SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of The Anterior Chamber Depth of Cases with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Using Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug and The IOL-Master Methods

Psödoeksfoliasyon Sendromunda Ön Kamara Derinliğinin Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug Topografi ve IOL-Master Yöntemleri ile Karşılaştırılması

Yasemin DERE
ŞERİFE BAYRAKTAR
BELGİN İZGİ
Selver Selen ÇAĞMAN
Pages
292–295
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were no signifi cant differences in ACD measures between PS eyes and healthy control subjects (p=0.126, p=0.296).Conclusion: Anterior chamber depth measurements with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug are more shallow so this technique may be warranting to be aware of the complications that may develop during anterior segment surgery in both groups

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome by using Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug, IOL-Master methods and healthy control subjectsMaterial and Methods: Fifty eyes of fi fty patients who had been diagnosed with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and 50 healthy control subjects were evaluated at Istanbul Faculty of Medicine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The paired t-test and Pearson correlation analysis were used in statistical analysis.Results: Average ACD value in PS eyes were 2.57±0.32mm (1.78-3.51) with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug topography and 2.82±0.38mm (1.82-3.85) with the IOL-Master.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were no signifi cant differences in ACD measures between PS eyes and healthy control subjects (p=0.126, p=0.296).Conclusion: Anterior chamber depth measurements with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug are more shallow so this technique may be warranting to be aware of the complications that may develop during anterior segment surgery in both groups
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome by using Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug, IOL-Master methods and healthy control subjectsMaterial and Methods: Fifty eyes of fi fty patients who had been diagnosed with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and 50 healthy control subjects were evaluated at Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. All patients underwentcomplete ophthalmologic examination including measurement of visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, fundoscopy, and intraocular pressure measurement with an applanation tonometer. ACD measurements were obtained by using Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug (Oculus, Germany) and IOL-Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany). The paired t-test and Pearson correlation analysis were used in statistical analysis.Results: Average ACD value in PS eyes were 2.57±0.32mm (1.78-3.51) with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug topography and 2.82±0.38mm (1.82-3.85) with the IOL-Master. The difference between two methods was statistically signifi cant (p<0.001). The correlation between two methods was high degree (r= 0.671). Average ACD value in healthy control subjects were 2,60±0.31mm (2.04-3.24), with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug topography and 2.97±0.38mm (2.01-3.59)with the IOL-Master. The difference between two methods was statistically signifi cant (p<0.001). The correlation between two methods was intermediate degree (r= 0.513). There were no signifi cant differences in ACD measures between PS eyes and healthy control subjects (p=0.126, p=0.296).Conclusion: Anterior chamber depth measurements with the Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug are more shallow so this technique may be warranting to be aware of the complications that may develop during anterior segment surgery in both groups

Özet

Amaç: Psödoeksfoliasyon sendromlu olgularda ön kamara derinliğinin Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug topografi , IOL-Master yöntemleri ve kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırılması.Gereç ve Yöntemler: İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı Glokom Departmanı'nda biyomikroskobik muayene sırasında psödoeksfoliasyon bulgusu saptanan 50 hastanın 50 gözü çalışmaya alındı. Kontrol grubu olarak rutin göz muayenesi normal olan 50 olgunun 50 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Çalışmaya alınan tüm hastaların görme keskinliği, biomikroskopik ön ve arka segment muayenesi, aplanasyon tonometresi ile göz içi basınçları ölçümü, Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug (Oculus, Almanya) ve IOL-Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Almanya) kullanılarak ön kamara derinliği ölçümü değerleri kaydedildi. İki yöntem arasında sonuçların karşılaştırılmasındaki farkın önemi bağımlı gruplarda t-testi ile yöntemler arasındaki korelasyon ise Pearson korelasyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. İstatistiksel anlamlılık için p<0.05 kabul edilmiştir.Bulgular: Psödoeksfoliasyon sendromlu olgularda ön kamara derinliği Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug ile ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri 2.57±0.32mm (1.78-3.51), IOL-Master ile 2.82±0.38mm (1.82-3.85) ölçülmüştür. Cihazlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede fark vardır (p<0.001) Pearson Korelasyon analizi sonucunda yüksek derecede pozitif korelasyon saptanmıştır (r= 0,671). Kontrol grubunda ön kamara derinliği Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug ile ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri 2,60±0.31mm (2.04-3.24), IOL-Master ile 2.97±0.38mm (2.01-3.59) ölçülmüştür. Cihazlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede fark vardır (p<0.001) Pearson Korelasyon analizi sonucunda orta derecede pozitif korelasyon saptanmıştır (r= 0.513). Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug ve IOL-Master ile yapılan ölçümler sonucunda ÖKD değerlerinde PES grubu ile kontrol grubu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktur (p=0.126, p=0.296).Sonuç: Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug tekniği ile ÖKD ölçümü her iki grupta daha dar bulunmuştur. Ön segment cerrahisi sırasında gelişebilecek komplikasyonlara karşı dikkatli olunması açısından her iki grupta Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug tekniği ile de ölçüm yapılması uyarıcı nitelikte olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

DERE, Y., BAYRAKTAR, Ş., İZGİ, B., ÇAĞMAN, S. S. (2017). Comparison of The Anterior Chamber Depth of Cases with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome by Using Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug and The IOL-Master Methods. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 292–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/186397

References (9)

  1. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Koca MR, Naumann GOH, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: ocular manifestation of a systemic disorder? Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110: 1752-6
  2. Cosar, C. Banu, and A. Bozkurt Sener. Orbscan corneal topography system in evaluating the anterior structures of the human eye. Cornea 2003; 22.2: 118-21
  3. Pascucci, S. E. Comprehensive analysis, clinical benefi ts. Surgical screening and planning using the Pentacam. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1041-4
  4. Sheng, H. U. A. N., Carol A. Bottjer, and Mark A. Bullimore. Ocular component measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster.Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 1: 27-34
  5. Küchle M, Viestenz A, Martus P, et al. Anterior chamber depth and complications during cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 281-5
  6. Meinhardt B, Stachs O, Stave J, Beck R, Guthoff R. Evaluation of biometric methods for measuring the anterior chamber depth in the non-contact mode. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244: 559-64 7. Bartholomew RS. Anterior champer depth in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1980; 64: 322-3
  7. Moreno-Montanes, J. Quinteiro, A. A., Alvarez, S. A., & Alcolea, P. A. (1989). Exfoliation syndrome: clinical study of the irido-corneal angle. Journal francais d'ophtalmologie, 1989; 13: 4; 183-8
  8. Arnarsson A, Damji KF, Sverrisson T, Sasaki H, Jonasson F. Pseudoexfoliation in the Reykjavik Eye Study: prevalence and related ophthalmological variables. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85: 822-7
  9. Acar, Banu Torun, et al. Psödoeksfoliasyon Sendromlu Olgularda Ön Segment Parametrelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Ophthalmol 2010; 40: 76-79 11. Lanzl IM, Merté RL, Graham AD. Does head positioning infl uence anterior chamber depth in pseudoexfoliation syndrome? J Glaucoma 2000; 9:2 14-8 12. Doganay, Selim, et al. Evaluation of Pentacam-Scheimpfl ug imaging of anterior segment parameters in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 2012; 95: 2; 218-22 13. Zheng X, Sakai H, Goto T et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography analysis of clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome: evidence of bilateral involvement and morphologic factors related to asymmetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 5679-84 14. Praveen, V. Association between anterior chamber depth and outcome of cataract surgery ineyes with pseudo exfoliation syndrome. IOSR Journal of