Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Time-dependent changes in distribution patterns of soil bulk density and penetration resistance in a rangeland under overgrazing

Pages
195–204
Publication Date
2011-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the mean bulk density did not show a clear trend with grazing intervals and produced values of 0.88, 0.93, and 0.82 g cm-3 for July, August, and September, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:High soil bulk density and penetration resistance as an indication of soil compaction affect soil infiltration and runoff.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this study was to determine changes in soil bulk density and penetration resistance in a high altitude rangeland within a 3-month grazing period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the mean bulk density did not show a clear trend with grazing intervals and produced values of 0.88, 0.93, and 0.82 g cm-3 for July, August, and September, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Bulk density · overgrazing · penetration resistance

Abstract

High soil bulk density and penetration resistance as an indication of soil compaction affect soil infiltration and runoff. Overgrazed rangelands are under severe erosion risk because of soil compaction. The objective of this study was to determine changes in soil bulk density and penetration resistance in a high altitude rangeland within a 3-month grazing period. A 5-ha rangeland (200 × 250 m) was transected with intervals of 25 × 5 m, and soil penetration resistance was measured at 459 points in the 20-cm surface soil layer on 3 different dates (15 July, 15 August, and 15 September). At each intersection of the 50 × 50 m interval grid system, 30 undisturbed soil samples were taken to determine soil bulk density. Semivariogram and punctual kriging analyses were used to define spatial variability in bulk density and penetration resistance measurements. The results indicated that the mean bulk density did not show a clear trend with grazing intervals and produced values of 0.88, 0.93, and 0.82 g cm-3 for July, August, and September, respectively. Soil penetration resistance was higher than the critical penetration resistance (3 MPa) for root growth at all measurement points. The mean soil penetration resistance increased about 8.5% in August as compared with July, and it was more or less constant in the following month.

Özet

High soil bulk density and penetration resistance as an indication of soil compaction affect soil infiltration and runoff. Overgrazed rangelands are under severe erosion risk because of soil compaction. The objective of this study was to determine changes in soil bulk density and penetration resistance in a high altitude rangeland within a 3-month grazing period. A 5-ha rangeland (200 × 250 m) was transected with intervals of 25 × 5 m, and soil penetration resistance was measured at 459 points in the 20-cm surface soil layer on 3 different dates (15 July, 15 August, and 15 September). At each intersection of the 50 × 50 m interval grid system, 30 undisturbed soil samples were taken to determine soil bulk density. Semivariogram and punctual kriging analyses were used to define spatial variability in bulk density and penetration resistance measurements. The results indicated that the mean bulk density did not show a clear trend with grazing intervals and produced values of 0.88, 0.93, and 0.82 g cm-3 for July, August, and September, respectively. Soil penetration resistance was higher than the critical penetration resistance (3 MPa) for root growth at all measurement points. The mean soil penetration resistance increased about 8.5% in August as compared with July, and it was more or less constant in the following month.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSAKAL, E. L., ÖZTAŞ, T., ÖZGÜL, M. (2011). Time-dependent changes in distribution patterns of soil bulk density and penetration resistance in a rangeland under overgrazing. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 195–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/180050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aksakal EL, Öztaş T (2010) Changes in distribution patterns of soil penetration resistance within a silage-corn field following the use of heavy harvesting equipments. Turk J Agric For 34: 173- 179. Azenegashe OA, Allen VG, Fontenot JP (1997) Grazing sheep and cattle together or separately: effect on soil and plants. Agron J 89: 380-386.
  2. Bayat H, Neyshabouri MR, Hajabbasi MA, Mahboubi AA, Mosaddeghi MR (2008) Comparing neural networks, linear and nonlinear regression techniques to model penetration resistance. Turk J Agric For 32: 425-433.
  3. Berg M, Klamt E, van Reeuwijk LP, Sombroek WG (1997) Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils. Geoderma 78: 161- 180. Betteridge K, Mackay AD, Shepherd TG, Barker DJ, Budding PJ, Devantier BP, Costall DA (1999) Effect of cattle and sheep treading on surface configuration of a sedimentary hill soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37: 743-760.
  4. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. (Ed. A Klute). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 363-375.
  5. Busscher WJ, Bauer PJ, Camp CR, Sojka RE (1997) Correction of cone index for soil water content differences in a coastal plain soil. Soil Till Res 43: 205-217.
  6. Busscher WJ, Sojka RE (1987) Enhancement of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservation tillage. Transactions of the ASAE 30: 888-892.
  7. Chanasyk DS, Naeth MA (1995) Grazing impacts of bulk density and soil strength in the foothill fescue grasslands of Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75: 551-557. da Silva AP, Imhoff S, Corsi M (2003) Evaluation of soil compaction in an irrigated short-duration grazing system. Soil and Tillage Research 70: 83-90.
  8. Dadkhah M, Gifford GF (1981) Influence of vegetation, rock cover, and trampling on infiltration rates and sediment production. J Ame Water Resources Association 16: 979-986.
  9. Donkor NT, Gedir JV, Hudson RJ, Bork EW, Chanasyk DS, Naeth MA (2002) Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta. Can J Soil Sci 82: 1-8.
  10. Du Toit GN, Snyman HA, Malan PJ (2009) Physical impact of grazing by sheep on soil parameters in the Nama Karoo subshrub/grass rangeland of South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 73: 804-810.
  11. Ehlers W, Köpke U, Hesse F, Böhm W (1983) Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilled and untilled loess soil