Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

CLINICAL RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN THORACOLUMBAR (T6- L5) VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 111 PATIENTS WITH 140 FRACTURED SEGMENTS

Pages
199–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is a reliable and effective technique for the treatment of pain due to osteoporotic and traumatic VCFs or metastatic lesions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Object: Vertebroplasty was first applied by Harve Deramond to a patient with vertebral hemangioma in 1984.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In recent years, the increase in the number of osteoporosis, trauma and tumor cases has increased the incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is a reliable and effective technique for the treatment of pain due to osteoporotic and traumatic VCFs or metastatic lesions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Object: Vertebroplasty was first applied by Harve Deramond to a patient with vertebral hemangioma in 1984. In recent years, the increase in the number of osteoporosis, trauma and tumor cases has increased the incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Nowadays, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been a widely used treatment for painful acute VCFs. It is a minimally invasive technique. In this procedure, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is injected into the vertebral corpus. There are PMMA’s ability to increase stability at fracture site, thermal necrosis effect and chemotoxic effect on intra-osseous pain receptors. In this study, the safety and efficacy of PVP in patients with VCF were evaluated. Methods: The patients who underwent PVP under sedoanalgesia or general anesthesia for single or multi-level thoracolumbar vertebrae fracture were reviewed retrospectively between January 2012 and March 2018. The study included 111 patients with VCF. 140 vertebral levels were treated with PVP. These VCFs were evaluated in 3 groups as osteoporotic, traumatic and pathological. We used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain severity. Our patients were followed up for 12 month after PVP. Results: Patients mean age was 73,04 ± 7,17 years (91-56 years) and 18 (16,22 %) were male and 93 (83,78 %) were female. The most commonly affected vertebrae were T12 and L1 vertebrae corpus. Following PVP, VAS and ODI values decreased significantly in the last 12 months compared to preoperative levels (p<.001). Cement leakage was occurred in six patients (5.40 %). Conclusions: PVP is an advantageous method. Because the procedure is fast and easy, a biopsy can be taken during the procedure, patients can soon stand up and be discharged; its complications are much less than open surgery. In addition to general anesthesia, it can be performed with sedoanalgesia. It is a reliable and effective technique for the treatment of pain due to osteoporotic and traumatic VCFs or metastatic lesions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGER, Ö., KAPLAN, N. (2019). CLINICAL RESULTS OF PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY IN THORACOLUMBAR (T6- L5) VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES: RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 111 PATIENTS WITH 140 FRACTURED SEGMENTS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 199–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/189952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Afzal S., Dhar S., Vasavada N.B., Akbar S. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic fractures. Pain Physician 2007; 10: 559–563
  2. Al-Nakshabandi NA. Percutaneous vertebroplasty complications. Ann Saudi Med 2011; 31(3): 294–297
  3. Alexandru D, So W. Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. Perm J 2012; 16(4): 46–51
  4. Constantin C, Albulescu DM, Diţă DR, Georgescu CV, Deaconu AC. Vertebral body clinico-morphological features following percutaneous vertebroplasty versus the conservatory approach. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2018; 59(1): 159-164
  5. Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, Assaker R, Demondion X, Leblond D, Chastanet P, Duquesnoy B, Deramond H. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 1998; 18(2): 311–320
  6. Denaro V, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Denaro L. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2009; 6(2): 125–130
  7. Do HM, Jensen ME, Marx WF, Kallmes DF. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral osteonecrosis (Kummell’s spondylitis). Neurosurg Focus 1999; 7: e2
  8. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 1987; 33(2): 166–168
  9. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39(12): 1410– 1414
  10. Hargunani R, Le Corroller T, Khashoggi K, Murphy KJ, Munk PL. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: the status of vertebroplasty and current controversies. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011; 15(2): 117–124
  11. Hemama M, El Fatemi N, Gana R. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in Moroccan patients with vertebral compression fractures. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 26: 225. doi:10.11604/pamj.2017.26.225.9872
  12. Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OEH, Di Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WPT. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376(9746): 1085–1092
  13. Lapras C, Mottolese C, Deruty R, Lapras C, Remond J, Duquesnel J. [Percutaneous injection of methyl-metacrylate in osteoporosis and severe vertebral osteolysis (Galibert’s technic). Ann Chir 1989; 43: 371–376. 14.