Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Angulation Deformity After Remodelling of Pediatric Femoral Fractures

Pages
261–266
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, there was no difference with regard to LLDs between the groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Although there is a consensus on the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children aged <4 years and adolescents, the treatment method is still controversial for children between aged 4 and 10 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to investigate the healing capacity of femoral shaft fractures in 4–10-year-old patients who were treated non-surgically and to compare the clinical and radiological results with the surgically treated patients in the same age group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, there was no difference with regard to LLDs between the groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Although there is a consensus on the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children aged <4 years and adolescents, the treatment method is still controversial for children between aged 4 and 10 years. Therefore, different kinds of treatment methods are described. The aim of the present study was to investigate the healing capacity of femoral shaft fractures in 4–10-year-old patients who were treated non-surgically and to compare the clinical and radiological results with the surgically treated patients in the same age group. Methods: A total of 59 patients between aged 4 and 10 years were included in the study. The study included 18 (31%) females and 41 (69%) males. The mean age of the patients was 6.9 (4–10) years. The mean follow-up period was 84 (38–107) months. The mean ages of the non-surgical group (n=32) and the surgical group (n=27) were 5.9 and 7.1 years, respectively. The causes of fractures were falls from height (n=29), motor vehicle accidents (n=20), child abuse (n=1), and other causes (n=9). Results: The improvement values at the angulation grades were significantly higher in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in both groups (p<0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in foot–thigh angle, foot progression angle, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Fracture localization was not effective on LLD and clinical outcome success, and there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to clinical outcomes. Discussion and Conclusion: The immediate postoperative radiological reduction quality was significantly higher in the surgically treated group than in the non-surgically treated group in the early post-reduction. However, the differences of thigh–foot angles and foot progression angles between the groups were not statistically significant. In addition, there was no difference with regard to LLDs between the groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADIYEKE, L., AYDOĞMUŞ, S., BİLGİN, E., DUYMUŞ, T. M., BOMBACI, H. (2019). Comparison of Angulation Deformity After Remodelling of Pediatric Femoral Fractures. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3, 261–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/186270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hinton RY, Lincoln A, Crockett MM, Sponseller P, Smith G. Fractures of the femoral shaft in children. Incidence, mechanisms, and sociodemographic risk factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:500–9
  2. Bombaci H, Ulkü K, Adiyeke L, Kara S, Görgeç M. Childhood injuries, their etiologies, and preventive measures. [Article in Turkish]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:166–73
  3. Daly KE, Calvert PT. Accidental femoral fracture in infants. Injury 1991;22:337–8. 4. de Moraes FB, da Silva LL, Ferreira FV, Ferro AM, da Rocha VL, Teixeira KI. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES: STUDY OF 200 CASES. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;44:199–203
  4. Wallace ME, Hoffman EB. Remodelling of angular deformity after femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:765–9
  5. Irani RN, Nicholson JT, Chung SM. Long-term results in the treatment of femoral-shaft fractures in young children by immediate spica immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:945–51
  6. Aronson DD, Singer RM, Higgins RF. Skeletal traction for fractures of the femoral shaft in children. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1435–9
  7. Palmu SA, Lohman M, Paukku RT, Peltonen JI, Nietosvaara Y. Childhood femoral fracture can lead to premature knee-joint arthritis. 21-year follow-up results: a retrospective study. Acta Orthop 2013;84:71–5
  8. Keskin D, Ezirmik N, Tatli L. Rotational deformities as the complication of the conservative treatment of children's femoral shaft fractures (apparent cycles and clinical results). [Article in Turkish]. Ulus Travma Derg 2001;7:122–5
  9. Akıncı O, Şekerlisoy A, Kuyurtaş F, Işık T. Results of conservative treatment of femur diaphysis fractures in children. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1996;30,125–7
  10. Lee YH, Lim KB, Gao GX, Mahadev A, Lam KS, Tan SB, et al. Traction and spica casting for closed femoral shaft fractures in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007;15:37–40
  11. Santili C, Akkari M, Waisberg G, de Alcantara T, Abulasan T, Laboissier Barreto S, et al. Bloodless treatment of femoral diaphyseal Ffactures in children. Acta Ortop Bras 2005; 13:249– 52
  12. Stans AA, Morrissy RT, Renwick SE. Femoral shaft fracture treatment in patients age 6 to 16 years. J Pediatr Orthop 1999;19:222–8
  13. Jain A, Aggarwal A, Gulati D, Singh MP. Controversies in orthopaedic trauma--management of fracturesof shaft of femur in children between 6 and 12 years of age. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2014;12:77–84
  14. Rapp M, Kaiser