Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Identification of stable sources for surrogate traits in Arachis glabrata and marker-trait association for tolerance to water deficit stress

Pages
309–324
Publication Date
2014-05-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Eight random amplified polymorphic DNA markers were identified with significant association to SCMR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Diploid and tetraploid wild relatives of cultivated peanut are genetically diverse, providing rich sources of genetic resources for tapping resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Arachis glabrata Benth. is a tetraploid (2n = 40) rhizomatous species that is reported to be tolerant to water deficit stress.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Eight random amplified polymorphic DNA markers were identified with significant association to SCMR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Arachis · analysis of molecular variance · association

Abstract

Diploid and tetraploid wild relatives of cultivated peanut are genetically diverse, providing rich sources of genetic resources for tapping resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Arachis glabrata Benth. is a tetraploid (2n = 40) rhizomatous species that is reported to be tolerant to water deficit stress. Identification of A. glabrata accessions with high SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) and low specific leaf area (SLA) values would be an option for improving water deficit stress tolerance in peanut. An investigation was undertaken to study the genetic diversity of A. glabrata accessions using molecular markers as well as surrogate traits (SLA and SCMR) for water deficit stress to identify stable sources for SCMR and to identify DNA markers linked to SCMR. SCMR showed high heritability and genetic advance as percent of mean (GAM) and a negative relation with SLA in A. glabrata. High heritability and high GAM indicates additive gene action. A high level of genetic diversity was observed in A. glabrata accessions, indicating that these populations had not experienced major genetic bottlenecks or genetic drift. Eight random amplified polymorphic DNA markers were identified with significant association to SCMR.

Özet

Diploid and tetraploid wild relatives of cultivated peanut are genetically diverse, providing rich sources of genetic resources for tapping resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Arachis glabrata Benth. is a tetraploid (2n = 40) rhizomatous species that is reported to be tolerant to water deficit stress. Identification of A. glabrata accessions with high SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) and low specific leaf area (SLA) values would be an option for improving water deficit stress tolerance in peanut. An investigation was undertaken to study the genetic diversity of A. glabrata accessions using molecular markers as well as surrogate traits (SLA and SCMR) for water deficit stress to identify stable sources for SCMR and to identify DNA markers linked to SCMR. SCMR showed high heritability and genetic advance as percent of mean (GAM) and a negative relation with SLA in A. glabrata. High heritability and high GAM indicates additive gene action. A high level of genetic diversity was observed in A. glabrata accessions, indicating that these populations had not experienced major genetic bottlenecks or genetic drift. Eight random amplified polymorphic DNA markers were identified with significant association to SCMR.

🔖

Cite This Article

BERA, S. K., CHANDRASHEKAR, A. B., PATEL, S., SOJITRA, V. K., MAURYA, A. (2014). Identification of stable sources for surrogate traits in Arachis glabrata and marker-trait association for tolerance to water deficit stress. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 309–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/183191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Babitha M, Vasantha RP, Reddy PV (2006). Genetic studies on leaf chlorophyll content in groundnut, A. hypogaea L. in terms of SPAD chlorophyll meter reading. J Oilseeds Res 23: 247–251.
  2. Bindu Madhava H, Sheshshayee MS, Shankar AG, Prasad TG, Udayakumar M (2003). Use of SPAD chlorophyll meter to assess transpiration efficiency of peanut. In: Cruickshank AW, Rachaputi NC, Wright GC, Nigam SN, editors. Breeding of Drought Resistant Peanuts. ACIAR Proceedings No. 112. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, pp. 3–9.
  3. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2003). Morphological and molecular diversity among Italian populations of Quercus petraea (Fagaceae). Ann Bot 91: 707– 7 Burow MD, Simpson CE, Paterson AH, Starr JL (1996). Identification of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) RAPD markers diagnostic of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne arenaria (Neal) Chitwood) resistance. Mol Breeding 2: 369–379.
  4. Burow MD, Simpson CE, Starr JL, Paterson AH (2001). Transmission genetics of chromatin from a synthetic amphidiploid to cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): broadening the gene pool of a monophyletic polyploid species. Genetics 159: 823– 8 Burow MD, Starr JL, Park CH, Simpson CE, Paterson AH (2008). Identification of QTLs for resistance to early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori) in an introgression population of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Proceedings of the 16th Plant and Animal Genome Conference, 12–16
  5. January, San Diego, CA, USA. Chunilal, Hariprasanna K, Rathnakumar AL, Samdur MY, Gor HK, Chikani BM (2006). High yielding water-use efficient Spanish groundnut genotypes for rainfed production system. Indian J Agri Sci 76: 148–150.
  6. Coffelt TA (1989). Peanut. In: Robbelen G, Downey RK, Ashri A, editors. Oil Crops of the World - Their Breeding and Utilization. New York NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, pp. 319–338.
  7. Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK (2005). An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142: 169–196.
  8. Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963). Genotype × environment interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF, editors. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of sciences, pp 164–196.
  9. Cooke RJ (1995). Gel electrophoresis for the identification of plant varieties. J Chromatogr 698: 281–291.
  10. Cuc LM, Mace ES, Crouch JH, Quang VD, Long TD, Varshney RK (2008). Isolation and cha