Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Isolation and identification of Bacillus pumilus YHH-2, a potential pathogen to the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyllenhal)

Pages
461–464
Publication Date
2020-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the results of the present study are important due to showing for the first time the presence of Bacillus pumilus Y HH-2 in the digestive tract of the alfalfa weevil and it may be used as a potential biocontrol agent against the harmful effects of this insect species.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyllenhal, 1813) samples were collected from different locations in Kirsehir, Turkey, during May-August in 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conventional and molecular methods that include morphological and physiological examinations, biochemical tests, 16S rDNA sequencing, and the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) were used for identification of the bacterial isolates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the results of the present study are important due to showing for the first time the presence of Bacillus pumilus Y HH-2 in the digestive tract of the alfalfa weevil and it may be used as a potential biocontrol agent against the harmful effects of this insect species.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Alfalfa weevil · Bacillus pumilus · biocontrol

Abstract

Alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyllenhal, 1813) samples were collected from different locations in Kirsehir, Turkey, during May-August in 2014. They were immediately transferred to the research laboratory and dissected under aseptic conditions. Then serial dilutions were prepared from digestive tract samples and the spread plate technique was used for obtaining pure cultures. The conventional and molecular methods that include morphological and physiological examinations, biochemical tests, 16S rDNA sequencing, and the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) were used for identification of the bacterial isolates. According to the findings of the present study, the YHH-2 isolate was found as the main pathogenic bacterium that dominates the digestive tract microflora of the alfalfa weevil. 16S rDNA sequencing and the BLAST data revealed that YHH-2 showed 100% similarity to Bacillus pumilus, recently described as an entomopathogenic strain. In conclusion, the results of the present study are important due to showing for the first time the presence of Bacillus pumilus Y HH-2 in the digestive tract of the alfalfa weevil and it may be used as a potential biocontrol agent against the harmful effects of this insect species.

🔖

Cite This Article

OGUTCU, H., ERBEY, Y., GÜLLÜCE, M., ALAYLAR4, B., KARADAYI, M., SEZEN, S., ERBEY, M. (2020). Isolation and identification of Bacillus pumilus YHH-2, a potential pathogen to the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica Gyllenhal). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 461–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/179393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Cawoy H, 2011, PESTICIDES IN THE MODERN WORLD - PESTICIDES USE AND MANAGEMENT, P273 Dharne M, 2006, J BIOSCIENCES, V31, P293, DOI 10.1007/BF02704100 Earl AM, 2007, J BACTERIOL, V189, P1163, DOI 10.1128/JB.01343-06 Efil L, 2018, TURKISH J AGR NAT SC, V5, P86 Gogusgeren N, 2009, DETERMINATION STRAIN Handtke S, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085625 Iwase S, 2015, BIOL INVASIONS, V17, P3639, DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-0985-1 JOHANSEN CA, 1983, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V12, P1513, DOI 10.1093/ee/12.5.1513 KINGSLEY PC, 1993, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V22, P1234, DOI 10.1093/ee/22.6.1234 Kloepper JW, 2004,
  2. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V94, P1259, DOI 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259 Lu F, 2013, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V42, P874, DOI 10.1603/EN13111 Nielsen P, 1997, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V22, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0168-6496(96)00089-X Ozmen M, 2009, EFFECTS INSECTICIDE. Pellissier ME, 2017, J INTEGR PEST MANAG, V8, DOI 10.1093/jipm/pmw018 Pitts-Singer Theresa L., 2008, P105. Pu YC, 2016, J APPL ENTOMOL, V140, P617, DOI 10.1111/jen.12293 Pu YC, 2017, PEST MANAG SCI, V73, P1494, DOI 10.1002/ps.4485 Reddy GVP, 2016, TOXICOL REP, V3, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.05.003 Rishad KS, 2017, PESTIC BIOCHEM PHYS, V137, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.09.005 Seyma S.K, 2014, ERCIYES U J I SCI TE, V30, P338 Slepecky RA, 2006, PROKARYOTES: A HANDBOOK ON THE BIOLOGY OF BACTERIA, VOL 4, THIRD EDITION, P530, DOI 10.1007/0-387-30744-3_16 Summers C. G., 1998, Integrated Pest Management Reviews, V3, P127, DOI 10.1023/A:1009654901994 Talwar N, 2015, CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MA, V3, P9 Temiz A, 2010, GENEL MIKROBIYOLOJI. Tetik Z, 2007, MICROORGANISMS ISOLA. Tuatay N, 1952, PLANT PROTECTION B, V4, P10 Wilson K., 1997, CURRENT PROTOCOLS MO, V56, P241