Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Phenotypic plasticity and specialization along an altitudinal gradient in Trifolium repens

Pages
440–447
Publication Date
2018-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results suggest that specialization may limit the responses of plants to future environmental changes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Phenotypic plasticity and specialization represent seemingly contrasting strategies to heterogeneous environments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We found that both low and high altitude populations experienced a loss in performance in competition treatments and did not express a shade avoidance response under competition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results suggest that specialization may limit the responses of plants to future environmental changes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Phenotypic plasticity · specialization · altitude

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity and specialization represent seemingly contrasting strategies to heterogeneous environments. Specialization is associated with the loss of phenotypic plasticity, particularly in functional traits. However, it is equivocal if this loss of plasticity is observed only in the specific habitat and stress type where the specialization occurs or a general loss of plasticity is seen across habitats. We examined populations of Trifolium repens L. following an expansion during the colonization of Australia from relatively good low altitude habitats to more stressful high altitude habitats in the Blue Mountains region, New South Wales, Australia. We examined if specialization to abiotic stress causes a loss of adaptive plasticity in functional traits under competition treatments (a different type of stress rather than abiotic stress). We found that both low and high altitude populations experienced a loss in performance in competition treatments and did not express a shade avoidance response under competition. Specialization to higher abiotic stress was associated with the loss of adaptive plasticity in functional traits. Our results suggest that specialization may limit the responses of plants to future environmental changes.

🔖

Cite This Article

FAZLIOĞLU, F., WAN, J. S., BONSER, S. P. (2018). Phenotypic plasticity and specialization along an altitudinal gradient in Trifolium repens. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 440–447. https://ajindex.com/articles/183050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Balaguer L, Martinez-Ferri E, Valladares F, Pérez-Corona ME, Baquedano FJ, Castillo FJ, Manrique E (2001). Population divergence in the plasticity of the response of to the light environment Quercus coccifera. Funct Ecol 15: 124-135.
  2. Barros FDV, Goulart MF, Telles SBS, Lovato MB, Valladares F, de Lemos-Filho JP (2011). Phenotypic plasticity to light of two congeneric trees from contrasting habitats: Brazilian Atlantic forest versus cerrado (savanna). Plant Biol 14: 208-215.
  3. Bonser SP (2013). High reproductive efficiency as an adaptive strategy in competitive environments. Funct Ecol 27: 876-885.
  4. Botto JF (2015). Plasticity to simulated shade is associated with altitude in structured populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 38:1321-1332.
  5. Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V (2011). Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 9: 222-228.
  6. Elzinga JA, Atlan A, Biere A, Gigord L, Weis AE, Bernasconi G (2007). Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 432-439.
  7. Fazlioglu F, Al-Namazi A, Bonser SP (2016). Reproductive efficiency and plasticity of different plant forms under simulated competition. Ecol Evol 6: 4947-4957.
  8. Fazlioglu F, Bonser SP (2016). Phenotypic plasticity and specialization in clonal versus non-clonal plants: a data synthesis. Acta Oecol 77: 193-200.
  9. Fazlioglu F, Wan JSH, Bonser SP (2017). Testing specialization hypothesis among a stress gradient. Austral Ecol 42: 40-47.
  10. Frankow-Lindberg BE (2001). Adaptation to winter stress in nine white clover populations: changes in non-structural carbohydrates during exposure to simulated winter conditions and ‘spring’ regrowth potential. Ann Bot-London 88: 745-751.
  11. Gibbin EM, Massamba N’Siala G, Chakravarti LJ, Jarrold MD, Calosi P (2017). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity under global change. Sci Rep-UK 7: 17253. Gratani L (2014). Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in Botany 2014: 1-17.
  12. Griffith T, Sultan SE (2012). Field-based insights to the evolution of specialization: plasticity and fitness across habitats in a specialist/generalist species pair. Ecol Evol 2: 778-791.
  13. Grime JP (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetative Processes. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Huber H, Chen X, Hendriks M, Keijsers D, Voesenek LA, Pierik R, Poorter H, de Kroon H, Visser EJ (2012). Plasticity as a plastic response: How submergence-induced leaf elongation in Rumex palust