Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Presowing seed treatment with glycine betaine confers NaCl tolerance in quinoa by modulating some physiological processes and antioxidant machinery

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2021-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, quinoa accession Ames-13737 was better as compared to PI-634919 in terms of growth rate, photosynthetic properties, gas exchange parameters, enzymatic antioxidants, and yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil salinity threatens the yield and food security worldwide and use of halophytes might be a valid option to cope with devastating salinity effects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present investigation was accomplished to evaluate the role of glycine betaine (GB) as presowing seed treatment on growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange attributes, enzymatic antioxidants, lipid peroxidation (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), endogenous GB, total soluble proteins (TSP), and yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under saline conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, quinoa accession Ames-13737 was better as compared to PI-634919 in terms of growth rate, photosynthetic properties, gas exchange parameters, enzymatic antioxidants, and yield.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quinoa · glycine betaine · salinity

Abstract

Soil salinity threatens the yield and food security worldwide and use of halophytes might be a valid option to cope with devastating salinity effects. The present investigation was accomplished to evaluate the role of glycine betaine (GB) as presowing seed treatment on growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange attributes, enzymatic antioxidants, lipid peroxidation (MDA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), endogenous GB, total soluble proteins (TSP), and yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under saline conditions. Ames-13737 (Q7) and PI-634919 (Q9) quinoa accessions were used for this trial. The plants were applied with two salt stress treatments (Control and 450 mM NaCl) after 45 days of sowing. Presowing seed treatments with GB (water, 10 and 20 mM) were given for 12 h. Each treatment replicated four times through completely randomized design. Imposition of salinity triggered a major decrease in growth, photosynthetic pigments, net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), and stomatal conductance (gs), while the level of lipid peroxidation and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were enhanced. Slight increment in total soluble proteins was observed along with higher endogenous GB in quinoa under salinity. Both levels of GB increased the shoot length, shoot fresh, and dry weights in accession PI-634919 under saline regime. Photosynthetic attributes, E and gs were increased when 20 mM of GB was applied under saline conditions. Activities of antioxidant enzymes, TSP, endogenous glycine betaine and yield parameters were also increased when GB was applied. Presowing treatment with GB in quinoa plants prominently decreased the MDA and H2O2 concentration. The concentration of 10 mM GB enhanced the panicle length while 20 mM GB showed same results for 1000 seed weight and TSP under saline conditions. Overall, quinoa accession Ames-13737 was better as compared to PI-634919 in terms of growth rate, photosynthetic properties, gas exchange parameters, enzymatic antioxidants, and yield.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAQSOOD, M. F., SHAHBAZ, M., ARFAN, M., BASRA, S. M. A. (2021). Presowing seed treatment with glycine betaine confers NaCl tolerance in quinoa by modulating some physiological processes and antioxidant machinery. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/192690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abbas W, 2010, SCI HORTIC-AMSTERDAM, V125, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.008 Abdallah MM, 2020, B NATURAL RES CTR, V44, P1 Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, 2017, MIDDLE E J, V6, P315 Adolf VI, 2012, PLANT SOIL, V357, P117, DOI 10.1007/s11104-012-1133-7 Ahanger MA, 2019, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V144, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.021 Al-Dakheel AJ, 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.01090 Alasvandyari F., 2018, Desert, V23, P265 Alasvandyari F, 2017, ARCH BIOL SCI, V69, P139, DOI 10.2298/ABS160216089A Arfan M, 2007, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V164, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.05.010 ARNON DI, 1949, PLANT PHYSIOL, V24, P1, DOI 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 Ashraf M, 2007, ENVIRON EXP BOT, V59, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 Ashraf M, 2013,
  2. PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V51, P163, DOI 10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 Ashraf MA, 2018, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V123, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.023 Athar HUR, 2015, J AGRON CROP SCI, V201, P428, DOI 10.1111/jac.12120 BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 CAKMAK I, 1991, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V83, P463, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb00121.x Campo S, 2014, PLANT PHYSIOL, V165, P688, DOI 10.1104/pp.113.230268 CHANCE B, 1955, METHOD ENZYMOL, V2, P764, DOI 10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8 Chen THH, 2008, TRENDS PLANT SCI, V13, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.007 Derbali W, 2020, J PLANT INTERACT, V15, P27, DOI 10.1080/17429145.2020.1722266 El-Esawi MA, 2018, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V132, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.026 Estaji A, 2019,
  3. PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V57, P753, DOI 10.32615/ps.2019.053 Farooq M, 2009, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, P153, DOI [10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12, 10.1051/agro:2008021] GENARD H, 1991, PLANT PHYSIOL BIOCH, V29, P421 GIANNOPOLITIS CN, 1977, PLANT PHYSIOL, V59, P315, DOI 10.1104/pp.59.2.309 Gupta B, 2014, INT J GENOMICS, V2014, DOI 10.1155/2014/701596 Hasanuzzaman M., 2013, ECOPHYSIOLOGY RESPON, V1, P25, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-4747-4_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4747-4_2] Hasanuzzaman M, 2014, BIOMED RES INT, V2014, DOI 10.1155/2014/589341 Hoque MA, 2007, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V164, P1457, DOI 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.10.004 Hu LX, 2012, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V137, P38, DOI 10.21273/JASHS.137.1.38 Hussain S., 2018, ACTA PHYSIOL PLANT, V40, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S11738-017-2577-4, 10.1007/s11738-017-2577-4] Iqbal S, 2017, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V19, P933, DOI 10.17957/IJAB/15.0399 Kausar F, 2017, INT J AGRIC BIOL, V19, P321, DOI 10.17957/IJAB/15.0283 Kausar N, 2014, WORLD APPL SCI J, V29, P1559 Ko