Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 7

Assessment of acid mine drainage formation using geochemical and static tests in Mutki (Bitlis, SE Turkey) mineralization area

Pages
1189–1210
Publication Date
2020-11-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thanks to these planned applications, surface and groundwater pollution can be efficiently prevented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, geochemical analyses, as well as short-term contact leaching and acid-base accounting tests, were carried out to determine the occurrence of acid mine drainage (AMD) by static tests in the ore stockpile areas at the Mutki Cu-Fe-Cr deposit (Bitlis, SE Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pH (3.27-4.05) values of water samples, together with the classification of the intracontinental water resources, indicated that the water quality is the fourth class.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thanks to these planned applications, surface and groundwater pollution can be efficiently prevented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Acid mine drainage · acid base accounting · contact leaching

Abstract

In this study, geochemical analyses, as well as short-term contact leaching and acid-base accounting tests, were carried out to determine the occurrence of acid mine drainage (AMD) by static tests in the ore stockpile areas at the Mutki Cu-Fe-Cr deposit (Bitlis, SE Turkey). According to the short-term contact leaching tests, the high enrichment in trace element concentrations in ore-bearing samples, especially in potentially toxic metals such as Cr, Cu, Mn, and Zn, were directly related to sulphide and oxide mineralizations. The pH (3.27-4.05) values of water samples, together with the classification of the intracontinental water resources, indicated that the water quality is the fourth class. Leaching tests, paste pH (3.42-4.46) and sulphide-sulphur (3.9-13.4 wt%) values also suggested that there was AMI) production potential in the mineralization area. The AMI) production potential was supported by the high mobility of several elements, such as Fe, Mg, Cr, As, Cu, S, and Zn. In ore samples, net neutralization potential (NNP) and net potential ratio (NPR) values were less than -20 kg CaCO3/t and 1, respectively. The basalts forming the basement rock of the stockpile area were characterized by permeable to slightly permeable properties that potentially increase the contamination risk of the groundwater due to seepage in the stockpile area. In order to prevent seepage in the stock area, geomembrane (synthetic waterproofing covers) should be laid at the base to ensure impermeability. The improvements planned in the stock area were modeled by the finite element method and seepage discharges at a depth of 5 m were determined as 1.34 x 10(-17)m(3)/s. Thanks to these planned applications, surface and groundwater pollution can be efficiently prevented.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUCER, M. A., ALEMDAG, S., AKARYALİ, E. (2020). Assessment of acid mine drainage formation using geochemical and static tests in Mutki (Bitlis, SE Turkey) mineralization area. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 7, 1189–1210. https://ajindex.com/articles/189318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Adedokun T.A., 2016, INT J RECENT INNOVAT, V4, P126, DOI [10.1007/s12303-019-0017-8., DOI 10.1007/S12303-019-0017-8] Akaryali E, 2018, DOGAL AFETLER VE CER, V4, P192 Akcil A, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P1139, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006 Alemdag S, 2020,
  2. YERBILIMLERI, V41, P56. Alemdag S, 2015, ARAB J GEOSCI, V8, P1099, DOI 10.1007/s12517-013-1236-3 Baba A, 2004, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V22, P676, DOI 10.1504/IJEP.2004.006057 Balci N, 2018, MINE WATER ENVIRON, V37, P56, DOI 10.1007/s10230-017-0470-4 Betrie GD, 2015, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V4, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2015.07.004 BLOWES DW, 1990, APPL GEOCHEM, V5, P327, DOI 10.1016/0883-2927(90)90008-S Boon M, 1998,
  3. HYDROMETALLURGY, V48, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0304-386X(97)00072-8 Bouffard SC, 2006,
  4. HYDROMETALLURGY, V84, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.05.008 Bouzahzah H, 2014, MINE WATER ENVIRON, V33, P54, DOI 10.1007/s10230-013-0249-1 Bradham W.S., 1991, 2 INT C AB AC DRAIN, V1, P157 Brady K, 2000, PREDICTION WATER QUA, P8. Brodie MJ, 1991, P 2 ICARD, V3, P119. Brown E.T., 1981, ISRM SUGG METH ROCK. Brunner B, 2008, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V270, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.019 Caraballo MA, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P3613, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.003 Caraballo MA, 2009, APPL GEOCHEM, V24, P2301, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.09.007 Cidu R, 2009, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V100, pV, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2008.06.002 Cimen O, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7391-9 De Capitani L, 2014, PERIOD MINERAL, V83, P223 Deere D.U., 1964, ROCK MECH ENG GEOLOG, V1, P16, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00038-4 Delibalta MS, 2016, J ENG SCI, V5, P73. Descostes M, 2004, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V68, P4559, DOI 10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.012 Dold B, 2017, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V172, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.09.014 Dold B, 2014, MINERALS-BASEL, V4, P621, DOI 10.3390/min4030621 Dold B, 2009, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V100, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2008.05.002 EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1994, 530R94012 EPA USEPA EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1994, 530R94036 EPA USEPA Erguler GK, 2020, ARAB J GEOSCI, V13, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-05372-0 Erguler GK, 2014, MINER ENG, V55, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.09.008 Farid AT, 2017, INT J GEOTECHNICAL G, V11, P948 Ferguson K, 1991, P 2 INT C AB AC DRAI, P83 Ficklin WH, 1992, WATER ROCK INTERACTI, P381 Frostad SR, 2003, MINING ENV SUDBURY 2, P231 Gleisner M, 2006, CHEM GEOL, V225, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.020 Gray NF, 1997, ENVIRON GEOL, V30, P6