SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level

Azhar MAHMOOD
Sheikh Tariq MAHMOOD
Allah Bakhsh MALIK
Pages
128–136
Publication Date
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the basis of findings, It was concluded that distance learning and traditional classroom students experienced a high level of satisfaction .It was determined that there was very slightly difference in the levels of student satisfaction in the distance learning and traditional classroom students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The technology has embraced the innovative learning methodologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Population of the study consisted of Graduate students in course educational psychology during fall semester 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the basis of findings, It was concluded that distance learning and traditional classroom students experienced a high level of satisfaction .It was determined that there was very slightly difference in the levels of student satisfaction in the distance learning and traditional classroom students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distance Learning · Traditional Classroom Learning · Student Satisfaction

Abstract

The technology has embraced the innovative learning methodologies. Distance Learning has taken the place of traditional face-to-face educational environment. The purpose of this study was to compare the level of student satisfaction of graduate distance learning educational psychology course to a traditional classroom educational psychology course taught by the same instructor. Population of the study consisted of Graduate students in course educational psychology during fall semester 2009. Study was descriptive in nature and findings were drawn after the descriptive analysis. Likert scale was used to determine the level of satisfaction between both groups. On the basis of findings, It was concluded that distance learning and traditional classroom students experienced a high level of satisfaction .It was determined that there was very slightly difference in the levels of student satisfaction in the distance learning and traditional classroom students.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAHMOOD, A., MAHMOOD, S. T., MALIK, A. B. (2012). A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 128–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/140272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bates, T. (1995). Technology: Open learning and distance education. New York: Rutledge. Blustain, Harvey, Philip Goldstein, and Gregory Lozier (1999). "Assessing the New Competitive Landscape," in Dancing with the Devil, Editors: Richard N. Katz and Associates, Jossey-Bass Publishers,
  2. San Francisco. Gallegly, T. James. (2005. Relationship of student satisfaction levels in distance learning and traditional classroom environments at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Dissertation Abstracts, International, [Online document 200505]. Galusha, J.M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 5(3-4).
  3. Holmberg, B. (1989). The concept, basic character, and development potentials of distance education Distance Education, 10 (1), 127-135
  4. Imel, S. (1998) Myths and realities of distance learning. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Ohio State University (Eric Document Reproduction Service No ED 414 446). Inman, E., & Kerwin, M. (1999) Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning Community College. Journal of Research & Practice, 23 (6), 581-592
  5. Keegan, D. (1995). Distance education technology for the new millennium: compressed video teaching. ZIFF Papiere Hagen, Germany: Institute for Research into Distance Education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No ED 389 931). Lionarakis, Antonis (2003).The quality of the learning experience: a comparative study between open distance and conventional education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4 (2) Malley, O. J. (1999). Students Perceptions of Distance Learning, Online Learning and the Traditional Classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume II, Number IV, Winter, State University of West Georgia, Distance Education Center McEwen, B. C. (2001). Web-assisted and online learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 98-103
  6. McNally, D.Jones, B. W.Enhancing Astronomical Research and Education in Developing Countries, 23rd meeting of the IAU, Joint Discussion 20, 26 August 1997,
  7. Kyoto, Japan, meeting abstract. Moore, D. R., & Lockee, B. B. (1998). taxonomy of bandwidth: considerations and principles to guide practice in the design and delivery of distance education. Unpublished manuscript: Portland State University. Moore, M and Tait, A. (2002. Open and Distance Learning: Trends, Policy and Strategy Considerations. Paris, UNESCO. Moskal, P. D., & Dziuban, C. D. (2001) present and futu