Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS OF GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN SOYBEAN GROWN AS A SECOND CROP

Pages
145–154
Publication Date
2019-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to GGE Biplot analysis for all traits and genotypes, G4 (BATEM 317) had the largest values for plant height, first pod height, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity and seed yield.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study was aimed to evaluate the adaptability and stability of the soybean genotypes based on the seed yield and the other observed characteristics in the sites cultivated second crop soybean of Turkey which have Mediterranean climate conditions using the GGE biplot analysis method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiments were performed under irrigated conditions in 2014, 2015 and 2016 in four different locations (Adana, Antalya, Izmir and Sanliurfa) of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to GGE Biplot analysis for all traits and genotypes, G4 (BATEM 317) had the largest values for plant height, first pod height, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity and seed yield.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Soybean · G×E interaction · seed yield

Abstract

The study was aimed to evaluate the adaptability and stability of the soybean genotypes based on the seed yield and the other observed characteristics in the sites cultivated second crop soybean of Turkey which have Mediterranean climate conditions using the GGE biplot analysis method. The experiments were performed under irrigated conditions in 2014, 2015 and 2016 in four different locations (Adana, Antalya, Izmir and Sanliurfa) of Turkey. Fourteen soybean genotypes consisting of 10 advanced soybean lines and four standard varieties were analyzed by a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. The combined analysis of variance revealed significant (P<0.01) effects for all sources of variation (environment, genotype, and G×E interaction) for the seed yield and yield components. Genotype and environment accounted for about 2.59% and 51.04% of the total variation for seed yield, respectively, while the GE interaction explained 20.84% of the total variation. According to the GGE principle, five mega-environments were formed in the present study. Results of the research revealed that genotypes G8 (KANA), G9 (KASM 02), G11 (ARISOY), G3 (BATEM 306), G1 (BATEM 207) and G12 (ATAEM 7) were found as stable. According to GGE Biplot analysis for all traits and genotypes, G4 (BATEM 317) had the largest values for plant height, first pod height, days to 50% flowering, days to maturity and seed yield.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCATURK, M., CUBUKCU, P., GOKSOY, A. T., SINCIK, M., ILKER, E., KADIROGLU, A., VURARAK, Y., SAHIN, Y., KARAKUS, M., YILDIRIM, U. A. (2019). GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS OF GENOTYPE × ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN SOYBEAN GROWN AS A SECOND CROP. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 145–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/180729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akcura, M., K. Akan and O. Hocaoglu. 2017. Biplot analysis of leaf rust resistance in pure lines selected from Eastern Anatolian bread wheat landraces of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(2): 227-234.
  2. Amira, J.O., D.K. Ojo, O.J. Ariyo, O.A. Oduwaye, and M.A. Ayo-Vaughan. 2013. Relative discriminating powers of GGE and AMMI models in the selection of tropical soybean genotypes. African Crop Science Journal 21(1): 67-73.
  3. Bakal, H., L. Gulluoglu, B. Onat, and H. Arioglu. 2017. The effect of the growing season on some agronomic and quality characteristics of soybean varieties in the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(2): 187- 196. Bhartiya, A., J.P. Aditya, P. Singh, J.P. Purwar and A. Aga. 2017. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trial of soybean in North Western Himalayan state Uttarakhand of India. Legume Research 40(2): 306-312.
  4. Bowman, J.C. 1972. Genotype by environmental interactions. Ann Genet Anim. 4(1): 117-123.
  5. Caliskan, S., M. Arslan, I. Uremis and M.E. Caliskan. 2007. The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double cropped soybean. Turk J Agric and For. 31: 147-154.
  6. Cavalcanti, A.K., O.T. Hamawaki, R.L. Hamawaki, L.B. Sousa, A.P. Nogueira and C.D.L. Hamawaki. 2014. Phenotypic adaptability and stability in soybean genotypes in Porto Alegre do Norte. State of Mato Grosso Bioscie J. 30: 942- 949. Cheelo, P., D. Lungu and M. Mwala. 2017. GGE biplot analysis for identification of ideal soybean [Glycine max L. Merrill] test and production locations in Zambia. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 15(3): 1-15.
  7. Delacy, I.H., K.E. Basford, M. Cooper and J.K. Bull. 1996. Analysis of Multienvironment Trials- an Historical Perspective. Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement. Eds. M. Cooper and G. L. Hammer. CAB International. Edugbo, R.E., G.E. Nwofia and L.S. Fayeun. 2015. An assessment of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) grain yield in different environments using AMMI and GGE biplot models in humidorest fringes of southeast Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica 48(3-4): 82-90.
  8. Farshadfar, E., R. Mohammadi, M. Aghaee and Z. Vaisi. 2012. GGE biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. Aust J Crop Sci. 6(6): 1074-1079.
  9. Gurmu, F., H. Mohammed and G. Alemaw. 2009. Genotype and environment interaction and stability of soybean for grain yield and nutritional quality. African Crop Science Journal 17: 87-99.