SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The standardization study of the stroop test TBAG form in children between 6-11 years of age

Stroop testi TBAG formu'nun 6-11 yaş grubu çocuklarda standardizasyon çalışması

BİRİM GÜNAY KILIÇ
İlden Aylin KOÇKAR
Metehan IRAK
Şahnur ŞENER
SİREL KARAKAŞ
Pages
86–99
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were discussed in the light qf the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is; 1) to find the norms of the Stroop Test TBAG Form in the 6-11 year old age group, 2) to conduct a reliability analysis by the test-retest method, 3) to assess the development of the cognitive properties such as attention and inhibition which the test measures and 4) to find the age/grade and sex effects on the development of cognitive properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The subjects were 402 students 1st through 5th grades, between the ages of 6-11 (72-132 months).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were discussed in the light qf the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dikkat · İnhibisyon (psikoloji) · Çocuk

Abstract

The aim of this study is; 1) to find the norms of the Stroop Test TBAG Form in the 6-11 year old age group, 2) to conduct a reliability analysis by the test-retest method, 3) to assess the development of the cognitive properties such as attention and inhibition which the test measures and 4) to find the age/grade and sex effects on the development of cognitive properties. Method: The subjects were 402 students 1st through 5th grades, between the ages of 6-11 (72-132 months). The subjects were equally distributed to age/grade and sex groups. The first grade students were between 72-84 months, second grade students were between 85-96 months and 3rd, 4th and 5th grades were between 97-108, 109-120 and 121-132 months respectively. Results: Testretest reliability analysis was conducted on 92 subjects.The reliability coefficients for the time scores were found to chan. ge between .63 and .81. The time scores were found to be reliable, thus further analysis were conducted on these scores. Sex main effect was found for the time scores of the 4th and 5th parts. Age/grade x sex interaction effect was significant for the part three time score. Discussion: The results of this study indicated that all time scores decreased as age/grade increased and this was statistically significant. The results were discussed in the light qf the literature.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı Stroop Testi TBAG Formu'nun 6-11 yaş grubu denekler üzerinde norm değerlerini belirlemek, testin test-tekrar test yöntemiyle güvenirlik, çalışmasını yapmak, testin ölçtüğü bilişsel özelliklerin (ketleme ve dikkat) gelişimini değerlendirmek ve bu gelişime yaş/sınıf ve cinsiyet değişkenlerinin etkisini belirlemektir.Yöntem: Çalışmanın ömeklemini 72-132 ay (6-11 yaş) arası 1.-5. sınıfta okuyan 402 denek oluşturmuş, denekler yaş/sınıf ve cinsiyetin düzeylerine dengeli olarak dağılmıştır. Birinci sınıf 72-84 ay, 2. sınıf 85-96 ay, 3. sınıf 97-108 ay, 4. sınıf109-120 ay ve 5. sınıf 121-132 ay aralığında yer alan öğrencilerden oluşmuştur. Bulgular: Stroop Testi TBAG Formu tamamlama süresi puanları için 92 denekten test-tekrar test tekniği ile hesaplanan güvenirlik katsayıları incelendiğinde güvenirlik katsayılarının .63 ile .81 arasında değiştiği ve tüm katsayıların anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada Stroop Testi TBAG Formu'nun uygulanmasından elde edilen süre puanlan güvenilir bulunmuş ve analizler bu puanlar üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Bölüm 4 ve 5 tamamlama süreleri puanlarında ise cinsiyet temel etkisi anlamlı bulunmuştur. Yaş/sınıf x cinsiyet ortak etkisinde Stroop Testi TBAG Formu Bölüm 3 süre puanlarında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Tartışma: Araştırmanın bulguları yaş/sınıf artışına paralel olarak tüm süre puanlarının kısaldığını ve bu etkinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgular ilgili yazın bağlamında tartışılmışür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, B. G., KOÇKAR, İ. A., IRAK, M., ŞENER, Ş., KARAKAŞ, S. (2002). The standardization study of the stroop test TBAG form in children between 6-11 years of age. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 86–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/190409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Andersen SL, Teicher MH (2000) Sex differences in dopamin receptors and their relevance to ADHD, Newosci Biobehav Rev 24: 137-141
  2. Baral I (1996) Obsesif-kompuLsif bozukluğun nörop¬sikolojik değerlendirmesi (Basılmamış uzmanlık tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul 3. Barkley RA, Grodzinsky G, DuPaul G. (1992) Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: a review and research report J Abnorm Child Psychol 20:163-188
  3. Barkley RA. (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unify¬ing theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121:65-94
  4. Bench CJ, Frith CD, Grasby PM ve ark. (1993) Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop Test. Neuropsychologia 31(9):907-922
  5. Bush G, Frazier JA, Ranch SL ve ark. (1999) Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention deficit/ hyperactivitiy disorder reveald by JMRI and the Counting Stroop. Biol Psychiatry 45:1542-1552
  6. Bush G, Luu P, Posner ML (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cog Sd 4(6):215-222
  7. Carter CS, Krener P, Chaderjian M ve ark. (1995) Abnormal processing of irrelevent information in atten¬tion deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 56:59-70
  8. Cerella J, Hale S. (1994) The rise and fall in information-processing rates over the life span. Ada Psychol 86:109-197
  9. Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL. (1990) On the con¬trol of automatic processes: a parallel distributed pro¬cessing account of the Stroop effect Psychol Rev 97:332-361
  10. Cottrell D (1998) Causes of disorder, II. A review of the research finding. Seminars in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry içinde, D Black ve D Cottrell (ed) Gaskell, s.39-53
  11. Dao-Castellana MH, Samson Y, Legault F ve ark. (1998) Frontal dysfunction in neurological normal chronic alco¬holic subjects: metabolic and neuropsychological find¬ings. Psychol Med 28(5):1039-1048
  12. Funahashi S. (2001) Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex. Newosci Res 39:147-165
  13. Fuster JM. (2000) Memory networks in the prefrontal cortex. Progress in Brain Research, Vol 122 içinde, EA Mayer ve CB Saper (ed) Elsevier Science BV s:309-316
  14. Gerstadt CL, Hong YJ, Diamond A (1994) The relation¬ship between cognition and action: Performance of 3-7-year-old children on a Stroop-like day-night test. J Cognition 53:129-153
  15. Glaser WR, Glaser MO. (1989) Context effect in Stroop-like word and pictur