components of freshwater ecosystems and contribute to ecosystem functioning and environmental sustainability. They are assumed to be an ideal biomonitoring tool in long-term monitoring programs implemented by the EU Water Framework Directive due to their sensitivity to environmental factors. Therefore, this study focuses on the evaluation of the ecological status in Lake Sapanca using macrophyte composition and abundance in order to make future predictions on the health of aquatic ecosystems and to form effective management. Submerged macrophyte assemblages related to environmental parameters were investigated from February to November of 2017. A total of 12 submerged macrophyte species were recorded in the littoral zone of the lake. The main findings on the most dominant 7 species of this community indicated significant differences among stations and seasons. They also revealed that submerged macrophyte density was shaped in relation to environmental variables, particularly temperature and nutrients. Submerged macrophyte assemblages reached their highest species number and biomass value (5312 gm(-2)) in summer, while no species was recorded in winter. High biomass values of these species corresponded with lower macrophyte diversity. The macrophyte index results demonstrated that Lake Sapanca is at a critical level in terms of nutrient enrichment. More frequent observation of species such as Ceratophyllum demersum and Elodea canadensis, which indicated "massive" nutrient enrichment, revealed that the ecological status of the lake varies from meso-to eutrophic at the local level.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, S., GURESEN, A., AKTAN, Y. (2020). Spatio-temporal dynamic of submerged aquatic macrophytes in Lake Sapanca. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 552–562. https://ajindex.com/articles/192719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Altinsacli Selcuk, 2013, Phytologia Balcanica, V19, P67 APHA AWWA WEF, 2012, STANDARD METHODS EXA, P1360 Aykulu G, 2006, NOVA HEDWIGIA, P325. Beck MW, 2010, ECOL INDIC, V10, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.02.006 Beishenbekova A, 2013, ANKARA U CEVREBILIML, V3, P65 Beklioglu M, 2006, ARCH HYDROBIOL, V166, P535, DOI 10.1127/0003-9136/2006/0166-0535 Bolpagni R, 2013, ANN BOT-ITALY, V3, P35, DOI 10.4462/annbotrm-10207 Bornette G, 2011, AQUAT SCI, V73, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00027-010-0162-7 Clarke K, 1994, CHANGE MARINE COMMUN, P144 COLLINS CD, 1987, AQUAT BOT, V29, P177, DOI 10.1016/0304-3770(87)90095-7 Davis P.H., 1984,
  2. FLORA TURKEY E AEGEA, VEight Demir N, 2004, 1 UL LIMN CAL KOC TU, P16 Ersoy S., 2019, European Journal of Biology, V78, P103, DOI 10.26650/EurJBiol.2019.0018 Feldmann T, 2012, THESIS. Gecheva G, 2013, TURK J BOT, V37, P99, DOI 10.3906/bot-1112-35 Golob Aleksandra, 2015, Acta Biologica Slovenica, V58, P23 Goltermann HL, 1978, METHOD PHYS CHEM ANA Heegaard E, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P397, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00119.x Hilt S, 2010, J ENVIRON QUAL, V39, P725, DOI 10.2134/jeq2009.0122 HOPSON MS, 1993, J AQUAT PLANT MANAGE, V31, P76 Huotari T, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058073 Jeppesen E., 1998, ECOLOGICAL STUDIES, V131 Johnson JA, 2011, J AQUAT PLANT MANAGE, V49, P1, DOI 10.1139/F10-124 JONES RC, 1983,
  3. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V107, P213, DOI 10.1007/BF00036690 KADONO Y, 1982, Japanese Journal of Ecology, V32, P39 Kirim Birsen, 2014, P102. Kirkagac M, 2011, ANKARA U CEVREBILIML, V3, P65 Kocic A, 2014, ACTA BOT CROAT, V73, P437, DOI 10.2478/botcro-2014-0011 Kohler A., 1978, LANDSCHAFT STADT, V10, P73 Kolada A, 2016, BIOL INVASIONS, V18, P3251, DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1212-4 Melzer A., 1999, ECOLOGICAL BASES LAK, V136, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-3282-6-17, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3282-6-17] Morkoc E, 1998, CROAT CHEM ACTA, V71, P303 Moss B, 2003, AQUAT CONSERV, V13, P507, DOI 10.1002/aqc.592 Mulderij G, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V204, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.020 Odum P, 1971, FUNDAMENTALS ECOLOGY, P574 Okgerman H, 2008, TODAV YAYINLARI, V28, P65, DOI [10.3906/zoo-1001-16, DOI 10.3906/ZOO-1001-16] Ozcelik H., 2014, Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakultesi Fen Dergisi, V9, P12 Ozen AS, 2005, DUMLUPINAR U FEN BIL, V9, P15 Ozturk M, 1996,
  4. EKOLOJI, V20, P15. Padial AA, 2008, BRAZ J BIOL, V68, P1051, DOI 10.1590/S1519-69842008000500012 Penning WE, 2008, AQUAT ECOL, V42, P253, DOI 10.1007/s10452-008-9183-x Sanal M., 20