Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The Flora of Kalecik Mountain (Şanlıurfa, Turkey)

Pages
155–174
Publication Date
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the life forms, Therophytes come first with a rate of 52.52% in the region, followed by Hemicryptophytes (35.29%), Geophytes (6.72%), Phanerophytes (3.78%), and Chamaephytes (1.68%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out in 2002 and 2003 in order to determine the flora of Kalecik Mountain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research area is situated in Şanlıurfa province and within C7 of the grid system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the life forms, Therophytes come first with a rate of 52.52% in the region, followed by Hemicryptophytes (35.29%), Geophytes (6.72%), Phanerophytes (3.78%), and Chamaephytes (1.68%).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Flora · Kalecik Mountain · Şanlıurfa

Abstract

This research was carried out in 2002 and 2003 in order to determine the flora of Kalecik Mountain. The research area is situated in Şanlıurfa province and within C7 of the grid system. In the area, 238 taxa belonging to 39 families, and 140 genera, were determined. Of all the collected specimens, 28 taxa are new records for C7, and 13 (5.46%) taxa are endemic for Turkey. In the distribution of the species according to floristic regions, Irano-Turanian elements ranked first with a rate of 39.07%, followed by Mediterranean elements with a rate of 8.40% and Euro-Siberian elements with a rate of 1.68%. Some 19.75% of the determined species were widespread while 31.93% of the taxa are of unknown phytogeographic region. The families with the most taxa in the research area are Fabaceae (56), Asteraceae (25), Lamiaceae (19), Brassicaceae (14), Apiaceae (14) and Poaceae (13). Concerning the number of species, the richest genera in this region are as follows: Astragalus L. (11), Vicia L. (10), Trifolium L. (8), Trigonella L. (6), Medicago L. (6) and Salvia L. (5). According to the life forms, Therophytes come first with a rate of 52.52% in the region, followed by Hemicryptophytes (35.29%), Geophytes (6.72%), Phanerophytes (3.78%), and Chamaephytes (1.68%).

Özet

This research was carried out in 2002 and 2003 in order to determine the flora of Kalecik Mountain. The research area is situated in Şanlıurfa province and within C7 of the grid system. In the area, 238 taxa belonging to 39 families, and 140 genera, were determined. Of all the collected specimens, 28 taxa are new records for C7, and 13 (5.46%) taxa are endemic for Turkey. In the distribution of the species according to floristic regions, Irano-Turanian elements ranked first with a rate of 39.07%, followed by Mediterranean elements with a rate of 8.40% and Euro-Siberian elements with a rate of 1.68%. Some 19.75% of the determined species were widespread while 31.93% of the taxa are of unknown phytogeographic region. The families with the most taxa in the research area are Fabaceae (56), Asteraceae (25), Lamiaceae (19), Brassicaceae (14), Apiaceae (14) and Poaceae (13). Concerning the number of species, the richest genera in this region are as follows: Astragalus L. (11), Vicia L. (10), Trifolium L. (8), Trigonella L. (6), Medicago L. (6) and Salvia L. (5). According to the life forms, Therophytes come first with a rate of 52.52% in the region, followed by Hemicryptophytes (35.29%), Geophytes (6.72%), Phanerophytes (3.78%), and Chamaephytes (1.68%).

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞDU, M., AKAN, H. (2005). The Flora of Kalecik Mountain (Şanlıurfa, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 155–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/183714

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adıgüzel N & Aytaç Z (2001). Flora of Ceylanpınar State Farm (fianlıurfa-Turkey). Fl Medit, 11: 333-361. Akan H & Eker İ (2004). Some Morphological and Anatomical Investigations on Autumn Species of Crocus L. Occurring in fianlıurfa. Turk J Bot 28: 185-191.
  2. Akman Y (1990). İklim ve Biyoiklim. Ankara: Palme Yayınları. Mühendislik serisi:103. Aslan M & Türkmen N (2001). New Floristic Records for C7 grid square. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 8 (2): 69-73. Aslan M & Türkmen N (2003). New Floristic Records for squares C6 and C7 from Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 10 (2): 163- 168. Baytop A (2003). Türkiye’de Botanik Tarihi Arafltırmaları. İstanbul:
  3. Çetin matbaacılık. Çırpıcı A (1987). Türkiye’nin flora ve Vejetasyonu Üzerindeki Çalıflmalar. Doğa TU Bot Derg 11 (2): 217-232.
  4. Davis PH (1975). Turkey: Present State of Floristic Knowledge. Coll Int C N R S 235: 93-113 Davis PH (ed.) (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. vol. 1-9. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  5. Davis PH, Mill RR & Tan K (eds) (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement) vol. 10. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  6. Donner J (1990). Verbreitungskarten zu P.H. Davis Flora of Turkey, 1- 10. Linzer Biol Beitr 22 (2): 381-515. Ekim T & Güner A (1986). The Anatolian Diagonal: Fact or Fiction? Proceedings of Royal Society of Edinburgh 89B: 69-77.
  7. Ekim T, Koyuncu M, Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z & Adıgüzel N (2000). Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı (Red Data Book of Turkish Plants). Ankara: Türkiye Tabiatını Koruma Derneği. Ertekin AS & Saya Ö (1997). New Floristic Records for The Various Grid Squares From The Fabaceae. Tr J of Botany 21: 187-189.
  8. Ertekin AS (2002). Karacadağ Bitki Çeflitliliği. Ankara: Sürdürülebilir Kırsal ve Kentsel Kalkınma Derneği. Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T & Bafler KHC (2000). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (supplement 2) vol. 11. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press. IUCN Species Survival Commission (2001). IUCN Red List categories and Criteria. Approved by the 51 st meeting of the IUCN Council, Version 3.1 Switzerland: Gland. Kaynak G & Ketenoğlu O (1980). New Fern Specimens In South East Anatolian Region. İst Üniv Fen Fak Mec Seri B, 45: 199-202.
  9. Kaynak G (1986). New Floristic Records From Urfa and Diyarbakır Provinces, SE Turkey. Willdenowia 16: 79-86.
  10. Kaynak G (1987). Türkiye Florasındaki Bazı Kareler İçin Yeni Kayıtlar. Doğa TU Bot Derg 11 (2): 118-123. Kaynak G (1989a). Contribution to the Flora of Karacadağ (U