Journals / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

An event-driven WSN MAC protocol design based on active node and dynamic time slot allocation

Pages
812–824
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Utilizing the proposed ANDM, we present that the M-BMA well supersedes its classical counterpart, offering up to approximately 49% better energy usage as well as up to about 68% fewer message delays.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The unique features of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) make them suitable for a wide range of applications in many different areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, with many of the protocols and algorithms used in traditional wireless networks, it is usually neither feasible nor possible to apply them directly to WSNs due to the strict resource constraints of tiny sensor nodes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Utilizing the proposed ANDM, we present that the M-BMA well supersedes its classical counterpart, offering up to approximately 49% better energy usage as well as up to about 68% fewer message delays.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:WSN · MAC · active node

Abstract

The unique features of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) make them suitable for a wide range of applications in many different areas. However, with many of the protocols and algorithms used in traditional wireless networks, it is usually neither feasible nor possible to apply them directly to WSNs due to the strict resource constraints of tiny sensor nodes. Moreover, application-specific approaches for communication protocols are usually imposed since WSN applications have distinct requirements. In this study, event-driven WSN applications, where a number of sensor nodes are randomly and densely deployed in remote and difficult to reach locations, are targeted. In such applications, energy efficiency and latency are crucial design parameters since replacing or recharging the batteries of sensor nodes is extremely difficult, and any sensed data should be transmitted eventually. Considering this aspect, conventional time division multiple access-based medium access control (MAC) protocols are not well suited, although there are a few MAC protocols specifically designed for event-driven WSNs. In this paper, we introduce a MAC protocol, named modified bit-map--assisted (M-BMA), for event-driven WSN applications, designed by employing a new active node determination method (ANDM) and dynamic time slot allocation approach. Utilizing the proposed ANDM, we present that the M-BMA well supersedes its classical counterpart, offering up to approximately 49% better energy usage as well as up to about 68% fewer message delays.

Özet

The unique features of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) make them suitable for a wide range of applications in many different areas. However, with many of the protocols and algorithms used in traditional wireless networks, it is usually neither feasible nor possible to apply them directly to WSNs due to the strict resource constraints of tiny sensor nodes. Moreover, application-specific approaches for communication protocols are usually imposed since WSN applications have distinct requirements. In this study, event-driven WSN applications, where a number of sensor nodes are randomly and densely deployed in remote and difficult to reach locations, are targeted. In such applications, energy efficiency and latency are crucial design parameters since replacing or recharging the batteries of sensor nodes is extremely difficult, and any sensed data should be transmitted eventually. Considering this aspect, conventional time division multiple access-based medium access control (MAC) protocols are not well suited, although there are a few MAC protocols specifically designed for event-driven WSNs. In this paper, we introduce a MAC protocol, named modified bit-map--assisted (M-BMA), for event-driven WSN applications, designed by employing a new active node determination method (ANDM) and dynamic time slot allocation approach. Utilizing the proposed ANDM, we present that the M-BMA well supersedes its classical counterpart, offering up to approximately 49% better energy usage as well as up to about 68% fewer message delays.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAZAK, N., ERTÜRK, İ., ETEM, -. (2013). An event-driven WSN MAC protocol design based on active node and dynamic time slot allocation. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 812–824. https://ajindex.com/articles/188621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey”, Computer Networks, Vol. 38, pp. 393–422, 2002.
  2. C. Buratti, A. Conti, D. Dardari, R. Verdone, “An overview on wireless sensor networks technology and evolution”, Sensors Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 6869–6896, 2009.
  3. I. Stojmenovic, S. Olariu, “Data-centric protocols for wireless sensor networks”, in: Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures (Ed., I. Stojmenovic), pp. 417–456,
  4. New York, Wiley, 2005.
  5. A. Mainwaring, R. Szewczyk, J. Anderson, J. Polastre, “Habitat monitoring on Great Duck Island”, Proceedings of the ACM SenSys, 2004.
  6. T. Antoine-Santoni, J.F. Santucci, E. de Gentili, X. Silvani, F. Morandini, “Performance of a protected wireless sensor network in a fire analysis of fire spread and data transmission”, Sensors Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 5878–5893, 2009.
  7. J. Lloret, M. Garcia, D. Bri, S. Sendra, “A wireless sensor network deployment for rural and forest fire detection and verification”, Sensors Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 8722–8747, 2009.
  8. A. Arora, P. Dutta, S. Bapat, V. Kulathumani, H. Zhang, V. Naik, V. Mittal, H. Cao, M. Demirbas, M. Gouda, Y. Choi, T. Herman, S. Kulkarni, U. Arumugam, M. Nesterenko, A. Vora, M. Miyashita, “A line in the sand: a wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking”, Computer Networks, Vol. 46, pp. 605–634, 200 G. Simon, M. Mar´ oti, A. L´ edeczi, G. Balogh, B. Kusy, A. N´ adas, G. Pap, J. Sallai, K. Frampton, “Sensor networkbased countersniper system”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 1–12, 2004.
  9. W. Su, E. Cayirci, O.B. Akan, “Overview of communication protocols for sensor networks”, in: Handbook of Sensor Networks: Compact Wireless and Wired Sensing Systems (Eds., M. Ilyas, I. Mahgoub), pp. 374–392,
  10. Boca Raton, FL, USA, CRC Press, 2004.
  11. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, “Medium access control in wireless sensor networks”, USC/ISI Technical Report ISI-TR-580, USC/Information Sciences Institute, 2003.
  12. B. Tavli, W. Heinzelman, “TRACE: Time reservation using adaptive control for energy efficiency”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 21, pp. 1506–1515, 2003.
  13. B. Tavli, W. Heinzelman, “MH-TRACE: Multi-hop time reservation using adaptive control for energy efficiency”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 22, pp. 942–953, 2004.
  14. K. Sohraby, D. Minoli, T. Znati, Wireless Sensor Networks: Technology, Protocols, and Applications, Ne