Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

The influence of photoperiod on size and development of ovarioles in insecticide resistant and susceptible strains of the house fly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Pages
325–331
Publication Date
2011-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ovarioles were dissected from the collected adults and microscopically examined to determine overall length and developmental stage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The ovariole development of laboratory-reared insecticide resistant and sensitive strains of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) under different photoperiod regimes was examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Flies were reared under laboratory conditions of 75 ± 5% RH, 25 ± 1 °C and 0:24, 6:18, 12:12, and 18:6 h L:D photoperiods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ovarioles were dissected from the collected adults and microscopically examined to determine overall length and developmental stage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: House fly · Musca domestica · ovariole development

Abstract

The ovariole development of laboratory-reared insecticide resistant and sensitive strains of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) under different photoperiod regimes was examined. Flies were reared under laboratory conditions of 75 ± 5% RH, 25 ± 1 °C and 0:24, 6:18, 12:12, and 18:6 h L:D photoperiods. Each day, 20 female flies were collected from a cohort of females that had emerged on the same date. Ovarioles were dissected from the collected adults and microscopically examined to determine overall length and developmental stage. For the resistant strain, development was most rapid under the photoperiod regimes with more hours of darkness and steadily decreased with increasing hours of light. However, development of the susceptible strain was most rapid at both photoperiod extremes of 0:24 and 18:6 h L:D. Results also showed that the effect of both photoperiod and resistance status and the interaction between these factors had a significant effect on ovariole development.

Özet

The ovariole development of laboratory-reared insecticide resistant and sensitive strains of the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) under different photoperiod regimes was examined. Flies were reared under laboratory conditions of 75 ± 5% RH, 25 ± 1 °C and 0:24, 6:18, 12:12, and 18:6 h L:D photoperiods. Each day, 20 female flies were collected from a cohort of females that had emerged on the same date. Ovarioles were dissected from the collected adults and microscopically examined to determine overall length and developmental stage. For the resistant strain, development was most rapid under the photoperiod regimes with more hours of darkness and steadily decreased with increasing hours of light. However, development of the susceptible strain was most rapid at both photoperiod extremes of 0:24 and 18:6 h L:D. Results also showed that the effect of both photoperiod and resistance status and the interaction between these factors had a significant effect on ovariole development.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAR, S. S., SAĞLAM, İ. K., AKINER, M. M. (2011). The influence of photoperiod on size and development of ovarioles in insecticide resistant and susceptible strains of the house fly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 325–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/177654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, T.S. and Hintz, A.M. 1969. Relationship of age, ovarian development and the corpus allatum to mating in the housefl y, Musca domestica. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 201-215.
  2. Briers, T. and De Loof, A. 1981. Moulting hormone activity in the adult Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata in relation to reproduction and diapause. Int. J. Invert. Reprod. Dev. 3: 145-155.
  3. Conn, H.J., Darrow, M.A. and Emmel, V.M. 1960. Staining procedures. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland, 289p. Çağlar, S.S. 1987.
  4. Karasinek, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)’nin sentetik pyrethroid grubu insektisitlerden Tetramethrin’e dirençli populasyonlarında gün uzunluğunun populasyon dinamizmi üzerine etkileri. H.U. Fen Bil. Ens. Bilim Uzmanligi Tezi, 64p. Çağlar, S.S. 1991. Th e investigation on resistance level to tetramethrin of house fl y, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) and life table studies. Turk. J. Zool. 15: 91-97.
  5. Çağlar, S.S. 1993. Eff ects of photoperiod on population dynamics of tetramethrin resistant population of house fl y, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Hacettepe Bull. Nat. Sci. Eng. 14: 21-37.
  6. Çağlar, S.S., Akıner, M.M. and Yazgan, N. 2000. Resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides in diff erent populations of M. domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), Proceedings of the 13th European SOVE Meetings, Antalya- Turkey, 245-251.
  7. Çağlar, S.S. and Sağlam, I.K. 2005. Eff ects of photoperiod on testis development of insecticide resistant and susceptible populations of the house fl y, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Hacettepe J. Biol. and Chem. 34: 45-50.
  8. Crow, J. F. 1957. Genetics of insect resistance to chemicals. Annual Review of Entomology 2: 227-246.
  9. De Kort, C.A.D. 1990. Th irty-fi ve years of diapause research with the Colorado potato beetle. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 56: 1-284.
  10. De Kort, C.A.D., Bergot, B.J. and Schooley, D.A. 1982. Th e nature and titre of juvenile hormone in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 471-474.
  11. De Wilde, J., Duintjer, C.S. and Mook, L. 1959. Physiology of diapause in the adult Colorado beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) I. Th e photoperiod as a controlling factor. J. Insect Physiol. 3: 75-85.
  12. Hodin, J. and Riddiford, L.M. 2000. Diff erent mechanisms underlie phenotypic plasticity and interspecifi c variation for a reproductive character in Drosophilids (Insecta: Diptera). Evolution. 54: 1638-1653.
  13. Kelly, T.J., Adams, T.S., Schwartz, M.B., Birnbaum, M.J