Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

A taxonomic revision of Salvia euphratica sensu lato and its closely related species (sect. Hymenosphace, Lamiaceae) using multivariate analysis

Pages
261–276
Publication Date
2010-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, their amended and expanded descriptions, distributions, phenology, ecology, and photographs are provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As an initial part of a revisional study based on the genus Salvia L. (Lamiaceae), extensive field studies, herbarium and literature surveys, and multivariate analysis have been conducted on the basis of the Salvia euphratica sensu lato (S. cerino-pruinosa, S. euphratica, S. leiocalycina, and S. pseudeuphratica) and its closely related species (S. kronenburgii and S. sericeo-tomentosa) in order to understand their taxonomic status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the multivariate analysis, 35 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) representing 24 populations of the species were investigated and scored on the basis of 25 character states by means of MVSP software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, their amended and expanded descriptions, distributions, phenology, ecology, and photographs are provided.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Lamiaceae · Salvia euphratica · taxonomy

Abstract

As an initial part of a revisional study based on the genus Salvia L. (Lamiaceae), extensive field studies, herbarium and literature surveys, and multivariate analysis have been conducted on the basis of the Salvia euphratica sensu lato (S. cerino-pruinosa, S. euphratica, S. leiocalycina, and S. pseudeuphratica) and its closely related species (S. kronenburgii and S. sericeo-tomentosa) in order to understand their taxonomic status. For the multivariate analysis, 35 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) representing 24 populations of the species were investigated and scored on the basis of 25 character states by means of MVSP software. Principle coordinate analysis (PCO) utilizing the Gower coefficient on standardized data was conducted on the specimens to see their distribution as 3-dimensional plots. In the Flora of Turkey, S. euphratica, S. kronenburgii, and S. sericeo-tomentosa were evaluated as separate species. On the other hand, S. cerino-pruinosa and S. pseudeuphratica were regarded as synonyms of S. euphratica. As a result of the present study, S. cerino-pruinosa and S. pseudeuphratica are accepted as distinct species. Turkish endemic S. cerino-pruinosa and its closest relative Iranian endemic S. kermanshahensis are also discussed in terms of their morphological and taxonomical relationships. Literature surveys and herbarium studies indicated that S. pseudeuphratica has been rediscovered once again since it was first collected 117 years ago. A diagnostic key for the species studied is given and their diagnostic morphological characters are discussed. Moreover, their amended and expanded descriptions, distributions, phenology, ecology, and photographs are provided.

Özet

As an initial part of a revisional study based on the genus Salvia L. (Lamiaceae), extensive field studies, herbarium and literature surveys, and multivariate analysis have been conducted on the basis of the Salvia euphratica sensu lato (S. cerino-pruinosa, S. euphratica, S. leiocalycina, and S. pseudeuphratica) and its closely related species (S. kronenburgii and S. sericeo-tomentosa) in order to understand their taxonomic status. For the multivariate analysis, 35 OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) representing 24 populations of the species were investigated and scored on the basis of 25 character states by means of MVSP software. Principle coordinate analysis (PCO) utilizing the Gower coefficient on standardized data was conducted on the specimens to see their distribution as 3-dimensional plots. In the Flora of Turkey, S. euphratica, S. kronenburgii, and S. sericeo-tomentosa were evaluated as separate species. On the other hand, S. cerino-pruinosa and S. pseudeuphratica were regarded as synonyms of S. euphratica. As a result of the present study, S. cerino-pruinosa and S. pseudeuphratica are accepted as distinct species. Turkish endemic S. cerino-pruinosa and its closest relative Iranian endemic S. kermanshahensis are also discussed in terms of their morphological and taxonomical relationships. Literature surveys and herbarium studies indicated that S. pseudeuphratica has been rediscovered once again since it was first collected 117 years ago. A diagnostic key for the species studied is given and their diagnostic morphological characters are discussed. Moreover, their amended and expanded descriptions, distributions, phenology, ecology, and photographs are provided.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, A., CELEP, F., DOĞAN, M., BAGHERPOUR, S. (2010). A taxonomic revision of Salvia euphratica sensu lato and its closely related species (sect. Hymenosphace, Lamiaceae) using multivariate analysis. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 261–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/183357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Boisseir EP (1879). Flora Orientalis, Vol. 4. Geneva. Celep F, Doğan M, Bagherpour S & Kahraman A (2009a). A new variety of Salvia sericeotomentosa (Lamiaceae) srom South Anatolia, Turkey. Novon 19: 432-436.
  2. Celep F, Doğan M & Duran A (2009b). A new record for the Flora of Turkey: Salvia viscosa Jacq. (Labiatae). Turk J Bot 33: 57-60. Celep F & Doğan M (2010). Salvia ekimiana (Lamiaceae), a new species from Turkey. Ann Bot Fenn 47: 63-66.
  3. Celep F, Kahraman A & Doğan M (2010). A new taxon of the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) from Turkey. Pl Ecol Evol (in press). Gower JC (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857-871.
  4. Hedge IC (1965). Studies in the Flora of Afghanistan III: an account of Salvia. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 26(4): 408. Hedge IC (1982a). Salvia L. In: Davis PH (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, 7: 400-461. Edinburgh; Edinburgh Univ. Press. Hedge IC (1982b). Salvia L. In: Rechinger KH (ed.), Flora Iranica 150: 403-476,
  5. Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz. İlçim A, Celep F & Doğan M (2009). Salvia marashica (Lamiaceae), a new pinnatisect-leaved species from Turkey. Ann Bot Fenn 46 (1): 75-79.
  6. Kahraman A, Celep F & Doğan M (2009a). A new record for the Flora of Turkey: Salvia macrosiphon Boiss. (Labiatae). Turk J Bot 33: 53-55.
  7. Kahraman A, Celep F & Doğan M (2009b). Comparative morphology, anatomy and palynology of two Salvia L. species (Lamiaceae). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy 16(1): 73-82.
  8. Kahraman A, Celep F & Doğan M (2009c). Morphology, anatomy and palynology of Salvia indica L. (Labiatae). World Applied Sciences Journal 6(2): 289-296.
  9. Kahraman A, Doğan M, Celep F, Akaydın G & Koyuncu M (2010a). Morphology, anatomy, palynology and nutlet micromorphology of the rediscovered Turkish endemic Salvia ballsiana (Lamiaceae) and their taxonomic implications. Nord J Bot 28: 91-99.
  10. Kahraman A, Celep F & Doğan M (2010b). Anatomy, trichome morphology and palynology of Salvia chrysophylla Stapf (Lamiaceae). S Afr J Bot 76: 187-195.
  11. Kovach WL (1999). MVSP, a multivariate statistical package for Windows, Version 3.1. Pentraeth, Wales: Kovach Computing Services. Radford AE (1986). Fundamentals of plant systematics. p. 497-498,
  12. Harper and Row, New York. Rechinger KH (1952). Labiatae Novae Orientalis. Öst. Bot. Zeitschr 99: 48-52.
  13. Romesburg HC (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Lifetime learning 315 publications, pp. 333-334,
  14. Lulu press, Belmont. Ropert D (ed