Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Bryophytes of Turkey: An Annotated Reference List of the Species with Synonyms from the Recent Literature and an Annotated List of Turkish Bryological Literature

Pages
95–154
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The references are annotated and provide information on content, especially on the new taxa published in the older literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Based on published records, in Turkey 3 species of Anthocerotopsida, 163 species and intraspecific taxa of Hepaticopsida and 721 species and intraspecific taxa of Bryopsida are recognised.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Including synonyms, in total 1731 names are treated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The references are annotated and provide information on content, especially on the new taxa published in the older literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anthocerotopsida · Bryopsida · check-list

Abstract

Based on published records, in Turkey 3 species of Anthocerotopsida, 163 species and intraspecific taxa of Hepaticopsida and 721 species and intraspecific taxa of Bryopsida are recognised. They are listed in alphabetical order in a reference list to achieve a certain standardisation in the use of names. Including synonyms, in total 1731 names are treated. Critical taxa, doubtful records or taxonomical remarks are briefly discussed in 77 annotations. In addition, an up-to-date list of 219 references (from 1829 to January 2004) on the bryological literature of Turkey is given. The references are annotated and provide information on content, especially on the new taxa published in the older literature.

Özet

Based on published records, in Turkey 3 species of Anthocerotopsida, 163 species and intraspecific taxa of Hepaticopsida and 721 species and intraspecific taxa of Bryopsida are recognised. They are listed in alphabetical order in a reference list to achieve a certain standardisation in the use of names. Including synonyms, in total 1731 names are treated. Critical taxa, doubtful records or taxonomical remarks are briefly discussed in 77 annotations. In addition, an up-to-date list of 219 references (from 1829 to January 2004) on the bryological literature of Turkey is given. The references are annotated and provide information on content, especially on the new taxa published in the older literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜRSCHNER, H. (2005). Bryophytes of Turkey: An Annotated Reference List of the Species with Synonyms from the Recent Literature and an Annotated List of Turkish Bryological Literature. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 95–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/183727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Anderson LE, Crum HA & Buck, WR (1990). List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 448-499. Blockeel TL & Long DG (1998). A check-list and census catalogue of British and Irish bryophytes. Cardiff: British Bryological Society, 208 pp. Blom HH (1998). Schistidium, pp. 287-330. – In: Nyholm E. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses, Fasc
  2. Lund: Nordic Bryological Society. Boisselier-Dubayle MC, Lambourdière J & Bischler H (1998). The leafy liverwort Porella baueri (Porellaceae) is an allopolyploid. Pl. Syst. Evol. 210: 175-197. Brassard GR (1979). The moss genus Timmia
  3. Introduction, and revision of T. norvegica and allied taxa. Lindbergia 5: 39-53. Bruch P, Schimper WP & Gümbel T (1836-1855). Bryologia Europaea seu genera muscorum europaeorum monographice illustrata. Vol. I-VI. Stuttgart (reprint 1971), 1165 S. Bruggeman-Nannenga MA & Pursell RA (1995). Notes on Fissidens V. Lindbergia 20: 49-55. Brummitt RK & Powell CE (1992). Authors of plant names. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 732 pp. Burley JS & Pritchard NM (1990). Revision of the genus Ceratodon (Bryophyta). Harvard Pap. Bot. 2: 17-76. Corley MFV & Crundwell AC (1991). Additions and amendments to the mosses of Europe and the Azores. J. Bryol. 16: 337-356. Corley MFV, Crundwell AC, Düll R, Hill MO & Smith AJE (1981). Mosses of Europe and the Azores – an annotated list of species with synonyms of the recent literature. J. Bryol. 11: 609-689. Crosby MR, Magill RE, Allen BH & He S (1999). A checklist of the mosses. Saint Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, 309 pp. Crum HA (1994). Grimmiales, pp. 386-415. – In: Sharp AJ, Crum H & Eckel P (eds.): The moss flora of Mexico, part 1. New York: Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 63. Dirkse GM & Bouman AC (1995). A revision of Rhynchostegiella (Musci, Brachytheciaceae) in the Canary Islands. Lindbergia 20: 109-121. Dirkse GM, During HJ & Siebel HN (1999). Standaardlijst van de Nederlandse blad-, lever- en hauwmossen. Buxbaumiella 50: 68- 128. Düll R (1994). Deutschlands Moose
  4. Teil. Bad Münstereifel-Ohlerath: IDH Verlag, 211 S. Düll R (1995). Übersicht der Moose Griechenlands. Bryol. Beitr. 10: 1- 125. Düll R & Meinunger L (1989). Deutschlands Moose
  5. Teil. Bad Münstereifel – Ohlerath: IDH Verlag, 368 S. Eddy A (1988). A handbook of Malesian mosses. Vol
  6. London: The Natural History Museum, 277 pp. Engel JJ & Schuster RM (1984). On overview and evaluation of the genera of Geocalycaceae subfamily Lophocoleoideae (Hepaticae). No