Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

ANALİTİK AĞ SÜRECİ YAKLAŞIMIYLA ÜÇÜNCÜ PARTİ LOJİSTİK (3PL) FİRMA SEÇİMİ

Pages
95–113
Publication Date
2013-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This proposed model was applied in a bussiness firm successfully.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The third part logistic (3PL) includes some certain parts or whole of the firm’s logistic activities performed by the outsider companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, in the global competitive environment, selecting the appropriate 3PL firm has a significiant effect upon the competitive capacity of the firm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This proposed model was applied in a bussiness firm successfully.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lojistik · Üçüncü Parti Lojistik (3PL) · Analitik Ağ Süreci

Abstract

The third part logistic (3PL) includes some certain parts or whole of the firm’s logistic activities performed by the outsider companies. Today, in the global competitive environment, selecting the appropriate 3PL firm has a significiant effect upon the competitive capacity of the firm. In this case; selecting the optimum 3PL firm with an effective and applicable model is very important for the bussiness firms.. In this study, an appropriate 3PL firm-choosing model was developed. In this model we applied the analytic network process (ANP) which is one of the multiple-criteria desicion making methods which considers the dependencies between the material factors and includes the quantitive and qualitative datas into the process. The network topology of the desicion making model and used factors were assigned by reviewing and considering the articles published in international indexed journals and the views of the experts in their fields. This proposed model was applied in a bussiness firm successfully.

Özet

Üçüncü parti lojistik (3PL), firmanın lojistik faaliyetlerinin bir kısmını ya da tamamını dışarıdan yabancı firmalar tarafından yerine getirilmesini kapsamaktadır. Günümüzde küresel rekabet ortamında 3PL firmanın doğru olarak seçilmesi, işletmenin rekabet gücü üzerinde ciddi etki yapmaktadır. Bu durumda; işletmeler için etkin ve uygulanabilir bir modelle en uygun 3PL firma seçimi çok önemli olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada bir işletme için en uygun 3PL firma seçimi karar modeli geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen modelde, nicel ve nitel verileri sürece katan ve sonucu etkileyen faktörler arasındaki bağımlılığı dikkate alan çok ölçütlü karar verme tekniklerinden olan analitik ağ süreci (AAS) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Karar modelinin ağ yapısı ve kullanılan faktörler, uluslararası indeksli dergilerde, konferanslarda ve sempozyumlarda yayımlanan çalışmalar incelenerek ve sahasında uzman kişilerin görüşleri dikkate alınarak belirlenmiştir. Önerilen model bir işletmede başarı ile uygulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, T., ÖZBEK, A. (2013). ANALİTİK AĞ SÜRECİ YAKLAŞIMIYLA ÜÇÜNCÜ PARTİ LOJİSTİK (3PL) FİRMA SEÇİMİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 95–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/19056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agarwal, A. ve Shankar, R. (2003), “On-line trust building in e-enabled supply chain”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(4), ss.324-334.
  2. Aguezzoul, A., Rabenasolo, B. ve Jolly-Desodt, A. M. (2006), “Multicriteria decision aid tool for third-party logistics providers’ selection”, International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Troyes, France, ss.912–916.
  3. Araz, C., Özfırat, P. M. ve Özkarahan, I. (2007), “An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management”, Computer and Operations Research, 34(12), ss.3738–3756.
  4. Ashenbaum, B., Maltz, A. ve Rabinovich, E. (2005), “Studies of Trends in Third-Party Logistics Usage: What Can We Conclude?”, Transportation Journal, 44(3), ss. 44. Atmaca, E. ve Başar, H. B. (2012), “Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP)”, Energy, 44(1), ss.555-563.
  5. Azadi, M.ve Saen, R. F. (2011), “A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, ss.12231–12236.
  6. Balaban, Y. ve Baki, B. (2010), “Analitik ağ süreci yaklaşımıyla en uygun katı atık bertaraf sisteminin belirlenmesi: Trabzon ili örneği”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(3), ss.183-193.
  7. Bhatti, R. S., Kumar, P. ve Kumar, D. (2010), “A Fuzzy AHP model for 3PL selection in Lead Logistics Provider scenarios”, Enterprise Information Systems and Implementing IT Infrastructures: Challenges and Issues, ss.261-277.
  8. Bobylev, N. (2011), “Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process”, Automation in Construction, 20(8), ss.1030-040.
  9. Bottani, E. ve Rizzi, A. (2006), “A Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology to Support Outsourcing of Logistic Services”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), ss.294-308.
  10. Cao, J., Cao, G. ve Wang, W. (2007a), “A hybrid MCMD integrated borda function and gray rational analysis for 3PL selection”, Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, IEEE International Conference on, ss.215-220.
  11. Cao, J., Wang, W. ve Cao, G. (2007b), “Integration of the Social Welfare Function and TOPSIS Algorithm for 3PL Selection”, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Fourth International Conference on, ss.596600. Cheng, Eddie. W. L. ve Li, H. (2005), “Analytic Network Process Applied to Project Selection”, Journal of Construction Engineernig and Ma