Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

Smart biologics for crop protection in agricultural systems

Pages
723–731
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review focuses on the current knowledge regarding biological agents and their metabolites including quorum-sensing molecules and volatile compounds, and how they can be used in pest and disease management programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Crop losses caused by insects, pests, and pathogens remain one of the major problems in sustainable agriculture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Environmental and health concerns regarding the overuse of pesticides, and the impacts of climate change on epidemics are immediate pressing issues.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review focuses on the current knowledge regarding biological agents and their metabolites including quorum-sensing molecules and volatile compounds, and how they can be used in pest and disease management programs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Crop protection · Bacillus · Trichoderma

Abstract

Crop losses caused by insects, pests, and pathogens remain one of the major problems in sustainable agriculture. Environmental and health concerns regarding the overuse of pesticides, and the impacts of climate change on epidemics are immediate pressing issues. In addition, the breakdown of plant resistance by pathogen populations brings limitations to the genetic control of diseases. Biologics can be effective in all types of agricultural systems including organic, sustainable, and conventional. Beneficial microorganisms including Bacillus and Trichoderma species have been employed as environmentally safe biopesticides. Molecular and proteomic studies on biopesticides have revealed the nature of antibiotics, secreted enzymes, and inhibitory compounds. This review focuses on the current knowledge regarding biological agents and their metabolites including quorum-sensing molecules and volatile compounds, and how they can be used in pest and disease management programs.

Özet

Crop losses caused by insects, pests, and pathogens remain one of the major problems in sustainable agriculture. Environmental and health concerns regarding the overuse of pesticides, and the impacts of climate change on epidemics are immediate pressing issues. In addition, the breakdown of plant resistance by pathogen populations brings limitations to the genetic control of diseases. Biologics can be effective in all types of agricultural systems including organic, sustainable, and conventional. Beneficial microorganisms including Bacillus and Trichoderma species have been employed as environmentally safe biopesticides. Molecular and proteomic studies on biopesticides have revealed the nature of antibiotics, secreted enzymes, and inhibitory compounds. This review focuses on the current knowledge regarding biological agents and their metabolites including quorum-sensing molecules and volatile compounds, and how they can be used in pest and disease management programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYSAL, Ö., TÖR, M. (2014). Smart biologics for crop protection in agricultural systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 723–731. https://ajindex.com/articles/179733

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Madhaiyan et al. (2006) Bacillus circulans DUC1, B. firmus DUC2, B. Root and shoot elongation globisporus DUC3 Ghosh et al. (2003) Pseudomonas sp. Bradyrhizobium sp. Promoted nodulation Shaharoona et al. (2006) Antibiotics Fusarium oxysporum Koumoutsi et al. (2004) Lysobacter sp. strain SB-K88 Aphanomyces cochlioides Islam et al. (2005) B. subtilis QST713 Botrytis cinerea and R. Solani Paulitz and Belanger (2001),
  2. Kloepper et al. (2004) B. subtilis BBG100 Pythium aphanidermatum Leclere et al. (2005) P. fluorescens 2-79 and 30-84 Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici Thomashow et al. (1990)
  3. Bacillus subtilis, EU07 Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis Baysal et al. (2008; 2013) lycopersici Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 Peronospora parasitica Iavicoli et al. (2003) Lytic enzymes such as chitinases and proteases Fusarium udum Rangeshwaran and Prasad (2000) T. harzianum Penicillium expansum Batta (2004) B. subtilis Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis Baysal et al. (2008; 2013) lycopersici Volatile organic compounds 2,3-butanediol Ryu et al. (2004) Pseudomonas Putida WCS 358, BTP1 Lipopolysaccharide, Siderophore, Z,3- hexenal Meziane et al. (2005)
  4. Ongena et al. (2004) Bacillus subtilis EU07 2,3-butanediol, acetoin Baysal et al. (2013) Bacillus pumilus 203-6 Peroxidase, β-1,3-glucanase Bargabus et al. (2004) Phages Isolated and characterized in vitro for Boulé et al. (2011) control of E. amylovora. In greenhouse trials, pretreatment of tomato seedlings with RSL1 prevented bacterial wilt in all plants Isolated and partly characterized in vitro for control of R. solanecearum. In addition to microbes, phytopathogen-specific phages have potential for biocontrol. It is necessary to test their efficacy in relation to plant disease before scaling up phage preparations, which requires knowledge about the characteristics and lifestyle of the phages (Ackermann et al., 2004). The table summarizes the results of phage trials that have been performed on a range of phytopathogens including Erwinia amylovora and Ralstonia solanacearum. However, field trials are biologically complex and the presence of other microbes and pathogens can influence the effectiveness of the phages when introduced into fields (Adriaenssens et al., 2012). 9. Conclusion Soils are, to some extent, living laboratories where the complex interactions between microorganisms result in disease suppression. Characterization of biological communities in soil has proved to be a formidable challenge, and the natur