Does Atraucan cause more postdural puncture backache?

Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Data of 256 pregnant female patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were collected for the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:PDPB seems to be less common with the 26-gauge Quincke needle than with the Atraucan needle.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Postdural puncture backache · spinal anesthesia complications · postspinal backache

Abstract

Background/aim: Postdural puncture backache (PDPB) is the most frequent complaint after spinal anesthesia. In the literature its importance is generally overshadowed by postdural puncture headache. We studied two different kinds of spinal anesthesia needles to compare their technical handling capacities and incidences of PDPB. Materials and methods: Data of 256 pregnant female patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were collected for the study. Patients were divided into two groups as Group A (n = 109) and Group Q (n = 147) according to the spinal needle used for spinal anesthesia (i.e. 26-gauge atraumatic and 26-gauge Quincke needles, respectively). Backache incidences during a 1-week period postoperatively and handling characteristics of the needles were noted. Results: Spinal anesthesia was successfully performed at one attempt in 92.7% and 86.4% of patients in Groups A and Q, respectively. PDPB was encountered in 62.4% and 44.2% of patients in Groups A and Q, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.037). Conclusion: Both 26-gauge Atraucan and Quincke needles have excellent handling characteristics. PDPB seems to be less common with the 26-gauge Quincke needle than with the Atraucan needle.

Özet

Background/aim: Postdural puncture backache (PDPB) is the most frequent complaint after spinal anesthesia. In the literature its importance is generally overshadowed by postdural puncture headache. We studied two different kinds of spinal anesthesia needles to compare their technical handling capacities and incidences of PDPB. Materials and methods: Data of 256 pregnant female patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were collected for the study. Patients were divided into two groups as Group A (n = 109) and Group Q (n = 147) according to the spinal needle used for spinal anesthesia (i.e. 26-gauge atraumatic and 26-gauge Quincke needles, respectively). Backache incidences during a 1-week period postoperatively and handling characteristics of the needles were noted. Results: Spinal anesthesia was successfully performed at one attempt in 92.7% and 86.4% of patients in Groups A and Q, respectively. PDPB was encountered in 62.4% and 44.2% of patients in Groups A and Q, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.037). Conclusion: Both 26-gauge Atraucan and Quincke needles have excellent handling characteristics. PDPB seems to be less common with the 26-gauge Quincke needle than with the Atraucan needle.

Keywords

Postdural puncture backache spinal anesthesia complications postspinal backache cesarean section Atraucan 26 gauge

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDULLAYEV, R., KÜÇÜKEBE, Ö. B., ÇELİK, B., KİRMAN, N., HATİPOĞLU, H. S., HATİPOĞLU, F. A. (2015). Does Atraucan cause more postdural puncture backache?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 877–881. https://ajindex.com/articles/186179

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

Dahl JB, Schultz P, Anker-Moller E, Christensen EF, Staunstrup HG, Carlsson P. Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 178–182.
Tarkkila PJ, Heine H, Tervo RR. Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to post dural puncture headache and backache. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 283–287.
Cotev S, Robin GC, Davidson JT. Back pain after epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 1967; 46: 259–263.
Brattebİ G, Wisborg T, Rodt SA, Rİste I. Is the pencil point spinal needle a better choice in younger patients? A comparison of 24G Sprotte with 27G Quincke needles in an unselected group of general surgical patients below 46 years of age. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 535–538.
Ebinger F, Kosel C, Pietz J, Rating D. Headache and backache after lumbar puncture in children and adolescents: a prospective study. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1588–1592. De Andrés J, Valia JC, Errando C, Rico G, Lopez-Alarcon MD. Subarachnoid anesthesia in young patients: a comparative analysis of two needle bevels. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 547–552.
Pan PH, Fragneto R, Moore C, Ross V. Incidence of postdural puncture headache and backache, and success rate of dural puncture: comparison of two spinal needle designs. South Med J 2004; 97: 359–363.
Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1376– 1383. Casati A, D’Ambrosio A, De Negri P, Fanelli G, Tagariello V, Tarantino F. A clinical comparison between needle-through- needle and double-segment techniques for combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 390– 394. Brattebo G, Wisborg T, Rodt SA, Bjerkan B. Intrathecal anaesthesia in patients under 45 years: Incidence of postdural puncture symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with 27-G needles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 545–548.
Sharma SK, Gambling DR, Joshi GP, Sidawi IE, Herrera ER. Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan® and 25-gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 706–710.
Scott DB, Dittmann M, Clough DGF, Steenberge AV. Atraucan®: A new needle for spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1993; 18: 213– 217. Kokki H, Salonvaara M, Herrgard E, Onen P. Postdural puncture headache is not an age-related symptom in children: a prospective open-randomized, parallel group study comparing a 22-gauge Quincke with a 22