Journals / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Association Between Coronary Artery Ostial Diameter Ratio and Stenotic Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography

Pages
193–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As an easily calculated parameter from angiographic images, CAOD-R may be useful in the further risk assessment of CAD patients undergoing elective coronary angiography.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Besides the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, there are numerous anatomical and functional parameters that affect the coronary atherosclerosis and subsequent stenotic coronary artery disease (CAD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Previous studies reported a significant association between coronary artery diameter and stenotic CAD.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As an easily calculated parameter from angiographic images, CAOD-R may be useful in the further risk assessment of CAD patients undergoing elective coronary angiography.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Besides the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, there are numerous anatomical and functional parameters that affect the coronary atherosclerosis and subsequent stenotic coronary artery disease (CAD). Previous studies reported a significant association between coronary artery diameter and stenotic CAD. However, no study has investigated the association between the ratio of ostial diameter of the main coronary arteries and stenotic CAD. We aimed to investigate whether coronary artery ostial diameter ratio (CAOD-R), which is calculated as dividing the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostial diameter by the right coronary artery (RCA) ostial diameter, was associated with the presence of stenotic CAD in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-six patients who underwent elective coronary angiography were included in the study. CAOD-R was calculated from digital angiograms for all patients, and patients were divided into two groups as CAOD-R ≤ 1or >1. The groups were compared regarding the frequency of patients with stenotic CAD, and the association of CAOD-R with the presence of stenotic CAD was investigated. Results: According to calculated CAOD-R, 142 (32.6%) patients were in the CAOD-R ≤1 group and 294 (67.4%) patients were in the CAOD-R >1 group. Patients with CAOD-R ≤1 had significantly higher frequency of stenotic CAD compared to patients with CAOD-R >1 (61.9% vs 41.1%, p 1 patient group (28.9% vs 18.2%, p=0.002). There were no differences between the groups regarding the frequency of stenotic lesions in LMCA and left circumflex artery. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAOD-R was an independent predictor of stenotic CAD (Odds ratio: 0.824, 95% confidence interval: 0.721-0.947, p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that CAOD-R was an independent predictor of stenotic CAD in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. As an easily calculated parameter from angiographic images, CAOD-R may be useful in the further risk assessment of CAD patients undergoing elective coronary angiography.

🔖

Cite This Article

EYÜBOĞLU, M., EYÜBOĞLU, C. (2020). Association Between Coronary Artery Ostial Diameter Ratio and Stenotic Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 193–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/189422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2005;111:3481-8
  2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016;133:e38-360
  3. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes Eur Heart J 2020;41:407- 77
  4. Hajar R. Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease: Historical Perspectives. Heart Views 2017;18:109-14
  5. Yan B, Yang J, Fan Y, et al. Association of coronary dominance with the severity of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in Shaanxi Province, China BMJ Open 2018;8:e021292
  6. Nwasokwa ON, Weiss M, Gladstone C, Bodenheimer MM. Effect of coronary artery size on the prevalence of atherosclerosis Am J Cardiol 1996;78:741-6
  7. Zhou FF, Liu YH, Ge PC, et al. Coronary Artery Diameter is Inversely Associated with the Severity of Coronary Lesions in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;43:1247-57
  8. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756- 824
  9. D’Agostino Sr RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. the Framingham Heart Study Circulation 2008;117:743-53
  10. Peng L, Guo X, Gao Y, et al. Impact of right coronary dominance on triplevessel coronary artery disease Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11685
  11. Makaryus AM, Dhama B, Raince J, et al. Coronary artery diameter as a risk factor for acute coronary syndromes in Asian-Indians. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:778-80
  12. Sakamoto S, Takahashi S, Coskun AU, et al. Relation of distribution of coronary blood flow volume to coronary artery dominance. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1420-4.