Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of some enthomopathogens as biocontrol agents of Tinocallis (Sappocallis) saltans (Nevsky, 1929) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Pages
124–132
Publication Date
2021-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was concluded in the present study that these bacteria strains may be used successfully as bioagents in the biological control against T. saltans.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkey, Tinocallis (Sappocallis) saltans (Nevsky) on Ulmus glabra Hudson was detected for the first time, and it was determined that it caused a considerable amount of damage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 12 bacteria strains were tested for control efficacy and verified: Brevibacillus brevis (2), Bacillus thuringiensis (1), Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kenyae(2), Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstakii (2), Bacillus subtilis (1), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (1), Bacillus sphaericus GC subgroup D (1), Pseudomonasfluorescens biotype C (1), Bacillus atrophaeus (1), and 1 fungus isolate (Beauveria bassiana).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was concluded in the present study that these bacteria strains may be used successfully as bioagents in the biological control against T. saltans.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bacillus spp. · Beauveria bassiana · biological control

Abstract

In Turkey, Tinocallis (Sappocallis) saltans (Nevsky) on Ulmus glabra Hudson was detected for the first time, and it was determined that it caused a considerable amount of damage. The study was conducted for the purpose of determining the usability of enthomopathogens in the control against it, while avoiding the negative effects of chemicals on the environment and human health. A total of 12 bacteria strains were tested for control efficacy and verified: Brevibacillus brevis (2), Bacillus thuringiensis (1), Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kenyae(2), Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstakii (2), Bacillus subtilis (1), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (1), Bacillus sphaericus GC subgroup D (1), Pseudomonasfluorescens biotype C (1), Bacillus atrophaeus (1), and 1 fungus isolate (Beauveria bassiana). The trials were carried out in 2 different forms: under controlled conditions and under field conditions. Data showed that the mortality rates were between 12.84% and100% in controlled condition and between 7.72% and 31.79% in field condition over the 72 h period. B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstakii (FDP-41), B. subtilis (EK-7), and B. thuringiensis subsp. kenyae (FDP-42) were the most effective bacterial strains against the aphids in controlled conditions. The percentage of mortality related to these applications was 100% in 48 h in controlled condition. However, the effectiveness of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstakii (FDP-41) was 31.79% in 72 h in field conditions. On the other hand, fungal isolate B. bassiana (ET 10) suppressed the harmful population significantly in controlled conditions (86.64%); however, it was less effective in field conditions (13.04%). As a result, it was concluded in the present study that these bacteria strains may be used successfully as bioagents in the biological control against T. saltans.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZLU, E., TOZLU, G., KOTAN, R., CALMASUR, O. (2021). Investigation of some enthomopathogens as biocontrol agents of Tinocallis (Sappocallis) saltans (Nevsky, 1929) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 124–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/179374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Alper M, 2013, TURKISH B ENTOMOLOGY, V3, P75 Bravo JA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P16050, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1102999108 Patti I., 1998, P397. Cooke RC, 1977, FUNGI MAN HIS ENV. Kim JJ, 2004, PATHOLOGICAL STUDIES. Oncuer C, 1991, AGR PESTS PESTICIDES. Khamraev A, 2004, ZEF WORK PAPERS SUST. Yaltirik F, 1993, DENDROLOGY ANGIOSPER. Jung HS, 2006, KOREAN J MYCOL, V34, P112. Devi PSV, 2003,
  2. MYCOPATHOLOGIA, V156, P365 KLEMENT Z, 1964,
  3. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V54, P474 Sasser M, 1990, METHODS PHYTOBACTERI, P199 Tozlu E, 2011, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V20, P918 Kumar S, 2017, INT J BIOL BIOMOLECU, V11, P360 Tozlu E, 2017, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V26, P7091 HALBERT SE, 1990, P ENTOMOL SOC WASH, V92, P672 Dadasoglu F, 2016, ROM BIOTECH LETT, V21, P11272 Dadasoglu F, 2013, EGYPT J BIOL PEST CO, V23, P35 Dadasoglu F, 2014, FRESEN ENVIRON BULL, V23, P2011 Devonshire A.L., 1989, World Crop Pests, V2C, P123 Shan LT, 2010, PEST MANAG SCI, V66, P669, DOI 10.1002/ps.1928 Wright C, 2004, PEST MANAG SCI, V60, P639, DOI 10.1002/ps.808 Milner RJ, 1997,
  4. ENTOMOPHAGA, V42, P227, DOI 10.1007/BF02769900 Edreva A., 2005, General and Applied Plant Physiology, V31, P105 RICHARDS WR, 1967, CAN ENTOMOL, V99, P536, DOI 10.4039/Ent99536-5 Tesfaye D, 2010, AFR ENTOMOL, V18, P302, DOI 10.4001/003.018.0215 Vu VH, 2007, J BIOSCI BIOENG, V104, P498, DOI 10.1263/jbb.104.498 Nunez Perez E., 1991,
  5. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, V17, P355 Leite LG, 2003, MYCOL RES, V107, P872, DOI 10.1017/S0953756203007974 Tozlu E, 2016, PLANT PROTECT SCI, V52, P188, DOI 10.17221/96/2015-PPS WALTERS FS, 1995, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V77, P211, DOI 10.1007/BF02383036 Quintela ED, 1998, J ECON ENTOMOL, V91, P110, DOI 10.1093/jee/91.1.110 Zibaee I, 2013, PLANT PROTECT SCI, V49, P169, DOI 10.17221/72/2012-PPS Reed GL, 2001, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V100, P89, DOI 10.1023/A:1019250105811 Jabeen F, 2018, EGYPT J BIOL PEST CO, V28, DOI 10.1186/s41938-018-0092-6 Porcar M, 2009, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V75, P4897, DOI 10.1128/AEM.00686-09 Ripka G., 1998, Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, V33, P395 van Lenteren JC, 2018,
  6. BIOCONTROL, V63, P39, DOI 10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4 Veliz EA, 2017, AIMS MICROBIOL, V3, P689, DOI 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.689 Shi WB, 2004, BIOL CONTROL, V30, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.01.017 LEATHERS TD, 1993, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V61, P217, DOI 10.1006/jipa.1993.1040 Steenberg T, 1999, J INVERTEBR PATHOL, V73, P309, DOI 10.1006/jipa.1998.4841 Glare T, 2012, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V30, P250, DOI 10.10