Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

THE IMPORTANCE OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE THICKNESS FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER LUMBAR DISC SURGERY

Pages
245–250
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We found that that a long distance between the lamina and skin in women might be a risk factor for the occurrence of surgical wound infections.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Previous studies have shown that the length of the surgical path is important in surgical wound infection after a major lumbar surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 1,275 patients who underwent lumbar disc surgery between 2015 and 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We found that that a long distance between the lamina and skin in women might be a risk factor for the occurrence of surgical wound infections.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Previous studies have shown that the length of the surgical path is important in surgical wound infection after a major lumbar surgery. We investigated for the first time the relationship between wound infection occurrence after lumbar disc surgery and subcutaneous tissue thickness. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 1,275 patients who underwent lumbar disc surgery between 2015 and 2020. Of these, 32 patients were hospitalised with a diagnosis of surgical superficial or deep wound infection. Demographic data, comorbidities, body mass index and body surface areas (BSAs) of the patients were recorded. Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and distance from the lamina to the skin were measured on magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Results were compared with that of the control group. Results: Superficial and deep wound infections were detected in 62.5% and 37.5% of patients, respectively. Age (p=0.182), comorbidities (p=0.425), body mass index (p=0.182), BSA (p=0.569) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (p=0.110) did not contribute to the occurrence of wound infection after lumbar disc surgery. However, the distance between the lamina and skin (p=0.017) was found to be statistically different in women with a wound infection. Conclusion: We found that that a long distance between the lamina and skin in women might be a risk factor for the occurrence of surgical wound infections.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLEÇ, İ., GÜZEY, F. K. (2020). THE IMPORTANCE OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE THICKNESS FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER LUMBAR DISC SURGERY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 245–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/180477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Webb ML, Nelson SJ, Save AV, Cui JJ, Lukasiewicz AM, Samuel AM, Cui JJ, Lukasiewicz AM, Samuel AM, et al. Of 20,376 Lumbar Discectomies, 2.6% of Patients Readmitted Within 30 Days. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:1267-73
  2. Ogihara S, Yamazaki T, Inanami H, Oka H, Maruyama T, Miyoshi K, Oka H, Maruyama T, Miyoshi K, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after lumbar laminectomy and/or discectomy for degenerative diseases in adults: A prospective multicenter surveillance study with registry of 4027 cases. PLoS One. 2018;13:1-10
  3. Shousha M, Cirovic D, Boehm H. Infection rate after minimally invasive noninstrumented spinal surgery based on 4350 procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:201-5
  4. Golinvaux NS, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Yacob A, Grauer JN. Comparison of the lumbar disc herniation patients randomized in SPORT to 6,846 discectomy patients from NSQIP: Demographics, perioperative variables, and complications correlate well. Spine J. 2015;15:685-91
  5. Shriver MF, Xie JJ, Tye EY, Rosenbaum BP, Kshettry VR, Benxel EC, et al. Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E6
  6. Sherman J, Cauthen J, Schoenberg D, Burns M, Reaven NL, Griffith SL. Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. Spine J. 2015;10:108-16
  7. Fakouri B, Stovell MG, Allom R. A Comparative Cohort Study of Lumbar Microdiscectomy in Obese and Nonobese Patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E352-7
  8. Xing D, Ma JX, Ma XL, Song DH, Wang J, Chen Y, et al. A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:605-15
  9. Yao R, Zhou H, Choma TJ, Kwon BK, Street J. Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk? Glob Spine J. 2018;8:5S-30S
  10. Esfahani DR, Shah H, Arnone GD, Scheer JK, Mehta AI. Lumbar Discectomy Outcomes by Specialty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 7464 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Database. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:e865-70
  11. Leven D, Passias PG, Errico TJ, Lafage V, Bianco K, Lee A, et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation: A subanalysis of eight-year sport data. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2015;97:1316-25
  12. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: An analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38