Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

ANALYSIS OF THE VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS AMONG BORSA ISTANBUL SUB-SECTOR INDICES

BORSA İSTANBUL ALT SEKTÖR ENDEKSLERİ ARASINDAKİ OYNAKLIK YAYILIMLARININ ANALİZİ

Pages
1015–1032
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that Asian Crisis, Russia Crisis, 1999 Earthquake, 2002 general election, 2003 Gulf War, Gezi Park events, 17-25 December operations, Central Bank interest policies and industry-specific events also had effects on spillovers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Investors may prefer sectoral diversification in order to reduce the portfolio risk.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with this purpose The DCC-GARCH analysis is applied to the series which are determined based on 2001 Financial Crisis and 2008 Global Crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that Asian Crisis, Russia Crisis, 1999 Earthquake, 2002 general election, 2003 Gulf War, Gezi Park events, 17-25 December operations, Central Bank interest policies and industry-specific events also had effects on spillovers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Investors may prefer sectoral diversification in order to reduce the portfolio risk. In this case, investors should determine the relationships between the sectors properly in order to make healthy investment decisions. Especially crises directly affect volatility spillovers between the sectors. In this context, it is aimed to determine the effects of crises and different types of shocks on volatility spillovers among Borsa İstanbul (BIST) sub-sector indices. In accordance with this purpose The DCC-GARCH analysis is applied to the series which are determined based on 2001 Financial Crisis and 2008 Global Crisis. The results indicate that Asian Crisis, Russia Crisis, 1999 Earthquake, 2002 general election, 2003 Gulf War, Gezi Park events, 17-25 December operations, Central Bank interest policies and industry-specific events also had effects on spillovers.

Özet

Yatırımcılar portföy riskini azaltmak amacıyla sektörel çeşitlendirmeye gidebilmektedir. Bu durumda sağlıklı yatırım kararlarının verilebilmesi için sektörler arasında ilişkilerin doğru bir şekilde belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. Özellikle krizler sektörler arasındaki oynaklık yayılımları üzerinde doğrudan etkili olmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada krizlerin ve farklı tipteki şokların Borsa İstanbul (BİST) alt sektör endeksleri arasındaki oynaklık yayılımları üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca uygun olarak 2001 Finansal Krizi ve 2008 Küresel Krizi baz alınarak belirlenen dönemler için DCC-GARCH analizi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar Asya Krizi, Rusya krizi, 1999 Depremi, 2002 genel seçimi, 2003 Körfez Savaşı, Gezi Parkı olayları, 17-25 Aralık operasyonları, Merkez Bankası faiz politikaları ile sektörlere özgü olayların yayılımları etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMIŞLI, M., SEVİL, G. (2018). ANALYSIS OF THE VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS AMONG BORSA ISTANBUL SUB-SECTOR INDICES. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1015–1032. https://ajindex.com/articles/189522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Caporin, M. (2013). Equity and CDS sector indices: Dynamic models and risk hedging. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.004
  2. Chang, C., McAleer, M., & Tansuchat, R. (2013). Conditional correlations and volatility spillovers between crude oil and stock index returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.002
  3. Chiang, T. C., Jeon, B. N., & Li, H. (2007). Dynamic correlation analysis of financial contagion: Evidence from Asian markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(7), 1206-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.06.005
  4. Dimitriou, D., Kenourgios, D., & Simos, T. (2013). Global financial crisis and emerging stock market contagion: A multivariate FIAPARCH–DCC approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.05.008
  5. Durai, S. R. S., & Bhaduri, S. N. (2011). Correlation dynamics in equity markets: evidence from India. Research in International Business and Finance, 25(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2010.07.002
  6. Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation. Journal of Business and Economic, 20(3), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487
  7. Engle, R. F., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation MVGARCH. NBER Working Paper Series No: 8554, University of California. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8554
  8. Guesmi, K., Kaabia, O., & Kazı, I. (2013). Does shift contagion exist between OECD stock markets during the financial crisis?. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7651
  9. Hinojales, M., & Park, C. (2011). Stock market integration: Emerging East Asian’s experience. The dynamics of Asian financial integration. (Ed: M. B. Devereux, P. R. Lane, C. Park, & S. Wei). Oxon: Routledge, 172-203. https://www.adb.org/publications/dynamics-asian-financial-integration-facts-and-analytics
  10. Horng, W., & Chyan, J. (2009). A DCC analysis of two stock market returns volatility with an oil price factor: An evidence study of Singapore and Thailand’s stock markets. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 4(1), 63-69. http://www.globalcis.org/jcit/ppl/jcit040110.pdf
  11. Hwang, E., Min, H., Kim, B., & Kim, H. (2013). Determinants of stock market comovements among US and emerging economies during the US financial crisis. Economic Modelling, 35, 338-348. h