Journals / Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 16

Translation as a Form of Social Representation and the Case Of Re-Introducing Karagöz to Turkish Readers: Karagöz Adaptations of Ismayil Hakki Baltacioğlu and Aziz Nesin*

Pages
99–128
Publication Date
2011-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By doing so, this paper attempts to trace the possible change(s) that the traditional understanding of Karagöz plays might have been through in the adaptations of Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu and Aziz Nesin with the purpose of shedding light on how these two authors critically engaged with this theatre form in question.  

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:      Abstract      One of the most striking forms of Traditional Turkish Theatre, namely Karagöz has a significant place in the history of Turkish Theatre.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this context, Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu's Karagöz Ankara'da and Aziz Nesin's Üç Karagöz Oyunu suggest themselves as notable examples of these adaptations owing to the hints that they might carry regarding the social dynamics of the 1940s and 1960s respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By doing so, this paper attempts to trace the possible change(s) that the traditional understanding of Karagöz plays might have been through in the adaptations of Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu and Aziz Nesin with the purpose of shedding light on how these two authors critically engaged with this theatre form in question.  
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

      Abstract      One of the most striking forms of Traditional Turkish Theatre, namely Karagöz has a significant place in the history of Turkish Theatre. As opposed to the contemporary understanding of Karagöz within the Turkish society that foregrounds the humorous and childish aspects of this theatre form, Karagöz was amongst the sparse ways of criticising the collapsed social system of the Ottoman Empire during the turbulent years of the nineteenth century. The ultimate reason for this current understanding of Karagöz stems from the way that it is presented to Turkish readers. Nevertheless, a brief glance at the particular periods of the history of the Turkish Republic points out a visible change of representing this theatre form to Turkish readers. In The One-party Period and during the years following that period, there was a serious attempt of modernising Karagöz by means of adaptations. Within this context, Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu's Karagöz Ankara'da and Aziz Nesin's Üç Karagöz Oyunu suggest themselves as notable examples of these adaptations owing to the hints that they might carry regarding the social dynamics of the 1940s and 1960s respectively. These adaptations, moreover, call for a re-reading from the vantage point of Translation Studies owing to the vital role that Baltacıoğlu and Nesin attribute to the socio-critical aspect peculiar to Karagöz plays in their works. Since any given translation comprises the elements of the society that it belongs to, one could deem Karagöz as a form of social representation thanks to the essential feature of it that offers place for each persona of the Ottoman Society during the course of the performance(s). In this regard, the process of re-introducing Karagöz to Turkish readers by way of adaptations suggests itself as a primary issue to be discussed from the vantage point of the contemporary understanding of translation. Taking this argument as a starting point, this paper aims at re-evaluating Karagöz adaptations of Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu and Aziz Nesin from the perspectives that sociology, Translation Studies, as well as Theatre Studies provide. In order to do so, this article discusses Karagöz as a form of social representation. By doing so, this paper attempts to trace the possible change(s) that the traditional understanding of Karagöz plays might have been through in the adaptations of Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu and Aziz Nesin with the purpose of shedding light on how these two authors critically engaged with this theatre form in question.  

