Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Relation between soil salinity and species composition of halophytic plant communities: A baseline data inventory for wetland monitoring

Pages
493–508
Publication Date
2020-09-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Eleven distinct habitats were determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Our study sets forth the outcomes of an interdisciplinary project conducted in order to fill the information gap on the management of a wetland ecosystem, in the case of a protected area on the south-eastern coast of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The peak average annual salinity value, 1535 mS/m, was measured in a pure stand of H. strobilaceum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Eleven distinct habitats were determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Halophytes · soil salinity · Tuz Gölü lagoon

Abstract

Our study sets forth the outcomes of an interdisciplinary project conducted in order to fill the information gap on the management of a wetland ecosystem, in the case of a protected area on the south-eastern coast of Turkey. The hypothesis of the study is that the pattern of species composition reflects soil salinity level and some species can act as relevant indicators. The study aimed to discover a relationship between soil salinity and vegetation composition and establish some indicators useful for monitoring. For this aim, the temporal and spatial changes of soil salinity were monitored and the distribution of coastal habitats and associated plant communities were described. Twenty-three plant communities were described according to the species compositions of the vegetation. Soil salinity was found to be a driving factor controlling the spatial distribution of the plant taxa. The dominant species of the study area are Halocnemum strobilaceum, Arthrocnemum fruticosum, Spergularia marina, Plantago coronopus, and Atriplex portulacoides. The peak average annual salinity value, 1535 mS/m, was measured in a pure stand of H. strobilaceum. A high significant positive correlation was determined between plant species richness and life form richness. Strong evidence was detected for species richness, which declines at higher salinity habitats and there is also some evidence that species turnover is greater among the 52 sampling quadrates. Eleven distinct habitats were determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİLMAZ, K. T., AKCA, E., CAKAN, H., UNLUKAPLAN, Y., KAPUR, S. (2020). Relation between soil salinity and species composition of halophytic plant communities: A baseline data inventory for wetland monitoring. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 493–508. https://ajindex.com/articles/192716

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abrol IP, 1988, FAO SOIL B, V39. Abulfatih H. A., 2002, Qatar University Science Journal, V22, P119 Adam P., 1990, SALTMARSH ECOLOGY. Al-Mailem DM, 2010, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V101, P5786, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.082 ALBERT R, 1975,
  2. OECOLOGIA, V21, P57, DOI 10.1007/BF00345893 Aronson J, 1996, HALOPHYTES AND BIOSALINE AGRICULTURE, P55 Aronson JA, 1989, HALOPH DATA BASE SAL. Arora S., 2013, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V12, P252 Asri Y, 1997, PLANT ECOL, V132, P155, DOI 10.1023/A:1009790901167 Barth HJ, 2006, TASK VEG SC, V40, P215. Bedell JP, 2014, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V186, P183, DOI 10.1007/s10661-013-3365-2 Bilalis D, 2014, AUST J CROP SCI, V8, P178 Braun-Blanquet J., 1964, PFLANZENSOZIOLOGIE G Bucur N, 1957, STUD CERCET BIOL STI, V8, P277 Buhler D. D., 2003, Journal of Crop Production, V8, P245, DOI 10.1300/J144v08n01_10 Cakan H, 2005,
  3. ORYX, V39, P17, DOI 10.1017/S0030605305000049 Chapman VJ, 1960, PLANT SCI MONOGRAPHS. Colmer TD, 2009, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V36, P665, DOI 10.1071/FP09144 Curco i Masip A., 2001,
  4. LAZAROA, V22, P67 Duarte B, 2013, FUNCT PLANT BIOL, V40, P922, DOI 10.1071/FP12315 Flowers TJ, 2008, NEW PHYTOL, V179, P945, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x FLOWERS TJ, 1986, Q REV BIOL, V61, P313, DOI 10.1086/415032 Freitag H., 1991, FLORA VEGETATIO MUND, V9, P281 Gehu J.M., 1989, C PHYTOSOCIOLOGIQUES, V19, P591 GEHU J-M, 1989, Phytocoenologia, V17, P449 GLENN EP, 1984, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V7, P253, DOI 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11589448 Grigore M.-N., 2010, ST U CUZA IASI, V56, P21 Grigore MN, 2012, ROMANIAN SALT TOLERA. Hasanuzzaman M, 2014, BIOMED RES INT, V2014, DOI 10.1155/2014/589341 Kadereit G, 2006,
  5. TAXON, V55, P617, DOI 10.2307/25065639 Kafi M, 2008, CROP FORAGE PRODUCTI. Karaomerlioglu D, 2007, THESIS. Lymbery AJ, 2003, AUST J BOT, V51, P667, DOI 10.1071/BT02119 MjM Software Design, 2019, MJM SOFTW DES Naz N, 2010, PAK J BOT, V42, P2359. Pereira ME, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V155, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0416-1 Petillon J, 2010,
  6. WETLANDS, V30, P1097, DOI 10.1007/s13157-010-0115-x Ranwell D.S., 1972, ECOLOGY SALT MARSHES Raunkiaer C., 1937, PLANT LIFE FORMS. Romagna E, 2002, RIPRISTINO ECOLOGICO, P1 Schaefer CM, 1988, THESIS. Secmen O. E., 1978, VEGETASYON BITKI TOP, V5, P195 SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x Shaw P J A, 2003, MULTIVARIATE STAT EN. SIMPSON EH, 1949,
  7. NATURE, V163, P688, DOI 10.1038/163688a0 Tanji KK, 2002, SALINITY: ENVIRONMENT - PLANTS - MOLECULES, P21 Te