Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Relate with Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices?

Pages
80–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study with a such result, therefore POP-Q evaluation should be a useful parameter for future IUD expulsion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We designed this study to demonstrate the risk factors of intrauterine devices (IUD) expulsion.STUDY DESIGN: Eighty patients applied IUD evaluated in terms of their IUD expulsions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of ages, gravidity, parity, BMI, previous expulsion of intrauterine devices, delivery type, length of the endometrial cavity and the measure of Ap, Bp, C, D, TVL distances of POP-Q scores (p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study with a such result, therefore POP-Q evaluation should be a useful parameter for future IUD expulsion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We designed this study to demonstrate the risk factors of intrauterine devices (IUD) expulsion.STUDY DESIGN: Eighty patients applied IUD evaluated in terms of their IUD expulsions. Risk factors recorded were; age, gravidity, parity, BMI, previous expulsion of intrauterine devices,delivery type, length of the endometrial cavity POP-Q scores and sonographic correct IUD location.Statistically analysis was performed by Mann Whitney U test, Logarithmic transformation and Logisticregression analysis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of ages, gravidity, parity, BMI, previous expulsion of intrauterine devices, delivery type, length of the endometrial cavity and the measure of Ap, Bp, C, D, TVL distances of POP-Q scores (p>0.05). The measure of Aa, Ba,Gh, Pb distances were statistically significantly lower in IUD expulsion group (p<0.05).CONCLUSION: As interestingly; we found that POP-Q assessment should be a promising marker inpredicting IUD expulsion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study with a such result, therefore POP-Q evaluation should be a useful parameter for future IUD expulsion.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, M., AKSOY, R. T., TOKMAK, A., ERKILINÇ, S., GÜZEL, A. İ., ERYILMAZ, Ö. G., TAŞCI, Y. (2016). Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Relate with Expulsion of Intrauterine Devices?. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 80–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/190625

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. NEJ M 2012;366(21):1998-2007. Epub 2012/05/25. Zhang J, Feldblum PJ, Chi IC, Farr MG. Risk factors for copper T IUD expulsion: an epidemiologic analysis. Contraception 1992;46(5):427-33. Epub 1992/11/01. Aoun J, Dines VA, Stovall DW, Mete M, Nelson CB, Gomez-Lobo V. Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and gynecology 2014;123(3):585-92. Epub 2014/02/07. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunc- tion. Am J obstet and gynecol 1996;175(1):10-7. Epub 1996/07/01. Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condi- tion of pelvic organ support defects. Am J obstet and gy- necol 2005;192(3):795-806. Epub 2005/03/05. Badi SS, Foarfa MC, Rica N, Grosu F, Stanescu C. Etiopathogenic, therapeutic and histopathological aspects upon the anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Romanian j mor- phology and embryology 2015;56(2 Suppl):765-70. Epub 2015/10/03. Merki-Feld GS, Schwarz D, Imthurn B, Keller PJ. Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion. Eur j obstet gynecol reprod biology 2008;137(1):92-6. Epub 2007/03/14. Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura GM, Eisenberg DL, Peipert JF. Association of age and parity with in- trauterine device expulsion. Obstetrics and gynecology 2014;124(4):718-26. Epub 2014/09/10. Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Stanwood NL. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2010(6): CD001777. Epub 2010/06/18. Gürbüz A. Karateke A. Kabaca C. Gedikbaşı Ali. A clini- cal study concerning sacrocolpopexy with prolene mesh and combinated operations in cases with vaginal vault eversion. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2002;8(3):223-5.