Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Morphological and genetic variation within and among four Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations

Pages
619–629
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Numeric-taxonomical and molecular techniques [nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSRs), expressed sequence tag (EST) SSRs, and chloroplast SSRs] were used to estimate morphological and genetic differentiation within and among 4 Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 3 out of 15 studied leaf morphological characters (clustered hairs, number of intercalary veins, petiole length) mainly accounted for the discrimination between species.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Quercus · expressed sequence tag · simple sequence repeats

Abstract

Numeric-taxonomical and molecular techniques [nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSRs), expressed sequence tag (EST) SSRs, and chloroplast SSRs] were used to estimate morphological and genetic differentiation within and among 4 Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations in Turkey. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 3 out of 15 studied leaf morphological characters (clustered hairs, number of intercalary veins, petiole length) mainly accounted for the discrimination between species. In accordance with earlier observations, the mean genetic differentiation between Q. petraea and Q. robur at 8 microsatellite loci (FST = 0.030) and at chloroplast microsatellites (GST = 0.22) was low, potentially as the result of interspecific gene flow or shared ancestral polymorphisms. Chloroplast microsatellite analyses showed unique chloroplast haplotypes in Turkey, suggesting a glacial refuge in this region. Nuclear microsatellite ssrQrZAG96, described in other studies as being potentially under directional selection (outlier locus) due to high interspecific differentiation, showed considerably lower differentiation between species in the present study (FST = 0.028). These different patterns of genetic variation suggest different local adaptations of the species in this putative glacial refugial area in Turkey. It may also be that this marker is not directly associated with morphological or adaptive species differences. Interestingly, the analysed Q. petraea and Q. robur populations appear to have ecological requirements with regard to water availability that are different than those described for European populations. The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.

Özet

Numeric-taxonomical and molecular techniques [nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSRs), expressed sequence tag (EST) SSRs, and chloroplast SSRs] were used to estimate morphological and genetic differentiation within and among 4 Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations in Turkey. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 3 out of 15 studied leaf morphological characters (clustered hairs, number of intercalary veins, petiole length) mainly accounted for the discrimination between species. In accordance with earlier observations, the mean genetic differentiation between Q. petraea and Q. robur at 8 microsatellite loci (FST = 0.030) and at chloroplast microsatellites (GST = 0.22) was low, potentially as the result of interspecific gene flow or shared ancestral polymorphisms. Chloroplast microsatellite analyses showed unique chloroplast haplotypes in Turkey, suggesting a glacial refuge in this region. Nuclear microsatellite ssrQrZAG96, described in other studies as being potentially under directional selection (outlier locus) due to high interspecific differentiation, showed considerably lower differentiation between species in the present study (FST = 0.028). These different patterns of genetic variation suggest different local adaptations of the species in this putative glacial refugial area in Turkey. It may also be that this marker is not directly associated with morphological or adaptive species differences. Interestingly, the analysed Q. petraea and Q. robur populations appear to have ecological requirements with regard to water availability that are different than those described for European populations. The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEDAĞ, C., GAILING, O. (2013). Morphological and genetic variation within and among four Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 619–629. https://ajindex.com/articles/183427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aas G (1993). Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy. Annals of Forest Science 50: 107–114.
  2. Aas G (1998). Morphologische und Ökologische Variation Mitteleuropäischer Quercus-Arten: ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Biodiversität. Eching bei München, Germany: IHW-Verlag. Aldrich PR & Cavender-Bares J (2011). Quercus. In: Kole C (ed.) Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources Forest Trees, pp. 89–129.
  3. Springer. Alexandersson E, Danielson JA, Råde J, Moparthi VK, Fontes M, Kjellbom P & Johanson U (2010). Transcriptional regulation of aquaporins in accessions of Arabidopsis in response to drought stress. Plant Journal 61: 650–660.
  4. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A & Kremer A (1995). Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France. Silvae Genetica 44: 1–10.
  5. Bakker EG, Van Dam BC, Van Eck HJ & Jacobsen E (2001). A discrimination between Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. based on species-indicative AFLP markers. Forest Genetics 8: 315–322.
  6. Bodenes C, Joandet S, Laigret F & Kremer A (1997). Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Heredity 78: 433–444. Borazan A & Babaç MT (2003). Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 40: 233–242.
  7. Borovics A (1999). Separability of pedunculate oak and sessile oak aggregate: a contribution to the hybrid and small species estimation. Proceedings of the Forest Research Institute 89: 93–110.
  8. Breda N, Cochard H, Dreyer E & Granier A (1993). Field comparison of transpiration, stomatal conductance and vulnerability to cavitation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur under water-stress. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 571–582.
  9. Coart E, Lamote V & De Loose M (2002). AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 431–439.
  10. Curtu AL, Gailing O & Finkeldey R (2007a). Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 218. Curtu AL, Gailing O, Leinemann L & Finkeldey R (2007b). Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp