Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Genetic Variation among Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars for Seed-Set Efficiency

Pages
229–235
Publication Date
2007-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that SSE was significantly affected by genotype and year, but not from the position of the bolls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seed-set efficiency (SSE) is one of the most important within-boll yield components in cotton production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Increased SSE can lead to increased seed number and, ultimately, to greater fiber yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that SSE was significantly affected by genotype and year, but not from the position of the bolls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cotton · seed set · genotype

Abstract

Seed-set efficiency (SSE) is one of the most important within-boll yield components in cotton production. Increased SSE can lead to increased seed number and, ultimately, to greater fiber yield. A field experiment was conducted during 2003-2004 to compare cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.), in terms of the potential for improved SSE, in a Mediterranean region (Kahramanmaraş Agricultural Research Institute). SSE changed by year by about 1%-2%, averaging 94%-95%. Mean values for cultivars ranged from 95.78% (Deltaopal) to 93.98% (Nazilli 84S) in 2003, and from 95.67% (Sayar 314) to 94.75% (Carmen) in 2004. Cultivars were significantly different (2%-3%) only for the bolls located at the bottom (1st position) of the plants. Despite the difference being small, in general, the bottom and top bolls of the plants had higher SSE than middle bolls did. Also, average yield and SSE were higher in 2004 than in 2003. The results showed that SSE was significantly affected by genotype and year, but not from the position of the bolls. Additionally, SSE was significantly and positively (r = 0.69) correlated to yield (lint, seed, and seed cotton) in 2003. Since there was no significant difference in the seed number of the bolls formed early or late in the season, bolls harvested throughout the season could be used for seed production, but further investigation of seed characters (seed vigor) is warranted.

Özet

Seed-set efficiency (SSE) is one of the most important within-boll yield components in cotton production. Increased SSE can lead to increased seed number and, ultimately, to greater fiber yield. A field experiment was conducted during 2003-2004 to compare cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.), in terms of the potential for improved SSE, in a Mediterranean region (Kahramanmaraş Agricultural Research Institute). SSE changed by year by about 1%-2%, averaging 94%-95%. Mean values for cultivars ranged from 95.78% (Deltaopal) to 93.98% (Nazilli 84S) in 2003, and from 95.67% (Sayar 314) to 94.75% (Carmen) in 2004. Cultivars were significantly different (2%-3%) only for the bolls located at the bottom (1st position) of the plants. Despite the difference being small, in general, the bottom and top bolls of the plants had higher SSE than middle bolls did. Also, average yield and SSE were higher in 2004 than in 2003. The results showed that SSE was significantly affected by genotype and year, but not from the position of the bolls. Additionally, SSE was significantly and positively (r = 0.69) correlated to yield (lint, seed, and seed cotton) in 2003. Since there was no significant difference in the seed number of the bolls formed early or late in the season, bolls harvested throughout the season could be used for seed production, but further investigation of seed characters (seed vigor) is warranted.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÖLEK, Y., OĞLAKÇI, M. (2007). Genetic Variation among Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Cultivars for Seed-Set Efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 229–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/192389

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akhalkatsi, M. and R. Lösch. 2005. Water limitation effect on seed development and germination in Trigonella coerulea (Fabaceae). Flora. 200: 493-501.
  2. Bradow, J.M., G.H. Davidonis, O. Hinojosa, L.H. Wartelle, K.J. Pratt, K. Pusateri, P.J. Bauer, B. Fisher, G.F. Sassenrath-Cole, P.H. Dastoor, A. Johnson, J.A. Landivar, D. Locke and D. Moseley. 1996. Environmentally induced variations in cotton fiber maturity and related yarn and dyed knit defects. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences (Eds.: C.P. Dugger and D.A. Richter), National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN. pp. 1279-1284.
  3. Burke, J.J. 2002. Moisture sensitivity of cotton pollen: An emasculation tool for hybrid. Agron. J. 94: 883-888.
  4. Carputo, D., L. Monti, J.E. Werner and L. Frusciante. 1999. Uses and usefulness of endosperm balance number. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 478-484.
  5. Casper, B.B. and D. Wiens. 1981. Fixed rates of random ovule abortion in Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae) and its possible relation to seed dispersal. Ecol. 62: 866-869.
  6. Christensen, C.A., S. Subramanian and G.N. Drews. 1998. Identification of gametophytic mutations affecting female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Develop. Biol. 202: 136-151.
  7. Clarke, H.J. and K.H.M. Siddique. 2004. Response of chickpea genotypes to low temperature stress during reproductive development. Field Crops Res. 90: 323-334
  8. Gervais, C., R. Trahan, D. Moreno and A.M. Drolet. 1993. Phragmites australis in Quebec: geographic distribution, chromosome numbers and reproduction. Can. J. Bot. 71: 1386-1393.
  9. Grossniklaus, U., J.-P. Vielle-Calzada, M.A. Hoeppner and W.B. Gagliano. 1998. Maternal control of embryogenesis by Medea, a polycomb group gene in Arabidopsis. Science. 280: 446-450.
  10. Gustafsson, A. and M. Simak. 1963. X-ray photography and seed sterility in Phragmites communis Trin. Hereditas. 49: 442-450.
  11. Ishii, J. and Y. Kadono. 2002. Factors influencing seed production Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 72: 129-141.
  12. Lee, T.D. 1984. Patterns of fruit maturation: a gametophyte competition hypothesis. Am. Nat. 123: 427-432. McMichael. B.L. and R.D. Powell. 1971. Effect of temperature regimes on flowering and boll development in cotton. Cott. Gr. Rev. 48: 125-130.
  13. Morgan, J.W. 1999. Effects of population size on seed production and germinability in an endangered, fragmented grassland plant. Conserv. Biol. 13: 266-273.
  14. Pearson, N.L. 1949. Mote types in cotton and their occurrence as related to variety, environment, position in lock, lock size, and number of lock