Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Nickel hyperaccumulation by natural plants in Turkish serpentine soils

Pages
269–280
Publication Date
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bottlenecks and drawbacks of phytoremediation techniques for commercial use were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Natural plants in Turkish serpentine soils were surveyed to determine their Ni accumulation capability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aboveground parts of 413 herbaceous plants and the surface soil (0-15 cm) of 192 serpentine samples were collected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bottlenecks and drawbacks of phytoremediation techniques for commercial use were discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: DTPA-extractable Ni · Brassicaceae · serpentine soils

Abstract

Natural plants in Turkish serpentine soils were surveyed to determine their Ni accumulation capability. Geographic distribution and diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable nickel contents of the western Anatolian serpentine soils and their vegetative contents were studied to find the possible relationships between the phytoavailable Ni amount in the soil and the Ni content of potential accumulator plants. Over half of the surface area of Turkey was targeted in the study. Aboveground parts of 413 herbaceous plants and the surface soil (0-15 cm) of 192 serpentine samples were collected. A digital elevation model and ANUSPLIN and ArcGIS 8.1 software packages were employed for generation of climatic surfaces and analysis in preparation of comparative maps. Scientifically approved Ni hyperaccumulator plant taxa as well as readily emerging species were tested under greenhouse and climate chamber conditions. The varying magnitude of nickel determined in the aboveground parts of the test plants indicated that the resistance or vulnerability and Ni requirements of a plant species were species-specific and were more effective than the Ni amount in the soil on the uptake of the element. Significant differences were found between the amount of DTPA-extractable Ni in the soil and the Ni content of hyperaccumulator Brassicaceae plants grown in the same soil bodies. Isatis pinnatiloba, which is endemic to Turkey, was introduced as a nickel hyperaccumulator species. Bottlenecks and drawbacks of phytoremediation techniques for commercial use were discussed.

Özet

Natural plants in Turkish serpentine soils were surveyed to determine their Ni accumulation capability. Geographic distribution and diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable nickel contents of the western Anatolian serpentine soils and their vegetative contents were studied to find the possible relationships between the phytoavailable Ni amount in the soil and the Ni content of potential accumulator plants. Over half of the surface area of Turkey was targeted in the study. Aboveground parts of 413 herbaceous plants and the surface soil (0-15 cm) of 192 serpentine samples were collected. A digital elevation model and ANUSPLIN and ArcGIS 8.1 software packages were employed for generation of climatic surfaces and analysis in preparation of comparative maps. Scientifically approved Ni hyperaccumulator plant taxa as well as readily emerging species were tested under greenhouse and climate chamber conditions. The varying magnitude of nickel determined in the aboveground parts of the test plants indicated that the resistance or vulnerability and Ni requirements of a plant species were species-specific and were more effective than the Ni amount in the soil on the uptake of the element. Significant differences were found between the amount of DTPA-extractable Ni in the soil and the Ni content of hyperaccumulator Brassicaceae plants grown in the same soil bodies. Isatis pinnatiloba, which is endemic to Turkey, was introduced as a nickel hyperaccumulator species. Bottlenecks and drawbacks of phytoremediation techniques for commercial use were discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINÖZLÜ, H., KARAGÖZ, A., POLAT, T., ÜNVER, İ. (2012). Nickel hyperaccumulation by natural plants in Turkish serpentine soils. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 269–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/183350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J & Bolan NS (2004). Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 122: 121-142. Baker AJM & Brooks RR (1989). Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements - a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1: 81- 126. Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Reeves RD & Smith JAC (2000). Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biochemical resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Terry N, Banuelos GS (eds.) Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water, pp. 85-107.
  2. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. Baker AJM & Proctor J (1990). Th e infl uence of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc on the distribution and evolution of metallophytes in the British Isles. Plant Systematics and Evolution Evol 173: 91-108. Baker AJM & Whiting SN (2002). In search of the Holy Grail - a further step in understanding metal hyperaccumulation? New Phytologist 155: 1-4.
  3. Boyd RS, Jaff ré T & Odom JW (1999). Variation in nickel content in the nickel-hyperaccumulating shrub Psychotria douarrei (Rubiaceae) from New Caledonia. Biotropica 31: 403-410.
  4. Branquinho C, Serrano HC, Pinto MJ & Martins-Loução MA (2007). Revisiting the plant hyperaccumulation criteria to rare plants and earth abundant elements. Environmental Pollution 146: 437-443.
  5. Brooks RR, Morrison RS, Reeves RD, Dudley TR & Akman Y (1979). Hyperaccumulation of nickel by Alyssum linnaeus (Cruciferae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 203: 387- 403. Chaney RL (1983). Plant uptake of inorganic waste constitutes In: Parr JF, Marsh PB & Kla JM (eds.) Land Treatment of Hazardous Wastes, pp. 50-76.
  6. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation. Davis PH (ed.) (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vols. 1-9. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Davis PH & Heywood VH (1973). Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. New York: Robert E. Kieger Publishing Co. Davis PH, Mill RR & Tan K (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 1), Vol. 10. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  7. Ghaderian SM, Mohtadi A, Rahiminejad MR & Baker AJM (2007). Nickel and other metal uptake and accumulation by species of Alyssum (Brassicaceae) from the ultramafi cs of Iran. Environ Pollut 145: 293-298.
  8. Golightly JP (1981). Nickeliferous laterite deposits. Econ Geol 75: 710-735.
  9. Haq AU, Bates TE & Soon YK (1980). Comparison of extractants for plant-available zinc, cadmium, nicke