🔖

Cite This Article

Dinçel, B. (2011). Translation as a Form of Social Representation and the Case Of Re-Introducing Karagöz to Turkish Readers: Karagöz Adaptations of Ismayil Hakki Baltacioğlu and Aziz Nesin*. Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi, Sayı: 16, 99–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/174469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Aaltonen, Sirkku, Time-Sharing on Stage, Clevedon: Multilungual Matters, 2000
  2. And, Metin, Karagöz: Turkish Shadow Theatre, Istanbul: Dost Publication, 1979
  3. And, Metin, Geleneksel Türk Tiyatrosu, Istanbul: İnkilâp Kitabevi, 1985
  4. And, Metin, Drama at the Crossroads, Istanbul: The Isis Press, 1991
  5. And, Metin, ―Ataç‘ın Tiyatroyla İlgisi‖, in Kitap-lık 48, pp. 111-119, 2001
  6. Ahıska, Meltem, ―Hayal Edilemeyen Toplum: Türkiye‘de ‗Çevresiz Merkez‘ ve Garbiyatçılık‖, in Toplum ve Bilim 105, pp. 11-29, 2006
  7. Ataç, Nurullah, ―Karagöz Hakkında‖, in Karagöz Kitabı Sevengül Sönmez (ed.), Istanbul: Kitabevi, pp. 225-226, 2005
  8. Baltacıoğlu, Ismayıl Hakkı, Karagöz Ankara‟da, Istanbul: Sebat Basımevi, 1940
  9. Baltacıoğlu, Ismayıl Hakkı, Karagöz Tekniği ve Estetiği, Istanbul: Kültür Matbaası, 1942
  10. Baltacıoğlu, Ismayıl Hakkı, Tiyatro Nedir Atila Alpöge, Turhan Yılmaz Öğüt and Ali Baltacıoğlu (eds.), Istanbul: Mitos Boyut, 2006
  11. Bassnett, Susan, Translation Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 2004
  12. Baş, Selma, ―Karagöz‘ün Modernleştirilmesi Çabalarına Bir Örnek: Aziz Nesin‘in Üç Karagöz Oyunu‖, in Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras: Yaşayan Karagöz, Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri Öcal Oğuz and Yeliz Özay (eds.). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Yayınları, pp. 94-119, Bastin, Georges L., ―Adaptation‖, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies Mona Baker (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 5-8, 1998
  13. Çalışlar, Aziz, 20. Yüzyılda Tiyatro, Istanbul: Mitos Boyut, 1993
  14. Dinçel, Burç İdem, ―Bütüncül Tiyatro Anlayışının Belirgin Örnekleri: Peer Gynt ve Rüya Oyunu‖, in İstanbul Üniversitesi Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 7, Istanbul: Istanbul University Press, pp. 96-109, 2005
  15. Dinçel, Burç İdem, ―The Facts of Turkish Theatre‖, in Turkish Book Review 2, Istanbul: Plan B, pp. 84-85, 2008
  16. Gürün, Dikmen, ―1950‘ler ve Tiyatro Sanatının Yönelimleri‖, in İstanbul Üniversitesi
  17. Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 3, Istanbul: Istanbul University Press, pp. 55-63, 2003
  18. Halide Edib, Turkey Faces West, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1930
  19. Kafadar, Osman, Türk Eğitim Düşüncesinde Batılılaşma, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 1997
  20. Karaboğa, Kerem, ―Medeniyet, Milliyet ve Baltacıoğlu‘nun ‗Öz Tiyatro‘su‖, in İstanbul Üniversitesi Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 10, Istanbul: Istanbul University Press, pp. 3-19, 2007
  21. Kudret, Cevdet Karagöz v. 1, Ankara: Bilgi, 1968
  22. Lefevere, André, Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame, London and New York: Routledge, 1992
  23. Nesin, Aziz, Üç Karagöz Oyunu, Istanbul: İstanbul Matbaası, 1968
  24. Ortaylı, İlber, İmparatorluğun En Uzun Yüzyılı, Istanbul: İletişim, 2001
  25. Ortaylı, İlber, Osmanlı Toplumunda Aile, Istanbul: Pan, 2007
  26. Özbaran, Salih, Osmanlı‟yı Özlemek ya da Tarih Tasarlamak, Ankara: İmge, 2007
  27. Özcan, Ufuk, ―Türkiye‘de Sosyoloji: Başlıca Akımlar, Dönemler ve Figürler‖, in Türk Sosyologları ve Eserleri-II, Genel Eğilimler ve Kurumsallaşma, Sosyoloji Yıllığı 20, Ertan Eğribel, Ufuk Özcan (eds.), Istanbul: Kitabevi, pp. 95-216, 2010
  28. Paker, Saliha, ―Turkey: The Age of Translation and Adaptation, 1850-1914‖, in Modern
  29. Literature in the Near and Middle East 1850-1970, Robin Ostle (ed.), London and New York: Routledge, 1991, pp. 17-32, 1991
  30. Pekman, Yavuz, Çağdaş Tiyatromuzda Geleneksellik, Istanbul: Mitos Boyut, 2002
  31. Pekman, Yavuz, ―Türk Tiyatrosunda Çağdaş Bir Kuramcı: Ismayıl Hakkı Baltacıoğlu‖, in İstanbul Üniversitesi Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 3, Istanbul: Istanbul University Press, pp. 64-78, 2003
  32. Pekman, Yavuz, ―Türk Tiyatrosunda Bir Başrol Olarak ―Mahalle‖, in İstanbul Üniversitesi Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 10, Istanbul: Istanbul University Press, pp. 20-49, 2007
  33. Sezer, Baykan, Türk Sosyolojisinin Ana Sorunları, İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2006
  34. Siyavuşgil, Sabri Esat, ―İstanbul‘da Karagöz ve Karagöz‘de İstanbul‖ in Karagöz Kitabı, Sevengül Sönmez (ed.), Istanbul: Kitabevi, pp. 104-118, 2005
  35. Sokullu, Sevinç, Türk Tiyatrosunda Komedyanın Evrimi, Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1979
  36. Sonyel, Salâhi R. ―Tanzimat and its Effects on the Non-Muslim Subjects of the Ottoman Empire‖, in Tanzimat‟ın 150. Yıldönümü Uluslararası Sempozyumu, Ankara: 31 Ekim-3 Kasım 1989, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, pp.353-388, 1994
  37. Şener, Sevda, Gelişim Sürecinde Türk Tiyatrosu, Istanbul: Alkım, 2003
  38. Tahir-Gürçağlar, Şehnaz, ―The Translation Bureau Revisited: Translation as Symbol‖, in Apropos of Ideology Maria Calzada-Pérez (ed.), Manchester: St. Jerome, pp. 113-129, 2003
  39. Tekerek, Nurhan, ―Tiyatromuzun Modern Tiyatroyla Kesişmesi Yolunda Gelenekselin Önemi ve Baltacıoğlu‘ndan Bir Deneme: Kafa Tamircisi‖, in Tiyatro Araştırmaları Dergisi 17, Ankara: Ankara University Press, pp. 35-49, 2004
  40. Tsoukalas, Ioannis, ―A Method for Surveying Social Representations‖, in Quality & Quantity, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 959-981, 2006
  41. Whitley, Jr., Principles of Research in Behavioral Science, California: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1996
  42. Yüksel, Ayşegül, Çağdaş Türk Tiyatrosundan On Yazar, Istanbul: Mitos Boyut, 1997
  43. Zatlin, Phyllis, Theatrical Translation and Film Adaptation, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2005 Internet Resources
  44. Wagner, Wolfgang, ―Description, Explanation and Method in Social Representation Research‖, in Papers on Social Representations. Vol. 4 no. 2, 1995. (Accessed 03.05.2010)