Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Physicochemical, Functional and Microbiological Properties of Hardaliye Beverages Produced from Different Grapes and Collected from Different Households

Pages
278–285
Publication Date
2018-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, coliforms and Escherichia coli were not found in the analyzed samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Twenty-three hardaliye beverage samples were collected from different regions of Kirklareli city in Turkey and five hardaliye samples were produced under laboratory conditions according to traditional methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total phenolic compounds, monomeric anthocyanins (malvidin-3-glucoside), volatile acid, ethyl alcohol, total sugar contents, total acidity (lactic acid), pH, color values (L (brightness), a (red-green), b (yellow-blue)), total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, yeast and mold and coliform counts were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, coliforms and Escherichia coli were not found in the analyzed samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:23 samples
⚙️Variables:Fermentation · Grape juice · Hardaliye

Abstract

Twenty-three hardaliye beverage samples were collected from different regions of Kirklareli city in Turkey and five hardaliye samples were produced under laboratory conditions according to traditional methods. Total phenolic compounds, monomeric anthocyanins (malvidin-3-glucoside), volatile acid, ethyl alcohol, total sugar contents, total acidity (lactic acid), pH, color values (L (brightness), a (red-green), b (yellow-blue)), total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, yeast and mold and coliform counts were determined. Acidity between 0.38 and 0.91%, pH from 3.54 and 4.33, color (L.a.b.) values from 7.57 to 13.74, from 0.71 to 7.68, from 0.73 to 4.50, respectively were determined. Total phenolics from 368.8 to 2647.5 mg L-1, ethanol between 0.4 and 6.0% in 7 out of 23 examples, TMAB number 3x1013.2x106 cfu mL-1, LAB 1x102-3x105 cfu mL-1 in 16 out of 23 samples, yeast and mold count 1x101-2,3x104 cfu mL-1 in 18 out of 23 samples were found. According to the results obtained, coliforms and Escherichia coli were not found in the analyzed samples. Statistical analysis results revealed that differences between samples were significant (P≤0.01). Given its bioactive characteristics, hardaliye beverage should be produced at large-scale and be recognized by large communities.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, F., ARICI, M., GULCU, M., ÇELİKYURT, G., MIRIK, M. (2018). Physicochemical, Functional and Microbiological Properties of Hardaliye Beverages Produced from Different Grapes and Collected from Different Households. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 278–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/178630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anonymous (2001a).
  2. Aerobic Plate Count, FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chap. 3 Anonymous (2001b).
  3. Staphylococcus aureus, FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chap. 12 Anonymous (2001c).
  4. Yeasts, Molds and Mycotoxins, FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chap. 18 Anonymous (2002). Enumeration of E. coli and the Coliform Bacteria, FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chap. 4 Arici M & Coskun F (2001). Hardaliye: fermented grape juice as a traditional Turkish beverage. Food Microbiology 18: 417-421 Aşkın B & Atik A (2016). Color and antioxidant properties of fermented grape beverage under different storage conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 40: 803-812
  5. Baumgart J (1993). Mikrobiologische Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln, Behr’s Verlag, Hamburg Cemeroğlu B (2007). Gıda Analizleri. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayınları No: 34, Ankara,
  6. Turkey Coşkun F, Arici M, Gülcü M & Çelikyurt G (2009). Some physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of Hardaliye produced using different methods In: II. Traditional Foods Symposium, 27-29
  7. May, Van, Turkey, pp. 665-669
  8. Coşkun F, Arici M, Çelikyurt G & Gülcü M (2012). Changes occuring at the end of storage in some properties of hardaliye produced by using different methods. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 9(3): 62-67
  9. Çelik S (1998). Asmanın Büyüme ve Gelişme Fizyolojisi, Bağcılık (Ampeleloji) Cilt 1. 426 s, Tekirdag, Turkey Fidan I (1975). Şarap Analiz Yöntemleri. Tekel Enstitüleri Yayınları, Seri A No: 11, Istanbul, Turkey Güven S & Aksoy M (2009). Some Modifications in Hardaliye Production. In: II. Traditional Foods Symposium, 27-29
  10. May, Van, Turkey, pp. 675-678
  11. Jacobson J L (2006). Introduction to Wine Laboratory Practices and Procedures. Springer Science and Business Media New York, pp. 375 Kanemaru K & Miyamoto T (1990). Inhibitory effects on the growth of several bacteria by brown mustard and allyl isothiocyanalte. Journal of Japanese Society Food Science and Technology 37: 823- 829 Kılıç O & Çopur Ö U (1988). The quality criteria of hardaliye produced from some grape varieties In: Turkey III. Viticulture Symposium, 31 May-3 June, Bursa, Turkey, pp. 12 Lemay M J, Choquette J, Delaquis P J, Gariépy C, Rodrigue N & Saucier L (2002). Antimicrobial effect of natural preservatives in a cooked and acidified chicken meat model. International Journal of Food Microbiology 78: 217-226
  12. Middleton E J (1998). Effect of plant flavonoids on immune and inflammatory cell function. Advance