Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Achene micromorphology of the genus Potentilla L. (Rosaceae) in Iran and its systematic application

Pages
15–42
Publication Date
2021-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the results demonstrated variations in the hilum dimensions, ventral ridge thickness, lumen dimension, distance between the hilum and style scare, apical width, the distance between 2 ribs, and rib thickness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Achene micromorphological evidence belonging to 32 species of Potentilla from Iran were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The SEM observations revealed 4 types of achene shapes, 4 main types and 6 sub types of surface patterns, 3 types of wax, 8 types, 15 subtypes, and 4 categories of sculpturing, 2 types of anticlinal cell boundaries, and 3 types of outer periclinal walls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the results demonstrated variations in the hilum dimensions, ventral ridge thickness, lumen dimension, distance between the hilum and style scare, apical width, the distance between 2 ribs, and rib thickness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Achene · micromorphology · Potentilla

Abstract

Achene micromorphological evidence belonging to 32 species of Potentilla from Iran were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Multivariate analysis was used to estimate the potential contribution of the quantitative and qualitative traits to the species relationships. Based on the present results, the achene micromorphological traits exhibited considerable variations. The SEM observations revealed 4 types of achene shapes, 4 main types and 6 sub types of surface patterns, 3 types of wax, 8 types, 15 subtypes, and 4 categories of sculpturing, 2 types of anticlinal cell boundaries, and 3 types of outer periclinal walls. In addition, the results demonstrated variations in the hilum dimensions, ventral ridge thickness, lumen dimension, distance between the hilum and style scare, apical width, the distance between 2 ribs, and rib thickness. Cluster analysis and principal component analysis of the data displayed that the achene characters were taxonomically informative and can be used as reliable criteria to distinguish species of the genus. An identification key to the Iranian species of Potentilla based on the achene diagnostic micromorphological characters was presented. The evolutionary trends of some micromorphological traits were also evaluated at the sectional level.

🔖

Cite This Article

SADEGHİ, S., FAGHİR, M. B., ATTAR, F., AALAMİ, A. (2021). Achene micromorphology of the genus Potentilla L. (Rosaceae) in Iran and its systematic application. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 15–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/192691

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Andenberg A L, 1994, ATLAS SMALL FRUITS N, P1 Barthlott W., 1981, Nordic Journal of Botany, V1, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1981.tb00704.x Barthlott W., 1984, CURRENT CONCEPTPLA, P95 Bojnansky V a, 2007, ATLAS SEEDS FRUITS C, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-5362-7_1 Corner EJH, 1976, SEEDS DICOTYLEDONS. Deylami Moezi A, 2019, IRANIAN J PLANT BIOL, V10, P53 Dobes C, 2010, MOL PHYLOGENET EVOL, V56, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.005 Dowidar A.E., 2003, PAK J BIOL SCI, V6, P1778, DOI DOI 10.3923/PJBS.2003.1778.1791 Eriksen B, 1999, SKR NORSKE VIDENS MN, V38, P201 Eriksson T, 1998, PLANT SYST EVOL, V211, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF00985357 Eriksson T, 2003, INT J PLANT SCI, V164, P197, DOI 10.1086/346163 Eriksson T, 2015, PLANT SYST EVOL, V301, P171, DOI 10.1007/s00606-014-1063-3 Faghir M. B., 2015, Iranian Journal of Botany, V21, P103 Faghir MB, 2011, IRAN J SCI TECHNOL A, V35, P243 Faghir M. B., 2012, Acta Botanica Hungarica, V54, P1, DOI 10.1556/ABot.54.2012.1-2.e1 Faghir M. B, 2013, TAXONOMY BIOSYSTEMAT, V6, P31 Faghir M. B, 2011, TAXONOMY BIOSYSTEMAT, V8, P1 Faghir M.B, 2010, J TAXONOMY BIOSYST, V22, P39 Faghir MB, 2014, TURK J BOT, V38, P417, DOI 10.3906/bot-1303-67 Faghir MB, 2010, ACTA SOC BOT POL, V79, P139 Feng T, 2017, J SYSTEMATIC EVOLUTI, V51, P77 Garcia D.L.Q., 2004,
  2. POLIBOTANICA, V18, P87 Gontcharova SB, 2009,
  3. FLORA, V204, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.flora.2008.01.009 Juzepczuk S, 1941, FLORA SSSR M, V10, P1 Kalkman C, 2004, FA GE VAS P, V6, P343. Khatamsaz M, 1993, RES I FORESTS RANGEL, V6, P88 Kolodziejek J, 2007, ACTA SOC BOT POL, V76, P35 Kolodziejek J, 2010, ACTA BOT CROAT, V69, P65 Kolodziejek J, 2008, ACTA BOT CROAT, V67, P139 Koul KK, 2000, ANN BOT-LONDON, V86, P385, DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1197 Mozaffarian V., 2016, Iranian Journal of Botany, V22, P112 MURLEY MR, 1951, AM MIDL NAT, V46, P1, DOI 10.2307/2421948 Naqinezhad A, 2019,
  4. PHYTOTAXA, V392, P291, DOI 10.11646/phytotaxa.392.4.4 Potter D, 2007, PLANT SYST EVOL, V266, P5, DOI 10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9 Rohlf FJ, 2000, NTSYS PC NUMERICAL T. Schulze-Menz GK, 1964, ENGLERS SYLLABUS PFL, P209 SNEATH P H, 1973, P573. SOJAK J, 1989, Candollea, V44, P741. SOJAK J, 1987, Candollea, V42, P491. Sojak J, 2005,
  5. CANDOLLEA, V60, P59. Sojak J., 2009, Feddes Repertorium, V120, P185, DOI 10.1002/fedr.200911102 SOJAK J, 1987, Botanische Jahrbuecher fuer Systematik Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, V109, P25 Sojak J., 2006, Feddes Repertorium, V117, P486, DOI 10.1002/fedr.200611111 Sojak J, 1991, WILL