Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6

Nature of clays in Late Cretaceous dacitic rocks in the eastern Sakarya Zone (NE Turkey): a geochemical and isotopic approach

Pages
831–852
Publication Date
2020-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Oxygen and hydrogen stable isotope values, K-Ar dating of Mites, and textural and chemical evidence suggest that clays might have formed mainly by alteration of minerals in dacitic rocks with hydrothermal fluids of magmatic origin during the Campanian under acidic-weak alkaline conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Late Cretaceous felsic rocks are common in the eastern Pontides (NE Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The polytype of illite is 2M(1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Oxygen and hydrogen stable isotope values, K-Ar dating of Mites, and textural and chemical evidence suggest that clays might have formed mainly by alteration of minerals in dacitic rocks with hydrothermal fluids of magmatic origin during the Campanian under acidic-weak alkaline conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Clay minerals · Late Cretaceous altered dacites · hydrothermal alteration

Abstract

Late Cretaceous felsic rocks are common in the eastern Pontides (NE Turkey). These rocks developed as an island arc from the Jurassic to the Miocene; they also host numerous volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. The Late Cretaceous dacites that outcrop around Zigana Mountain (Gumushane, NE Turkey) were exposed to intensive hydrothermal alteration. Widespread hydrothermal alteration of Late Cretaceous dacite in Zigana Mountain has led to the formation of well-developed clay minerals. Their main alteration products are sericite, chlorite, and carbonates (ankerite and calcite). The clay minerals identified by X-ray diffraction and differential thermal analysis include illite, chlorite, small amounts of kaolinite, and smectite. The polytype of illite is 2M(1). Illites formed as a result of hydrothermal alteration of feldspars; they are also Fe- and Mg-poor. Chlorite is characterized by decreasing Fe/(Fe+ Mg) ratio with increasing alteration grade and has a trioctahedral structure. Chlorite geothermometer calculations (100-300 degrees C) reflect the activities of hydrothermal solutions. Chlorite forms in more alkaline conditions compared with illite, as its formation is associated with the presence of carbonates. Oxygen and hydrogen stable isotope values, K-Ar dating of Mites, and textural and chemical evidence suggest that clays might have formed mainly by alteration of minerals in dacitic rocks with hydrothermal fluids of magmatic origin during the Campanian under acidic-weak alkaline conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİPAHİ, F., GUCER, M. A., SADİKLAR, M. B. (2020). Nature of clays in Late Cretaceous dacitic rocks in the eastern Sakarya Zone (NE Turkey): a geochemical and isotopic approach. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 6, 831–852. https://ajindex.com/articles/189400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abdioglu E, 2015, ORE GEOL REV, V66, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.10.017 Abdioglu E, 2009, TURK J EARTH SCI, V18, P139, DOI 10.3906/yer-0806-7 Akaryali E, 2016, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V117, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.12.012 Akaryali E, 2016, ORE GEOL REV, V74, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.11.013 Akaryali E, 2013, GEOSCI FRONT, V4, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2012.12.002 Akyurek S, 2014, GUMUSHANE U J SCI TE, V4, P77 Altun Y, 1972, MTA REPT, P1. Arslan M, 1997, CHEM ERDE-GEOCHEM, V57, P157 Barnes H.L., 1979, GEOCHEMISTRY HYDROTH, V2nd ed. BARRETT TJ, 1991, ECON GEOL BULL SOC, V86, P406, DOI 10.2113/gsecongeo.86.2.406 BARRETT TJ, 1993, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V48, P135, DOI 10.1016/0375-6742(93)90003-5 Basibuyuk Z, 2019, B Miner Res Explor, V158, P141, DOI 10.19111/bulletinofmre.461255 Bektas O, 1999, GEOL J, V34, P95, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1034(199901/06)34:1/2 3.0.CO;2-J Boztug D, 2004,
  2. TECTONOPHYSICS, V382, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.01.001 Buser S, 1973, MTA B, V81, P22. CAGATAY MN, 1993, ECON GEOL BULL SOC, V88, P606, DOI 10.2113/gsecongeo.88.3.606 Callaghan T, 2001, ECON GEOL BULL SOC, V96, P1073, DOI 10.2113/96.5.1073 CATHELINEAU M, 1985, CONTRIB MINERAL PETR, V91, P235, DOI 10.1007/BF00413350 CATHELINEAU M, 1988, CLAY MINER, V23, P471, DOI 10.1180/claymin.1988.023.4.13 Celik M, 1999, CLAY CLAY MINER, V47, P708, DOI 10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470604 Ciftci E, 2005, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V86, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.02.001 Ciftci E, 2005, TURK JEOL BULT, V48, P55 CLAUER N, 1993, CHEM GEOL, V103, P1, DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(93)90287-S CLAYTON RN, 1963, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V27, P43, DOI 10.1016/0016-7037(63)90071-1 Dana JD, 1993, MANUEL MINERALOGY, P681. Deer W.A., 1992, INTRO ROCK FORMING M, P696 Dokuz A, 2011, GONDWANA RES, V19, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2010.09.006 ELLIOTTMEADOWS SR, 1991, ECON GEOL BULL SOC, V86, P486, DOI 10.2113/gsecongeo.86.3.486 Eyuboglu Y, 2014, ORE GEOL REV, V59, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.11.009 Gedik A., 1992, TURKIYE JEOLOJI B, V35, P15 Guilbert JM, 1985, GEOL ORE DEPOSIT+, P985 Gumus A, 1998, IC OLAYLARA BAGLI MA. Gundogdu MN, 1984, I NAT CLAY S CUK U A, P319 Guven IH, 1993, DOGU KARADENIZ BOLGE. Herrmann W., 2002, GEOCHEM-EXPLOR ENV A, V2, P361, DOI DOI 10.1144/1467-787302-010 Hill IG, 2000,
  3. GEOLOGY, V28, P923, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)028 2.3.CO;2 Hoefs J., 1973, STABLE ISOTOPE GEOCH. Hoefs J., 1987, STABLE ISOTOPE GEOCH, V3 HORTON DG, 1985, CONTRIB MINERAL PETR, V91, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF00377764 Inoue A, 199