Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 7

ANTIOCH OF PISIDIA, ROUTES AND THE BATTLE OF MYRIOKEPHALON

PİSİDİA ANTİOKHEİASI, YOLLAR VE MİRYOKEFALON SAVAŞI

Pages
99–104
Publication Date
2018-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The locations of Kumdanlı and Gelendost Yenice Gorge where the Battle of Myriokephalon, as a result of that Anatolia was domineered by Seljuks, was supposed to take place were discussed and it was concluded that the battle had not taken place near Antioch.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Antioch of Pisidia, which was on the passing intersection of the Aegean and Mediterranean regions to the Central Anatolian region, was a military city during periods of the Hellenistic, the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reason why the name of Antioch, which was one of the essential centres of Christianity and on an important intersection, was not stated in the chronicles narrating the Battle of Myriokephalon was scrutinised and the other routes which the Byzantine army could use were stated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The locations of Kumdanlı and Gelendost Yenice Gorge where the Battle of Myriokephalon, as a result of that Anatolia was domineered by Seljuks, was supposed to take place were discussed and it was concluded that the battle had not taken place near Antioch.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pisidia Antiokheiası · Miryokefalon · Antioch of Pisidia

Abstract

Antioch of Pisidia, which was on the passing intersection of the Aegean and Mediterranean regions to the Central Anatolian region, was a military city during periods of the Hellenistic, the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. The reason why the name of Antioch, which was one of the essential centres of Christianity and on an important intersection, was not stated in the chronicles narrating the Battle of Myriokephalon was scrutinised and the other routes which the Byzantine army could use were stated. The locations of Kumdanlı and Gelendost Yenice Gorge where the Battle of Myriokephalon, as a result of that Anatolia was domineered by Seljuks, was supposed to take place were discussed and it was concluded that the battle had not taken place near Antioch.

Özet

Ege ve Akdeniz Bölgelerinden İç Anadolu’ya geçiş kavşağında bulunan Pisidia Antiokheiası, Hellenistik, Roma İmparatorluk ve Bizans Dönemlerinde askeri kent olma özelliğini yitirmemiştir. Önemli bir yol kavşağında bulunan ve Hristiyanlığın haç merkezlerinden biri olan Antiokheia’nın isminin, Miryakefalon savaşını anlatan kroniklerden geçmemesi irdelenmiş ve Bizans ordusunun kullanmış olabileceği diğer yollar belirtilmiştir. Anadolu’nun Selçuklu egemenliğine geçmesini sağlayan Miryokefalon savaşının geçtiği düşünülen Kumdanlı ve Gelendost Yenice Boğazının konumları tartışılmış ve savaşın, Antiokheia yakınlarında olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZHANLI, M. (2018). ANTIOCH OF PISIDIA, ROUTES AND THE BATTLE OF MYRIOKEPHALON. Selçuk Üniversitesi Selçuklu Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 7, 99–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/192071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adnan Eskikurt, Myrionkefalon Savaşı’na Dair Kronikler ve Modern Çalışmalar, USAD, Bahar 2017; (6). John Julius Norwich, Bizans Gerileme ve Çöküş Dönemi (M. S. 1082 – 1453), 2013.
  2. Ksenophon, Anabasis, (trc. H. Örs), 1975 İstanbul. Mehmet Akif Ceylan – Adnan Eskikurt, Tarihi Coğrafya Açısından Myriokefalon Savaşı (17Eylül 1176) ve Konya Bağırsak Boğazı, Eylül 2017
  3. Konya. Niketas Khoniates, Historia (Ioannes ve Manuel Komnenos Devirleri), (trc. F. Işıltan), TTK, Ankara 1995.
  4. Ramazan Topraklı, Değişen Coğrafya ve Miryokefalon Savaşı, Semih Ofset, Ankara 2011.
  5. William Mitchell Ramsay, Anadolu’nun Tarihi Coğrafyası, (trc. M. Pektaş), MEB. İstanbul 1960.