AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightFurthermore, it’s mentioned that they want to take education with student centered education methods.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate the students’ opinions about their clinical rotations, learn their level of knowledge and opinion about student centered education methods; brain storming, small group study, task based learning, problem based learning, Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE), student clinics, clinical skills education. Methods: It is a cross-sectional study. The all clinical year students were called and invited respectively to attend the study. The volunteer students answered the survey for their clinical rotations and the level of knowledge about student centered education methods. Than, researcher made a presentation to give information about student centered education methods approximatelly 40 minutes. Than a survey about students’ experience with student centered education methods and their willingness to get training with these methods were applied. Descriptive statistics was used. Results: The student assessed clinical rotations over 10 and the mean score was 5,35 (min: 1, max.: 8, SD: ±1,62). It was indicated that the students didn’t get training with student-centered education methods. Students support to use student-centered education methods; brain stroming-small group study-homework based learning (%83.9), task based learning (%87.1), OSPE(%93,5), student clinics (96,8), clinical skills laboratory educations (%96,8), in our school’s new curriculum is high. Conclusion: Clinical year students indicated that the getting feedback during clinical rotations, interdisiplinnary interactive educations, the diversity and number of patient-disease are insufficient in clinical rotations. They also support and believe that student-centered education methods have more benefits. Furthermore, it’s mentioned that they want to take education with student centered education methods.