Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

FOLLOW-UP OF THE DEGENERATIVE PROCESS WITH MRI AFTER ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISC SURGERY

Pages
105–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Degeneration of the adjacent segment is seen almost 1/5, which has a higher prevalence in used blade-peek cage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy is a common procedure in neurosurgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients include 44 segments with anterior cervical discectomy from 2014-2015 were invited to follow-up and investigated with preoperative and postoperative MRI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Degeneration of the adjacent segment is seen almost 1/5, which has a higher prevalence in used blade-peek cage.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2014-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy is a common procedure in neurosurgery. MRI can be used for the diagnosis of the disease and follow up. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative period and adjacent segment disease with MRI after the anterior cervical disc surgery. Material and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients include 44 segments with anterior cervical discectomy from 2014-2015 were invited to follow-up and investigated with preoperative and postoperative MRI. Median follow-up was 19 months. Results: Prevalence of Modic changes and uncovertebral hypertrophy were higher in the postoperative period (P<0.001). Degeneration of the adjacent segments were seen 22.7% postoperatively. The adjacent segments degeneration was higher in blade-peek cage than peek cage (P=0.026). All patients showed type 3 Modic changes after 30 months and uncovertebral hypertrophy was detected after 36 months in the postoperative period. Conclusion: After the anterior cervical disc surgery, degenerative endplate changes and uncovertebral hypertrophy increase in course of time. Type 3 Modic changes and uncovertebral hypertrophy occur in all patients at the end of the 3 years after the surgery. Degeneration of the adjacent segment is seen almost 1/5, which has a higher prevalence in used blade-peek cage.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNRENDE, M. E., EKİN, E. E. (2019). FOLLOW-UP OF THE DEGENERATIVE PROCESS WITH MRI AFTER ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISC SURGERY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 105–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/188014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arunkumar MJ, Rajshekhar V. Artifacts in magnetic resonance images following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: report of two cases. Br J Neurosurg 1998; 12(6): 553-555
  2. Brandoff JF, Silber JS, Vaccaro AR. Contemporary alternatives to synthetic bone grafts for spine surgery. Am J Orthop 2008; 37: 410-414
  3. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 1958; 15: 602-617
  4. Dardis RM, Hosban M, Gullan RW. Carbon fiber implant in anterior cervical disc surgery. In: Quinones-Hinojosa A (Ed.), Schmidek&Sweet: Operative Neurosurgical Tecniques, Fourth ed., Saunders, Philadelphia 2000; pp: 1979-1986
  5. Kasımcan O, Kaptan H, Cakıroglu K, Kılıc C. Early term results of Peek cage in cervical disc herniation. Arch Neuropsychiatry 2009; 46: 98-101
  6. Larsson EM, Holtas S, Cronqvist S, Brandt L. Comparison of myelography, CT myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylosis and disc herniation pre-and postoperative findings. Acta Radiol 1989; 30: 233–239
  7. Li GL, Hu JZ, Lu HB, Qu J, Guo LY, Zai FL. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22(3): 460-467
  8. Li J, Li Y, Wei J, Shen Y. A study on the cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion in accordance with Modic changes with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 2015; 10: 11. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0146-8 9. Luschka H. Die halbgelenke des menschlichen körpers. Eine monographie. Reimer, Berlin 1858
  9. McConnell JR, Freeman BJ, Debnath UK, Grevitt MP, Prince HG, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. Spine 2003; 28: 317-323
  10. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21(4): 288-292
  11. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 1988; 168: 177-186
  12. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166: 193- 199
  13. Omeis I, DeMattia J, Hillard VH, Murali R, Das K. History of instrumentation of subaxial cervical spine. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16(1): E10
  14. Orofino C, Sherman MS, Schechter D. Luschka’s joint-a degenera