Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of Sea Buckthorn Genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Based on RAPD and FAME Data

Pages
363–368
Publication Date
2008-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:FAME and RAPD profiles were used to examine biochemical and genetic relationships between 10 selected sea buckthorn genotypes found in the same area of Eastern Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Myristic acid was detected only in berries of the ESB8 and ESB9 genotypes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biochemical and molecular markers · fatty acids · Hippophae rhamnoides

Abstract

FAME and RAPD profiles were used to examine biochemical and genetic relationships between 10 selected sea buckthorn genotypes found in the same area of Eastern Anatolia. Fatty acid composition of sea buckthorn berries was determined using gas chromatography. Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries. Myristic acid was detected only in berries of the ESB8 and ESB9 genotypes. Nervonic acid was detected only in the ESB5 genotype and linoleic acid was detected only in the ESB4 genotype. RAPD data also showed that the ESB4 genotype was in a group distinct from the others. According to these results, it can be concluded that both the absence of linoleic acid and the use of RAPD data could be useful indicators for the characterization and grouping of sea buckthorn genotypes.

Özet

FAME and RAPD profiles were used to examine biochemical and genetic relationships between 10 selected sea buckthorn genotypes found in the same area of Eastern Anatolia. Fatty acid composition of sea buckthorn berries was determined using gas chromatography. Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries. Myristic acid was detected only in berries of the ESB8 and ESB9 genotypes. Nervonic acid was detected only in the ESB5 genotype and linoleic acid was detected only in the ESB4 genotype. RAPD data also showed that the ESB4 genotype was in a group distinct from the others. According to these results, it can be concluded that both the absence of linoleic acid and the use of RAPD data could be useful indicators for the characterization and grouping of sea buckthorn genotypes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERCİŞLİ, S., ORHAN, E., YILDIRIM, N., AĞAR, G. (2008). Comparison of Sea Buckthorn Genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Based on RAPD and FAME Data. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5, 363–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/180301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ağar, G., A. Adıguzel, O. Barış, M. Şengül, M. Güllüce, F. Şahin and O.F. Bayrak. 2006. RAPD and FAME analyses of Vicia species growing in eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Ann. Bot. Fennici. 43: 241- 249. Aitzetmuller, K. 1993. Capillary GLC fatty acid fingerprints of seed lipids-a tool in plant chemotaxonomy? J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 16: 488-490.
  2. Baytop, T. 1999. Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (Past and Present). Nobel Press, İstanbul (in Turkish). Bekker, N.P. and A.I. Glushenkova. 2001. Components of certain species of the Elaeagnaceae family. Chem. Nat. Compds. 37: 97- 116. Chen G., Y. Wang, C. Zhao, H. Korpelainen and C. Li. 2008. Genetic diversity of Hippophae rhamnoides populations at varying altitudes in the wolong natural reserve of China as revealed by ISSR markers. Silvae Gen. 57: 29-36.
  3. Çakır, A. 2004. Essential oil and fatty acid composition of the fruits of Hippophae rhamnoides L. (Sea Buckthorn) and Myrtus communis L. from Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol. 32: 809-816.
  4. Ercişli S., E. Orhan, Ö. Özdemir and M. Şengül. 2007a. The genotypic effects on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries grown in Turkey. Scientia Hort. 115: 27-33.
  5. Ercişli, S., G. Ağar, E. Orhan, N. Yıldırım and Y. Hızarcı. 2007b. Interspecific variability of RAPD and fatty acid composition of some pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) growing in Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol. 35: 764- 769. Kawecki, Z., M. Szalkiewicz and A. Bieniek. 2004. The common sea buckthorn-a valuable fruit. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 12: 183- 193. Lin R.C., Z.S. Ding, L.B. Li and T.Y. Kuang. 2001. A rapid and efficient DNA minipreparation suitable for screening transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 19: 379a-379e. Liu R., J. Yang and L. Gao. 2007. ISSR analysis of Chinese seabuckthorn and Russian seabuckthorn. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occid. Sin. 27: 671- 677. Özen, H.C., M. Başhan, Z. Toker and C. Keskin. 2004. 3-Hydroxy fatty acids from the flowers of Hypericum lysimachioides. Turk. J. Chem. 28: 223-226.
  6. Ranjith, A., K.S. Kumar, V.V. Venugopalan, C. Arumughan, R.C. Sawhney and V. Singh. 2006. Fatty acids, tocols, and carotenoids in pulp oil of three sea buckthorn species (H. rhamnoides, H. salicifolia, and H. tibetana) grown in the Indian Himalayas. JAOCS. 88: 359-364.
  7. Ruan, C. and D.Q. Li. 2002. Analysis on the community characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides L. plantation and water and nutrition of woodland