Journals / KBB-Forum / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

COMPARISON OF AUDIOLOGICAL RESULTS IN TEFLON AND TITANIUM PISTON IN STAPEDOTOMY SURGERY

STAPEDOTOMİ CERRAHİSİNDE TEFLON VE TİTANYUM PİSTONUN ODYOLOJİK SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
193–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to audiological results, ease of piston placement and fixation, any likely complication that may occur due to the piston after surgery and associated costs are some factors to consider in piston selection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Different types of pistons are used in otosclerosis surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method and Materials: A retrospective study was carried out on 32 patients who underwent 0.5 mm stapedotomy, using teflon piston and titanium a`Wengen CliP-piston were included in the study. between 2006 and 2017Air and bone conduction threshold values at 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz were analyzed in the preoperative and postoperative audiological examinations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to audiological results, ease of piston placement and fixation, any likely complication that may occur due to the piston after surgery and associated costs are some factors to consider in piston selection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Different types of pistons are used in otosclerosis surgery. This study examines the hearing results obtained after placement of Teflon and titanium prosthesis materials in primery stapes surgery. Method and Materials: A retrospective study was carried out on 32 patients who underwent 0.5 mm stapedotomy, using teflon piston and titanium a`Wengen CliP-piston were included in the study. between 2006 and 2017Air and bone conduction threshold values at 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz were analyzed in the preoperative and postoperative audiological examinations. Findings: This study includes 32 patients, 16 of whom received Teflon piston, and the other 16 received Titanyum a`Wengen CliPpiston. Statistically significant improvements were seen in the post-operative average air bone passage threshold values and ranges in both groups. Comparing the hearing results of two different types of pistons didn't show any statistically significant difference. Result: Similar postoperative audiological results were obtained from teflon and titanium piston groups. In addition to audiological results, ease of piston placement and fixation, any likely complication that may occur due to the piston after surgery and associated costs are some factors to consider in piston selection.

Özet

Giriş: Otosklerozda cerrahisinde birçok çeşit piston kullanılmaktadır. Bu araştırmada primer stapes cerrahisinde kullanılan teflon ile titanyum protez materyali sonrası işitme sonuçları araştırıldı. Yöntem ve Gereçler: 2006-2017 yılları arasında otoskleroz nedeniyle 0,5 mm stapedotomi yapılan, teflon piston ve Titanyum a`Wengen CliP-piston kullanılan hastalar dahil edildi. Preoperatif ve postoperatif odyolojik incelemede 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 ve 4000 Hz'deki hava kemik yolu eşik değerleri incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışma 16'sına Teflon piston, 16 'sına Titanyum a`Wengen CliP-piston takılmış olan 32 hasta dahil edildi. Her iki grupta cerrahi sonrası hava, kemik yolu ortalama eşiklerinde ve hava-kemik yolu aralığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzelme saptandı. İki farklı piston tipi işitme sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Sonuç: Her iki teflon ve titanyum piston grubunda benzer postoperatif odyolojik sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Piston seçiminde odyolojik sonuçlarla birlikte piston yerleştirme ve fiksasyon kolaylığı ile cerrahi sonrası pistona bağlı gelişen komplikasyonlar ve maliyet de göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKATALAY, Z. Ç., HASANOVA, A., BAYDAN, M., YILMAZ, S., MEÇO, C. (2019). COMPARISON OF AUDIOLOGICAL RESULTS IN TEFLON AND TITANIUM PISTON IN STAPEDOTOMY SURGERY. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 193–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/188154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Massey BL, Kennedy RJ, Shelton C. Stapedectomy outcomes: titanium versus teflon wire prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(2):249-252
  2. Topdağ DO, Topdağ M, Aydın O, Keskin G, Öztürk M, İşeri M. Evaluation of efficacy of otosclerosis surgery on hearing outcomes. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2014; 24(3):137- 147
  3. Fisch U. Stapedotomy versus stapedectomy. Am J Otol 1982; 4:112-117
  4. Persson P, Harder H, Magnuson B. Hearing results in otosclerosis surgery after partial stapedectomy, total stapedectomy and stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 117: 94-99
  5. Gjuric M, Rukavina L. Evolution of stapedectomy prostheses over time. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;65:174-178
  6. Brar T, Passey JC, Agarwal AK. Comparison of hearing outcome using a Nitinol versus Teflon prosthesis in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132(11):1151-1154
  7. Shea JJ. Forty years of stapes surgery. Am J Otol 1998;19:52-55
  8. Tange RA, Grolman W. An analysis of the air-bone gap closure obtained by a crimping and a non-crimping titanium stapes prosthesis in otosclerosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2008; 35(2):181-184
  9. Slattery WH, House JW. Prostheses for stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:253-264
  10. Reineke U, Ebmeyer J, Plett D, Winkler H, Sudhoff H. Superelastic nitinol stapes prostheses. Laryngorhinootologie 2010; 89(5):271-275
  11. Bast F, Schrom T. First experiences with the new soft-clip piston as an alloplastic prosthesis during stapedotomy. Laryngorhinootologie 2009; 88(5):304-308
  12. Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, et al. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186-187
  13. Schwager K. Titanium as an ossicular replacement material.Am J Otol 1998;19:569-573
  14. Raske M, Welling JD, Gillum T, Welling DB. Long-term stapedectomy results with the McGee stapes prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2001;111:2060-2063
  15. Mangham CA. Platinum ribbon-Teflon piston reduces device failure after stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:108-113
  16. Kos ML, Montandon PB, Guyot JP. Short and long-term results of stapedotomy and stapedectomy with Teflon-wire piston prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhin Otolaryngol 2001;10: 907- 911
  17. Elonka DR, Derlacki EL, Harrison WH. Stapes prosthesis comparison. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982;90:263-265
  18. Bansal M. Teflon Implants Versus Titanium Implants in Stapes Surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):16-19.