Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

Insect-resistant transgenic crops: retrospect and challenges

Pages
531
Publication Date
2015-08-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The first part of this review focuses the development of different insect-resistantcrops and various strategies adapted to delay resistance development in insect pests, while the second part addresses the challenges andfuture prospects of insect-resistant crops.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The advent of genetic engineering has revolutionized agriculture remarkably with the development of superior insect-resistantcrop varieties harboring resistance against insect pests.Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been used as a main source for insect-resistantgenes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cultivation of insect-resistant cultivars has resulted both in increased crop productivity and in decreased environmentalpollution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first part of this review focuses the development of different insect-resistantcrops and various strategies adapted to delay resistance development in insect pests, while the second part addresses the challenges andfuture prospects of insect-resistant crops.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transgenic Bt crops · adaptation · economic impact

Abstract

The advent of genetic engineering has revolutionized agriculture remarkably with the development of superior insect-resistantcrop varieties harboring resistance against insect pests.Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been used as a main source for insect-resistantgenes. In addition to Bt endotoxins, various plant lectins and other non-Bt genes from different sources have also been introduced incrop plants of economic importance. The insect-resistant crops have made a huge economic impact worldwide since their commercialrelease. The cultivation of insect-resistant cultivars has resulted both in increased crop productivity and in decreased environmentalpollution. Although insect-resistant crops have been allowed to be commercialized following proper biosafety guidelines and procedures,still these crops face many challenges in order to be fully adopted and accepted. The degradation kinetics of Bt proteins, horizontal andvertical gene flow, effects on nontarget insects or organisms, antibiotic resistance, and some other unintended effects have been notedand discussed. Although no concrete evidence regarding any significant hazard of genetically engineered crops has been presented sofar, the debate still remains intense. Impartial and professionally competent regulatory mechanisms for the evaluation of insect-resistantand other transgenic crops must be fully functionalized. The first part of this review focuses the development of different insect-resistantcrops and various strategies adapted to delay resistance development in insect pests, while the second part addresses the challenges andfuture prospects of insect-resistant crops.

Özet

The advent of genetic engineering has revolutionized agriculture remarkably with the development of superior insect-resistantcrop varieties harboring resistance against insect pests.Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has been used as a main source for insect-resistantgenes. In addition to Bt endotoxins, various plant lectins and other non-Bt genes from different sources have also been introduced incrop plants of economic importance. The insect-resistant crops have made a huge economic impact worldwide since their commercialrelease. The cultivation of insect-resistant cultivars has resulted both in increased crop productivity and in decreased environmentalpollution. Although insect-resistant crops have been allowed to be commercialized following proper biosafety guidelines and procedures,still these crops face many challenges in order to be fully adopted and accepted. The degradation kinetics of Bt proteins, horizontal andvertical gene flow, effects on nontarget insects or organisms, antibiotic resistance, and some other unintended effects have been notedand discussed. Although no concrete evidence regarding any significant hazard of genetically engineered crops has been presented sofar, the debate still remains intense. Impartial and professionally competent regulatory mechanisms for the evaluation of insect-resistantand other transgenic crops must be fully functionalized. The first part of this review focuses the development of different insect-resistantcrops and various strategies adapted to delay resistance development in insect pests, while the second part addresses the challenges andfuture prospects of insect-resistant crops.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKHSH, A., KHABBAZI, S. D., BALOCH, F. S., DEMİREL, U., ÇALIŞKAN, M. E., HATİPOĞLU, R., ÖZCAN, S., ÖZKAN, H. (2015). Insect-resistant transgenic crops: retrospect and challenges. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 531. https://ajindex.com/articles/179717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Yonemochi et al., 2002 Bt endotoxin (Bt-176) Mouse Brake et al., 2004 cry3Bb1 Rat Hammond et al., 2006 cry1Ab Salmon Sagstad et al., 2007 cry3Bb1 Rat Séralini et al., 2007 cry1Ab (MON810) Salmon Bakke-McKellep et al., 2008 Potato Mouse Fares and El-Sayed, 1998 GNA Rat Ewen and Pusztai, 1999 Rice Zhuo et al., 2004 cry1Ab (KMDI) Rat Schrİder et al., 2007 GNA Rat Poulsen et al., 2007a PHA-E lectin Rat Poulsen et al., 2007b cry1Ac and sck Rat Zhang et al., 2013 Tomato cry1Ab Rat The increasing world population, to reach 9.7 billion in 2050, is a true challenge for the scientific community. We cannot feed tomorrow’s population with yesterday’s technology. Therefore, we cannot ignore the huge potential of transgenic technology to enhance the food supply for an increasing population. Following proper biosafety guidelines, integration of modern technologies to develop insect-resistant crops in conventional breeding methods and their economic benefits downstream are quite promising for the future of agriculture. Acharjee S, Sarmah BK, Kumar PA, Olsen K, Mahon R, Moar WJ, Moore A, Higgins TJV (2010). Expression of a sequence modified cry2Aa gene for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Sci 178: 333–339.
  2. Adang MJ, Brody MS, Cardineau G, Eagan N, Roush RT, Shewmaker CK, Jones A, Oakes JE, McBride KE (1993). The reconstruction and expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cryIIIA gene in protoplasts and potato plants. Plant Mol Biol 21: 1131–1145.
  3. Andrews RW, Fausr R, Wabiko MH, Roymond KC, Bulla LA (1987). Biotechnology of Bt: a critical review. Bio/Technology 6: 163– 232. Arjó G, Portero M, Piñol C, Viñas J, Matias-Guiu X, Capell T, Bartholomaeus A, Parrott W, Christou P (2013). Plurality of opinion, scientiŞc discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study claiming that Roundup™ Ready corn or the herbicide Roundup™ cause cancer in rats. Transgenic Res 22: 255–267.
  4. Azadi H, Ho P (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: a review of options for food security. Biotechnol Adv 28: 160–168.
  5. Badosa E, Moreno C, Montesinos E (2004). Lack of detection of ampicillin resistance gene transfer from Bt176 transgenic corn to culturable bacteria under field conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48: 169–178.
  6. Bakhsh A, Rao AQ, Shahid AA, Husnain T, Riazuddin S (2009). Insect resistance and risk assessment studies in advance lines of Bt cotton harboring Cry1Ac and Cry2A genes. Am Eur J Agric Envi