Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Structural characterization of ITS2 and CBC species concept applications in the tribe Coluteocarpeae Brassicaceae

Pages
295–308
Publication Date
2020-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A phylogenetic tree based on the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact that Noccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The taxonomic utility of internal transcribed spacer 2 ITS2 secondary structures in different plant groups, as well as in Brassicaceae, has been addressed by many studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although characterization and applications of ITS2 secondary structures for the members of main Brassicaceae lineages Lineages I, II, III, and expanded Lineage II have been studied, the utility of compensatory base change CBC species concept has not been the subject of any studies thus far.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A phylogenetic tree based on the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact that Noccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:49 specimens
⚙️Variables:Coluteocarpeae · Brassicaceae · Noccaea

Abstract

The taxonomic utility of internal transcribed spacer 2 ITS2 secondary structures in different plant groups, as well as in Brassicaceae, has been addressed by many studies. Although characterization and applications of ITS2 secondary structures for the members of main Brassicaceae lineages Lineages I, II, III, and expanded Lineage II have been studied, the utility of compensatory base change CBC species concept has not been the subject of any studies thus far. In the current study, the ITS2 secondary structures of 49 Coluteocarpeae expanded Lineage II specimens were investigated to determine relationships among the species. In addition to the utility of the CBC species concept, the availability of hemi-CBC and nonstructural substitutions NSTs , which are also used for generic and species delimitation, were tested and discussed. A maximum likelihood tree, based on the sequence-structural alignment of the 49 specimens, was constructed to test the different generic assumptions reported by different researchers in the literature. The structural analysis showed that the ITS2 secondary structures of all of the Coluteocarpeae members exhibited a 4-fingered hand model, which was common in the majority of the family members. No CBCs were observed, whereas hemi-CBCs and NSTs were common among the tribe members. Although hemi-CBCs and NSTs were useful for distinguishing most of the Coluteocarpeae species Noccaea aptera Velen. F.K. Mey., Noccaea aghrica P.H. Davis & Kit Tan M. Fırat & Özüdoğru, Noccaea fendleri A.Gray Holub subsp. glauca A. Nelson Al-Shehbaz & M. Koch, Noccaea griffithiana Boiss. F.K. Mey., Noccaea rubescens Schott & Kotschy ex Boiss. F.K. Mey., etc. , they were not effective for delimitating some problematic species, such as members of Thlaspiceras F.K. Mey. A phylogenetic tree based on the sequence-structural dataset of the ITS2 showed that generic delimitation of Al-Shehbaz was more acceptable due to the fact that Noccaea sensu Al-Shehbaz is monophyletic.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGİŞİ, K. (2020). Structural characterization of ITS2 and CBC species concept applications in the tribe Coluteocarpeae Brassicaceae. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 295–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/182725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ali T, Schmuker A, Runge F, Solovyeva I, Nigrelli L et al. (2016a). Morphology, phylogeny, and taxonomy of Microthlaspi (Brassicaceae: Coluteocarpeae) and related genera. Taxon 65 (1): 79-98. doi: 10.12705/651.6 Ali T, Runge F, Dutbayev A, Schmuker A, Solovyeva I et al. (2016b). Microthlaspi erraticum (Jord.) T. Ali et Thines has a wide distribution, ranging from the Alps to the Tien Shan. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 225: 76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.09.008 Al-Shehbaz, IA (2014). A synopsis of the genus Noccaea (Coluteocarpeae, Brassicaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany: 19(1): 25-51. doi:10.3100/hpib.v19iss1.2014.n3 Al-Shehbaz IA (2012). A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae). Taxon 61 (5): 931-954. doi: 10.1002/ tax.615002 Al-Shehbaz IA, Beilstein MA, Kellogg EA (2006). Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Systematics and Evolution 259 (2-4): 89-120. doi: 10.1007/ s00606-006-0415-z Ankenbrand MJ, Keller A, Wolf M, Schultz J, Förster F (2015). ITS2 database V: Twice as much. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32 (11): 3030-3032. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv174 Artelari R (2002). Thlaspi. In: Strid A, Tan K (editors). Flora Helenica. Vol. 2. Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag, pp. 253-261.
  2. Aytaç Z, Nordt B, Parolly G (2006). A new species of Noccaea (Brassicaceae) from South Anatolia, Turkey. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 150(3): 409-416.
  3. Bowman JL, Brüggemann H, Lee JY, Mummenhoff K. (1999). Evolutionary changes in floral structure within Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 160 (5): 917-929. doi: 10.1086/314194 Budak M, Güler M, Korkmaz EM, Örgen SH, Başıbüyük HH (2016). The characterization and taxonomic utility of ITS2 in Tenthredopsis Costa, 1859 (Tenthredinidae: Hymenoptera) with some new records from Turkey. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 66: 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.03.008 Coleman AW, Vacquier VD (2002). Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for abalone (Haliotis). Journal of Molecular Evolution 54 (2): 246-257. doi: 10.1007/s00239-001-0006-0
  4. Coleman AW (2003). ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends in Genetics 19 (7): 370-375. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525 (03)00118-5
  5. Coleman AW (2009). Is there a molecular key to the level of “biological species” in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50 (1): 197-203. doi: 10.1