Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2007 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5

Determination of Superior Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) Genotypes by Selection under the Ecological Conditions of Samsun Province, Turkey

Pages
335–347
Publication Date
2007-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that populations were significantly different in pod length, width, longitudinal section shape, shell thickness, color, suture string, and curvature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Species belonging to the family Leguminosae are widely grown in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pinto) under the ecological conditions of Samsun in 2003 and 2004.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that populations were significantly different in pod length, width, longitudinal section shape, shell thickness, color, suture string, and curvature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris var. Pinto) · genotype · selection

Abstract

Species belonging to the family Leguminosae are widely grown in Turkey. Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) is a traditional crop in Turkey and farmers grow local varieties that they select and maintain. Pinto bean is an important food in Samsun province, Turkey. Its crop is consumed as fresh pods, and fresh pod seed or dry seeds. This study was conducted in order to select valuable genetic resources of the pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) under the ecological conditions of Samsun in 2003 and 2004. In the first year, 44 pinto bean populations were collected and evaluated according to their morphological, earliness, and yield traits. The results showed that populations were significantly different in pod length, width, longitudinal section shape, shell thickness, color, suture string, and curvature. From the observations, 10 genotypes were evaluated as superior using a weight-based ranking method for fresh pod and fresh grain pod in the first year of the study. In the second year, from these selected genotypes 4 genotypes (55ÇA07, 55ÇA15, 55TE15, and 55TE20) for fresh pods and 5 genotypes (55ÇA01, 55ÇA05, 55ÇA15, 55ÇA24, and 55TE15) for fresh grain pods were determined as promising genotypes. At the end of this research, selected genotypes will be used in the development of new promising pinto bean varieties.

Özet

Species belonging to the family Leguminosae are widely grown in Turkey. Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) is a traditional crop in Turkey and farmers grow local varieties that they select and maintain. Pinto bean is an important food in Samsun province, Turkey. Its crop is consumed as fresh pods, and fresh pod seed or dry seeds. This study was conducted in order to select valuable genetic resources of the pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) under the ecological conditions of Samsun in 2003 and 2004. In the first year, 44 pinto bean populations were collected and evaluated according to their morphological, earliness, and yield traits. The results showed that populations were significantly different in pod length, width, longitudinal section shape, shell thickness, color, suture string, and curvature. From the observations, 10 genotypes were evaluated as superior using a weight-based ranking method for fresh pod and fresh grain pod in the first year of the study. In the second year, from these selected genotypes 4 genotypes (55ÇA07, 55ÇA15, 55TE15, and 55TE20) for fresh pods and 5 genotypes (55ÇA01, 55ÇA05, 55ÇA15, 55ÇA24, and 55TE15) for fresh grain pods were determined as promising genotypes. At the end of this research, selected genotypes will be used in the development of new promising pinto bean varieties.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALKAYA, A., ERGÜN, A. (2007). Determination of Superior Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. Pinto) Genotypes by Selection under the Ecological Conditions of Samsun Province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5, 335–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/180211

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Balkaya, A. and R. Yanmaz. 1999. Karadeniz Bölgesi taze fasulye populasyonlarından teksel seleksiyon yoluyla geliştirilen çeşit adayları. Türkiye III. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi. Sayfa: 504- 508, Ankara.
  2. Balkaya, A., R. Yanmaz, H. Bozoğlu and A. Gülümser. 1999. Samsun ilinin taze fasulye yetiştiriciliği yönünden durumunun belirlenmesi. Karadeniz Bölgesi Tarım Sempozyumu. Bildiriler. Cilt:1, Sayfa: 51-62,
  3. Samsun. Balkaya, A. and R. Yanmaz. 2001. Bitki genetik kaynaklarının muhafaza imkanları ve tohum gen bankalarının çalışma sistemleri. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi. 39: 25-30.
  4. Balkaya, A. and S. Odabaş. 2004. Samsun koşullarında ekim zamanının barbunya fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yetiştiriciliğinde erkencilik, verim ve bazı kalite özellikleri üzerine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Bahçe Dergisi. 33: 7-15.
  5. Balkaya, A. and R. Yanmaz. 2005. Promising kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala ) populations from Black Sea region in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 33: 1-7.
  6. Baş, T., J. Koludar and Z. Caymazer. 1991. Fasulye Araştırmaları Projesi (Ege Dilimi). 1991 Yılı Gelişme Raporu. Menemen - İzmir.
  7. Bayraktar, K. 1981. Sebze Yetiştirme. Cilt-III. Sebzelerde Tohum Üretimi. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları No: 244. 356s. Bornova- İzmir.
  8. Bliss, F.A. 1980. Common Bean. In: Hybridization of Crop Plants (Eds. W.R. Fehr and H.H. Handley), American Society of Agronomy- Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 273- 284. DİE, 2005. Tarımsal Yapı ve Üretim. T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü. Yayın No: 2949. Ankara. DMİGM, 2005. Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü. Samsun İl Müdürlüğü Kayıtları. Escribano, M.R., M. Santalla and A.M. Ron. 1997. Genetic diversity in pod and seed quality traits of common bean populations from northwestern Spain. Euphytica. 93: 71-81.
  9. Gepts, P. and F.A. Bliss. 1986. Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Econ. Bot. 40: 469-478.
  10. Gepts, P. and F.A. Bliss. 1988. Dissemination paths of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) deduced from phaseolin electrophoretic variability. II. Europe and Africa. Econ. Bot. 42: 86-104.
  11. Gil, J. and A.M. Ron. 1992. Variation inPhaseolus vulgaris in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Breeding. 109: 313- 319. Günay, A. 1992. Özel Sebze Yetiştiriciliği. Cilt 4. Sayfa: 81-91,
  12. Ankara Martins, S.R., F.J. Vences, L.E. Miera, M.R. Barroso and V. Carnide. 2006. RAPD analysis of genetic diversity amon