Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Changes in distribution patterns of soil penetration resistance within a silage-corn field following the use of heavy harvesting equipments

Pages
173–179
Publication Date
2010-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patterns of variation in soil penetration resistance following harvesting showed remarkable differences compared to pre-harvesting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil compaction caused by heavy wheeling reduces water infiltration, root development, and yield, and increases bulk density and soil strength.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Soil penetration resistance was measured in a 100 × 400 m field with 10 m intervals just before and after harvesting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patterns of variation in soil penetration resistance following harvesting showed remarkable differences compared to pre-harvesting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2097 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Aggregate stability · bulk density · kriging

Abstract

Soil compaction caused by heavy wheeling reduces water infiltration, root development, and yield, and increases bulk density and soil strength. The objective of this study was to determine changes in spatial variability patterns of soil penetration resistance before and after using the silage machine in a corn-growing field. Soil penetration resistance was measured in a 100 × 400 m field with 10 m intervals just before and after harvesting. Measurements were taken from the 20 cm top layer on rows and inter-rows throughout each transect. The mean penetration resistance of 1353 measurements before and after harvesting was 2097 and 3116 kPa, respectively. Average bulk density within the field increased from 1.14 g cm-3 to 1.46 g cm-3, but wet aggregate stability decreased from 33.4% to 17.9% following harvesting. Punctual kriging analysis was performed to prepare distribution maps of soil penetration resistance with 1 m intervals within the field. The patterns of variation in soil penetration resistance following harvesting showed remarkable differences compared to pre-harvesting.

Özet

Soil compaction caused by heavy wheeling reduces water infiltration, root development, and yield, and increases bulk density and soil strength. The objective of this study was to determine changes in spatial variability patterns of soil penetration resistance before and after using the silage machine in a corn-growing field. Soil penetration resistance was measured in a 100 × 400 m field with 10 m intervals just before and after harvesting. Measurements were taken from the 20 cm top layer on rows and inter-rows throughout each transect. The mean penetration resistance of 1353 measurements before and after harvesting was 2097 and 3116 kPa, respectively. Average bulk density within the field increased from 1.14 g cm-3 to 1.46 g cm-3, but wet aggregate stability decreased from 33.4% to 17.9% following harvesting. Punctual kriging analysis was performed to prepare distribution maps of soil penetration resistance with 1 m intervals within the field. The patterns of variation in soil penetration resistance following harvesting showed remarkable differences compared to pre-harvesting.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSAKAL, E. L., ÖZTAŞ, T. (2010). Changes in distribution patterns of soil penetration resistance within a silage-corn field following the use of heavy harvesting equipments. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 173–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/192385

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barfield BJ, Barnhisel RI, Hirschi MC, Moore ID (1988) Compaction effects on erosion of mine spoil and reconstructed topsoil. Trans of the ASAE 31: 447-452.
  2. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed (Ed. A Klute), American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 363-375.
  3. Brais S (2001) Persistance of soil compaction and effects on seedling growth in Northwestern Quebec. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1263- 1271. Busscher WJ, Bauer PJ (2003) Soil strength, cotton root growth and lint yield in a southeastern USA coastal loamy sand. Soil and Tillage Research 74: 51-159.
  4. Busscher WJ, Sojka RE (1987) Enhancement of subsoiling effect on soil strength by conservational tillage. Transactions of the ASAE 30: 888-892.
  5. Dexter AR (1997) Physical properties of tilled soils. Soil and Tillage Res 43: 41-63.
  6. Gamma Design Software (2005) GS+ Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences. GS+ User’s Guide, Ver 7, Plainwell, MI, USA. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed (Ed. A Klute), American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 383-411.
  7. Gomez A, Powers RF, Singer MJ, Horwath WR (2002) Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California’s Sierra Nevada. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 1334-1343.
  8. Gupta SC, Hadas A, Voorhees WB, Wolf D, Larson WE, Sharma PP (1990) Development of guides on the susceptibility of soils to excessive compaction. University of Minnesota, BARD Report, St Paul. Hakansson I, Medvedev VW (1995) Protection of soils from mechanical overloading by establishing limits for stresses caused by heavy vehicles. Soil and Tillage Res 35: 85-97.
  9. Hakansson I, Voorhees WB, Elonen P, Raghavan GNS, Lowery B, van Wijk ALM, Rasmussen K, Riley H (1987) Effect of high axle- load traffic on subsoil compaction and crop yield in humid regions with annual freezing. Soil and Tillage Res 10: 259-268.
  10. Herrick JE, Jones TL (2002) A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 1320-1324.
  11. Horn R, Domzal H, Jurkiewicz AS, Ouwerkerk CV (1995) Soil compaction processes and their effects on the structure of arable soils and the environment. Soil and Tillage Res 35: 23-36.
  12. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press,